首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How to Get a Paper Published I. Prerequisite — doing (1)______researches — collecting mass information and data I. Things you s
How to Get a Paper Published I. Prerequisite — doing (1)______researches — collecting mass information and data I. Things you s
admin
2014-03-03
67
问题
How to Get a Paper Published
I. Prerequisite
— doing (1)______researches
— collecting mass information and data
I. Things you should do after the submission of your paper
A. If you do not get an acknowledgement
— post (2)______
B. When not informed of a review decision for long
— write to the editor in a(n) (3)______way
I. Advisable (4)______to the editor in different situations
A. If the paper is rejected with good reasons
— accept and learn from the experience
B. If you view the rejection as (5)______
— make a protest supported by strong evidence and good reasons
C. When confronted with the editor’s constructive advice
— consider (6)______and attempt to revise
D. When sending back the revised manuscript
— write a general (7)______:
—thank for his effort and comments
—- promise comments considered
— reproduce the editor’s review aligned with the reply:
— remind the editor
— show him your (8)______
— offer a good reason for suggestions not followed
— try to (9)______the reviewer rather than fight with him
IV. Other warnings and advice
— attach importance to established (10)______of academia
— avoid overemphasizing quantity of papers
How to Get a Paper Published
Good morning, everyone! As college students, all of you, I believe, have the capacities to do researches by your own, and also have the basic knowledge of writing research papers. But do you know how to make your paper published? Today, I’m going to give you a lecture on this.
First of all, you should write your papers well on the basis of doing mass researches and collecting mass information and data. It’s the prerequisite. Then, please focus your minds on the following tips. After you have followed all the advice on how to write a paper, had it submitted to a journal of your choice, here are things you should do.
First, if the editor and the journal are established and responsible, you should receive an acknowledgement within two weeks. Otherwise, you should post an inquiry. Manuscripts do get lost at times.
Then, once receipt is acknowledged you should wait patiently for a review decision. (3) I personally suggest that if you have not heard from the journal in four months, then you should politely write to the editor to inquire about progress on the review, since occasionally there are irresponsible editors and reviewers. Once they agreed to process your paper, they owe you some timely response. But be polite and professional in your dealings. Remember reviewing a manuscript is a volunteer activity. As authors, "demanding" actions will get you nowhere.
Finally, the reply comes back from the editor. If the editor accepts the paper without modification or with request for minor revisions only, congratulations!
More likely than not, however, the paper is not accepted as is and the editor wants major revisions and re-review; or worse, the paper is rejected. (4) In either case, you have some decisions to make-Here I offer my own experience on what to do next.
If the paper is rejected outright, then you need to decide if the decision is justified. Most of the time, this is done with good reason including value judgment. The author should accept and learn from the experience. (5) On the rare occasion when you think a real injustice has been committed and you want to protest, you had better do it with very strong evidence and well supported reasons. Furthermore , if you balance your action against the cost of protest some times you will realize it is not worth the trouble. For almost everyone, you will only have truly significant discovery a couple of times in your entire life. No one said the world is fair and most of the time, it is not worthwhile to get angry with the "small stuff".
Most reviewers are fair and have constructive things to say which you should consider carefully when attempting to revise your paper. Try not to get annoyed by the sometimes sarcastic remarks of the reviewer. Often it is their chance to payback when they were on the receiving end as authors. Thus, don’t be sarcastic and mean in responding to their reviews. Getting angry will only hurt your cause. As the saying goes "don’t get mad, get even by having your paper accepted".
When responding to a reviewer with your revised manuscript and/or specific replies, remember that months probably has gone past since the reviewer read your paper and wrote his review. Make the job easy and pleasant for him. (7) First, write a general covering letter to each reviewer thanking him for his effort and comments. Then promise that you have considered each of his comments and what you have done and responded to each. Then, reproduce his review and give your reply side by side for each remark. Remember, by this time most reviewer probably has forgotten what he said about your paper. You need to make things easy and to remind him. (8) Also showing you took his comments seriously will impress him with your effort and sincerity.
