首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Napoleon was wrong when he dismissed the British as a nation of shopkeepers (and hence unfit to defeat France in war). Compared
Napoleon was wrong when he dismissed the British as a nation of shopkeepers (and hence unfit to defeat France in war). Compared
admin
2017-03-15
56
问题
Napoleon was wrong when he dismissed the British as a nation of shopkeepers (and hence unfit to defeat France in war). Compared with France, Britain in the 1790s already had a bigger manufacturing base, a higher income per head and hence a tax base wide enough to pay for 22 years of conflict that led to the emperor’s Waterloo. Indeed, the demand for ships and munitions, created by the long war against France, boosted British industry.
Two centuries later, however, the little Corsican may have a point. This week ICI, the company that once symbolised British industry, became the target of a takeover bid from Akzo Nobel, a Dutch competitor. Meanwhile, Britain’s Tesco supermarket group is boldly expanding into America and other foreign markets in a bid to overtake France’s Carrefour (sorry, Monsieur l’Empereur) to become the world’s second-biggest retailer behind Wal-Mart. Britain has a much more open economy than America, measured by foreign trade or capital flows. Indeed, there could be no greater testimony to its health than the unsentimental ability to let one-time national champions float quietly off into another’s embrace.
Imperial Chemical Industries was born on the liner Aquitania in the mid-Atlantic when four British chemical barons of the 1920s agreed to combine forces. But the company started coming apart in the 1990s. It balked at buying Glaxo to become a world-class drugs company. Funking as predator, it became prey itself. Prodded by the threat of a hostile break-up bid from Lord Hanson, a corporate raider at the height of his powers, ICI floated off its drugs division, now AstraZeneca.
As it moved upmarket, ICI became progressively less imperial, less chemical and less industrial. It paid too much for Unilever’s specialty chemicals business and struggled to pay down the debt it incurred by selling its commodity petrochemicals operations at just the wrong point in the cycle. Its giant petrochemicals complex on Teesside—once the very symbol of British manufacturing strength—was sold to some Americans and now belongs to a Saudi company.
Such sell-offs go almost without comment now in Britain. When investors from Dubai snapped up P&O, another commercial relic of the British empire, Britons shrugged, even as nationalistic opposition in America forced the Arab buyers to find someone more trustworthy to take on the ports it owned there. German and French firms have snapped up British water and electricity companies, and London’s airports belong to a Spanish construction company. First the Dutch, then the Indians walked off with Britain’s steel industry. The Chinese bought Rover, the rump of Britain’s car industry, and shipped its machine tools back home.
It may only be a matter of time before BT (conveniently, no longer called British Telecom) becomes the first "national" telecoms incumbent in foreign hands; its mobile arm has already been taken by Spain’s Telefonica. Likewise BAE Systems (no longer British Aerospace) sees its future in America, perhaps in the belly of a beast named Boeing, Northrop Grumman or Lockheed Martin.
In most countries that would count as a litany of failure. But just as Britain led the world into industrialisation, so now Britain is leading it out. Today you can still find a few British engineers and scientists making jet engines and pharmaceuticals—and doing rather well at it. But many more are cooking up algorithms for hedge funds and investment banks—where in many cases they add more value. The economy has boomed these past 15 years, as manufacturing has been left behind and London has become the world’s leading international financial centre. Britain’s deficit in manufactured goods is hitting record highs. But so are the capital inflows.
All those foreign investors have brought a lot, too. Nissan’s car factory in Sunderland, for instance, is one of its finest anywhere. If foreigners think they can manage British factories or finances better than the natives can, they are welcome.
Imperial Chemical Industries______.
选项
A、was at its prime time in the 1990s
B、began to come apart in the 1920s
C、targeted consumers with a deep pocket
D、now belongs to Britons again
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/W5SO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
ConsumerporcelainsinJingdezhenarenotsellingwellinexportmarketascomparedwiththosemadeinLiling,HunanProvincean
Duetothefactthatuniversitiescannotenrollallthecandidates,________touniversityiscompetitive.
Thegoodthingwasthateverytimehecanceledhepromisedsomethingelse,somethingmuchexcitingthanthethingwehadtoskip
MargieappliedtoCentrelinkforNewstart,butgivingthecouplehavehadvariousmicrobusinesses,theapplicationprocesswas
下面你将听到一段有关中美贸易关系的讲话。在冷战结束后的新形势下,两国要不要及如何发展双边关系,是中美两国面临的重大课题。“永久正常贸易关系”的通过表明,在美国,支持发展中美关系的力量占了上风,美国政府、国会、工商企业界和公众的主流都支持以建设性的
TodaywelaunchUNICEF’sannualflagshipreport:"TheStateoftheWorld’sChildren2009",whichthisyearfocusesonmaternala
IampleasedtowelcomeyoutotheUnitedNationsforthisfirstmeetingofyourcontactgroup.Yourfocusonfoodsecurity
ArecentstudybytheCenterforEconomicPolicyResearchsaysthat,inordertoeaseimbalances,theEuropeanUnionneedstoma
根据最近的一项调查统计,在英国,有65%的新婚夫妇会在教堂里举行结婚仪式,大多数人死后也会有一个基督教式的葬礼,但平时只有20%,不到的人会很有规律性地固定去教堂做礼拜。难点是句子结构。整个句子有三个小句子,第二句子有个定语从句,而第三个句子中的less
纽约市是美国最大的城市,约有1100万的人口居住在纽约市及其郊区。纽约市主要分布在哈得逊河入海口的三个岛屿上。纽约市中心及许多著名景观都坐落于曼哈顿岛。一些世界最著名的摩天大楼矗立在纽约市的大街上。第五大街是著名的商业街,而百老汇则因剧院而闻名。或许纽约市
随机试题
患者,女性,40岁。右颈前区无痛性肿物1年余。鼻腔内偶有少量血液,无发热、咳嗽及消瘦,近来肿物无明显增大,无结核病史。查体:脉率72次/分,血压110/70mmHg,无突眼,右甲状腺触及约1.5cm结节,右颈外侧上区触及一肿大淋巴结,约2.5cm,稍活动,
A、发汗B、阴干C、置沸水中略烫D、蒸透心,敞开低温干燥E、置沸水中煮至透心白芍的加工方法为
下列属于栓剂水溶性基质的是
下列企业出口货物可办理退(免)增值税的有( )。
A、 B、 C、 D、 B每条直线都能分出一个“三角形”,所以,只能选择B。
毛泽东在《新民主主义论》中提出了“新民主主义”的概念。他指出:“中国革命的历史特点是分为民主主义和社会主义两个步骤,而其第一步现在已不是一般的民主主义,而是中国式的、特殊的、新式的民主主义,而是新民主主义。”新民主主义理论的系统阐明标志着
VisualBasic中的"启动对象"是指启动VisualBasic应用程序时,被自动加载并首先执行的对象。下列关于VisualBasic"启动对象"的描述中,错误的是( )。
Yearsago,agroupofbrilliantyoungmenattheUniversityofWisconsinseemedtohaveamazingcreativeliterarytalent.Theyw
UnderstandingDepressionI.Misunderstandingofdepression—Mistakenlybelievethatdepressioncomesfrom【T1】______【T1】______—
A、Shewillgethimtodohisassignment.B、Shewillhelphimputhisthingsinorder.C、Shewillcompletehishomeworkforhim.
最新回复
(
0
)