首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeavor is surely publicly financed science. Morally, ta
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeavor is surely publicly financed science. Morally, ta
admin
2019-09-23
75
问题
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeavor is surely publicly financed science. Morally, taxpayers who wish to should be able to read about it without further expense. And science advances through cross-fertilization between projects. Barriers to that exchange slow it down.
There is a widespread feeling that the journal publishers who have mediated this exchange for the past century or more are becoming an impediment to it. One of the latest converts is the British government. Recently it announced that, the results of taxpayer-financed research would be available, free and online, for anyone to read and redistribute.
Britain’s government is not alone. Soon the European Union followed suit. In the U.S., the National Institutes of Health (NIH, the single biggest source of civilian research funds in the world) has required open-access publishing since 2008. And the Wellcome Trust, a British foundation that is the world’s second-biggest charitable source of scientific money, after the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, also insists that those who receive its support should make their work available free.
Criticism of journal publishers usually boils down to two things. One is that their processes take months, when the Internet could enable them to take days. The other is that because each paper is like a mini-monopoly, which workers in the field have to read if they are to advance their own research, there is no incentive to keep the price down. The publishers thus have scientists — or, more accurately, their universities, which pay the subscriptions — in an armlock. That, combined with the fact that the raw material (manuscripts of papers) is free, leads to generous returns. In 2011, Elsevier, a large Dutch publisher, made a profit of £768 million on revenues of £2.06 billion — a margin of 37 percent. Indeed, Elsevier’s profits are thought so
egregious
by many people that 12,000 researchers have signed up to boycott the company’s journals.
Publishers do provide a service. They organize peer reviews, in which papers are criticized anonymously by experts (though those experts, like the authors of papers, are seldom paid for what they do). They also sort the scientific sheep from the goats, by deciding what gets published, and where. That gives the publishers huge power. Since researchers, administrators and grant-awarding bodies all take note of which work has got through this filtering mechanism, the competition to publish in the best journals is intense, and the system becomes self-reinforcing, increasing the value of those journals still further.
But not, perhaps, for much longer. Support has been swelling for open-access scientific publishing: doing it online, in a way that allows anyone to read papers free of charge. The movement started among scientists themselves, but governments are paying attention and asking whether they might also benefit from the change.
Much remains to be worked out. Some fear the loss of the traditional journals’ curation and verification of research. Even Sir Mark Walport, the director of the Wellcome Trust and a fierce advocate of open-access publication, worries that the newly liberated papers have ended up in different places rather than being consolidated in the way they want.
A revolution, then, has begun. Technology permits it; researchers and politicians want it. If scientific publishers are not trembling in their boots, they should be.
Before the publication of papers, peer reviews are to______.
选项
A、differentiate papers
B、evaluate them
C、exercise the power of publishers
D、add the value of journals
答案
B
解析
细节题。根据关键词定位原文第5段第2句,大意为“出版社组织同行评审专家对论文进行匿名评审”,故选B(评估论文)。值得注意的是,选项A(区分论文)也与题意接近,但不如B准确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/rAMO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Whichofthefollowingcanbestdescribehissituation?
Listentothefollowingpassage.WriteinEnglishashortsummaryofaround150wordsofwhatyouhaveheardontheANSWERSHEET
A、Askthepersonsittingclosetoittohelp.B、Standupandgetit.C、Sitwhereoneis,butstretchone’sarmsforit.D、Don’t
Asalways,IampleasedtobehereattheNationalPressClubformy【L1】______Speech.ThisistheseventhtimeIhavehadthe【L2
A、正确B、错误B特定信息的找寻和判断。根据原文Mr.Hooper,Ihavebeenwiththiscompanynowforsevenyears可知某人在向Mr.Hooper陈述已在公司工作了七年这一事实。由此可见题干的说法与原
DoLanguagesShapetheWayWeThink?VocabularyandExpressionsperceivedifferentiatefacilitateADanipersoncannot
Onwhichdayisthehotelavailable?
LatinAmericanandChineseofficialshaveopenedtwodaysoftalksontradeandinvestment.ThefirstChina/LatinAmericaand
Howmanymemoryhacksarementionedinthearticle?
EveningTrainandtheWomanIamworriedaboutthewoman.Iamafraidshemighthurtherself,perhapshasalreadyhurthersel
随机试题
企业分立
组织液的形成因素不包括
患者,男,12岁。患流痰3年,溃口位于左腰部,脓水稀薄,夹有败絮样物,伴有午后潮热,夜间盗汗,口燥咽干,咳嗽痰血,舌红少苔。脉细数。内治应首选()
下列不为民法上物的是:()
桥梁试验的任务主要包括以下()。
下列项目中,不属于票据的是()。
销售火爆的iPad2位于成都的制造车间发生爆炸,整条生产线被炸毁,造成大量人员伤亡。一些经销商认为由于生产线瘫痪iPad2会出现供货紧张的情况,如果此时抢购大量iPad2就可以在市场供货不足时以高价售出,获取高额利润。以下哪项如果为真最可能让这些
下列天体系统中,不包含地球的是()。
Itallstartedin2009,withaseven-hourtraintripfromOslotoBergen.Bergensbanen,alivebroadcastofthevoyagebyNRK,f
A、Hissuggestionsandhelp.B、Thecruelrealityandunpleasantlife.C、Theresponsibilitytohelpothers.D、Theprotectionofot
最新回复
(
0
)