But you need not agree with everything the reviewer said. If you must disagree, do it professionally and with no discomfort. Above all. explain why you cannot do what he suggests with a good reason. Fair referees and editors will respect you.
Above all, remember your task is to win over the reviewer and not to fight with him. The playing field between a reviewer and an author is not level. You can seldom win a fight with an editor or a reviewer.
In addition to dealing with the relationship with an editor or a reviewer, another thing I need to remind you is that though currently quantity of publication is all important, conforming to established custom and traditions of academia is of great significance. The emphasis on quantity will soon pass and you will regret if you give in to some incentives for aberrant and unethical behavior. Therefore, I want to say that you should put correct eyes on the publishing of papers. Never copy anybody’s work!
Well, in summary, when you contact a reviewer, remember to be patient and professional to him, learn from the experience rather than get annoyed if the paper is rejected, and furthermore, do something to remind a reviewer when you send to him your revised manuscript. If you follow my advice, chances are that you will have your paper published. OK, today’s lecture is over. Thank you very much!
选项
答案
customs and traditions
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/ydZO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Mummiescaptureourimaginationsandourhearts.Fullofsecretsandmagic,theywereoncepeoplewholivedandloved,justasw
InthefirstepisodeofSixFeetUnder,apopularAmericantelevisionshowairedearlierthisdecade,alargecorporationtries
Despitethefactthattodayvirusesareknowntocausecancerinanimalsandincertainplants,whereexistsagreatreluctance
Inthelongest-termstudyofitskind,researcherspittedtwopopulardietsheadtohead—alow-fatAmericanHeartAssociation
ItusedtobesaidthatEnglishpeopletaketheirpleasuresadly.Nodoubtthiswouldstillbetrueiftheyhadanypleasureto
Thoseharboringdoubtsaboutmicro-bloggingshouldnowbeconvincedthatmicroblogscanplayanineffective(1)______roleinm
Unlikeanearthquake,ademographicdisasterdoesnotstrikewithoutwarning.Japan’spopulationof127mispredictedtofallto
Edinburghisthecapitalof
朋友关系的存续是以相互尊重为前提的,容不得半点强求、干涉和控制。朋友之间,情趣相投、脾气对味则合、则交;反之,则离、则绝。朋友之间要熟悉、再亲密,也不能随便过头、不恭不敬。不然,默契和平衡将被打破,友好关系将不复存在。每个人都希望拥有自己的私密空间,朋友之
在人际关系问题上我们不要太浪漫主义。人是很有趣的,往往在接触一个人时首先看到的都是他或她的优点。这一点颇像是在餐馆里用餐的经验。开始吃头盘或冷碟的时候,印象很好。吃头两个主菜时,也是赞不绝口。愈吃愈趋于冷静,吃完了这顿宴席,缺点就都找出来了。于是转喜为怒,
随机试题
Facedwiththecrisis,thegirllookedpalebutwasquite______.
—Islippedonthestairs.Ithinkmyarmisbroken.—Oh!I______.
A.乳酸B.氨基酸C.肝糖原D.肌糖原不能直接分解补充血糖的糖原是
采集和处理关节腔积液,正确的是
延伸卡环除了有固位作用外,还具有
瑞文测验的分类包括()。(2003年12月三级真题)
据新华社北京2017年9月19日电,中国农业银行宣布全面推广ATM“刷脸取款”,其界面如图6所示。客户只需要点击“刷脸取款”,ATM便会进行人脸识别,客户按照ATM语音提示操作,大约20秒的时间,就能成功实现取款。该功能主要运用了()。
一、注意事项1.申论考试是对考生阅读能力、综合分析能力、提出和解决问题能力以及文字表达能力的测试。2.作答参考时限:阅读资料30分钟.作答90分钟。3.仔细阅读给定资料.按照后面提出的“申论要求”作答。二、给定资料
以下关于活动资源估算的描述中,错误的是(56)。
Oneofthe【C1】______beautifulsightsinthebirdworldisthemalepeafowl,orpeacock,strutting(炫耀)proudly【C2】______with
最新回复
(
0
)