首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
China’s law makers are considering banning children under the age of 10 from appearing in advertisements. Do you think this ban
China’s law makers are considering banning children under the age of 10 from appearing in advertisements. Do you think this ban
admin
2021-02-24
70
问题
China’s law makers are considering banning children under the age of 10 from appearing in advertisements. Do you think this ban will do more good than harm? The following are opinions from different sides. Read the excerpts carefully and write your response in about 300 words, in which you should:
1. summarize briefly the opinions from different sides;
2. give your comment.
Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
Children care experts
Joe (China) : While adults who appear in advertisements might know the details, including materials, the manufacturing process and the service life of the products that they promote, children who are under 10 might not completely grasp such information. In most cases, they don’t even actually know what the products are for. They say and do what the promoters pay them to say and do. Therefore, it’s quite doubtful whether the products these child stars speak for are reliable or not.
Lee (the US): The ban aims to protect minors from being negatively impacted by commercial activities and I think it is good. When a child rises to fame by acting in movies or in televised entertainment programs, he or she will be able to capitalize on his or her reputation. Too much entertainment engagement may be more than a child can bear, psychologically and physically. Even if they are talented in acting, their talent should not be overused. Otherwise, they may end up paying for this lost time when they grow up.
Media workers
AlexfromAmerica (the US) : I’m more libertarian about the idea. Don’t restrict advertising. We don’t need more laws on this subject. If an advertisement "crosses the line" in the way it uses children, the market will shame that company to stop using the advertisement. The law is unnecessary here.
David (Japan) : The minors and their parents should be given the right to decide whether to do the job after fully analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of being an advertising endorser. Otherwise, instead of protecting the minors’ interests, the law will restrict their freedom and rights.
Bill (the UK) : Endorsing a product does not necessarily violate the minors’ rights and interests. It’s thus wrong to forbid all such commercial activities for children. An endorsement means that the endorser recommends a product to the public in his or her own name. In this sense, children can still appear in advertisements without recommending a product in their own names. Even if the product is not as good as is advertised, they don’t need to take responsibilities for it.
Davidjames28 (China) : One unintended result of this would be the sufferings of most children’s magazines, websites and TV channels. And children are always the best choice in whether cultural or commercial promotion. And apart from children’s media, think about the children’s organizations, activities and distributed reading materials which are dependent on commercial involvement and sponsorship. I couldn’t imagine the scene in which a parent-like adult tells children what to read or what to choose. It’s much too patriarchal. I don’t mean there shouldn’t be rules on children advertisements. What I don’t like most is that we always impose uniformity in all cases.
Austrorus ( China) : Children advertisements shouldn’t be banned. Some of them are also educational and very informative. I understand that some ads are misleading but to be honest, everything has a risk. It is not the children who endorse the products on commercials to be blamed for the bad influence of the advertisements aiming at children.
Write your response on ANSWER SHEET FOUR.
选项
答案
Banning Children Under the Age of 10 from Appearing in Advertisements Policymakers in China are going to issue a law banning children under 10 from endorsing products in advertisements for fear that the children are negatively affected. People’s opinions diverge greatly on this proposal. Children care experts strongly support the ban. The first reason is that children do not have the ability to ensure the quality and reliability of the products they promote. The second one is that too much exposure to entertainment engagement and commercial activities might exert negative influence, psychologically and physically, on both the child stars and the younger viewers. In contrast, media workers claim that they don’t need a law on this subject, as it will restrict the freedom and rights of the minors and their parents. Besides, it is unfair to attribute the quality problem of a product and the bad influence of advertisements to children. What’s more, this kind of uniformity rule will surely devastate the cultural and commercial promotion of magazines, websites, TV channels, or organizations for children. Comparing the positive influences with the negative ones, I advocate that children and their parents have the right to decide what to do. Firstly, the ban on children advertisements does not prevent child stars from engaging in entertainment. The authorities can prohibit children from appearing in advertisements, but they cannot eliminate all children performances in movies and televisions. Secondly, too many other factors, not children advertisements, lead to the problem of this generation of children being too much obsessed with money and material possessions. The negligence of school and family, the influence of peers and the environment of the society should all account for the problem. Finally, this ban is nothing but the revelation of the simple and crude management of some officials. The advertisers will use cartoon characters as a new ad campaign tactic when real children are banned. Therefore, the ban is not an overall solution to the problem at all. In conclusion, I think parents, as the custodians of children, should shoulder the responsibility of children’s healthy development. What the government should do is to ensure that the ads are prepared responsibly and the products are safe for children.
解析
本题讨论是否应该禁止十岁以下儿童在广告中出现的问题,命题是社会各界关注的焦点。本题要求简要概括所给材料中的两种观点,并发表自己的看法。在具体的写作过程中,考生可以开篇点明社会现象,并提出论题;第二段简要阐述儿童养育专家和媒体工作者双方的观点;第三段重点阐述自己对这一问题的看法,并说明理由;最后一段总结全文,重申观点。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/cIIK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A、Theyrecruitstudentsfromtechnicalcolleges.B、Moststudentsgraduatedtherewouldbecartoonists.C、Theentrancecompetitio
A、TheyhavenoideawhyAndrewWrightgetssalaries.B、Theyusuallyfeelgoodaboutthemselvesafterclass.C、Theycanspendhou
DevelopinganAdvertisingCampaignGenerallyspeaking,fourmajorstepsareinvolvedinthedevelopmentofanadvertisingca
Althoughthefirstyearisreallyimportantforlanguagedevelopmentinchildren,majorlearningcontinuesthroughoutachild’s
Afterthehorrorbecamepublicinhishometown,Sylacauga,Alabama,citycouncilpresidentGeorgeCarltontoldareporter,"Thi
BillGatesmaybeoneofthesmartestguysinthecountry,butevenhe’sannoyedathavingtorememberasortofpersonalpass
不同的人对退休持不同的态度。有些人认为退休后可享受晚年的生活。但真的退了下来,他们则有点失望。看到自己就要被抛到废物堆里,他们不甘认命,设法另找事干来发挥自己的余热,以继续得到收入。另一些人则对一生中这样一个重大变动早有准备。他们一生为工作操劳,现在筋疲力
人是会病的,孩子也不能幸免,生病是生活的一部分,父母不能包办一切。我一直秉承这一思路,来处理自己和孩子的关系。父母爱孩子,是天性和本能。如何教育孩子,需要学习和实践,本能管不了那么多。孩子一天天长大,能做的事情、能思考的问题逐日增加,越来越多。一切都在潜
这个地区比较多雨。
翠翠一天比一天大了,无意中提到什么时会红脸了。时间在成长她,似乎正催促她,使她在另外一件事情上负点儿责。她欢喜看扑粉满脸的新嫁娘,欢喜说到关于新嫁娘的故事,欢喜把野花戴到头上去,还欢喜听人唱歌。茶峒人的歌声,缠绵处她已领略得出。她有时仿佛孤独了一点,爱坐在
随机试题
下列选项中不属于信用证欺诈的是【】
要约可以撤销.撤销要约的通知应当在受要约人发出承诺通知之前到达受要约人。()
下列级数发散的是()
阴阳学说的基本内容
中压A地下燃气管道与直埋电力电缆的水平净距不得小于()。
管线中心定位测量时,管线的()称为管道的主点。
我国社会主义市场经济宏观调控的主要手段有()。
以下描述中,不是线性表顺序存储结构特征的是()。
假定已在窗体上画了多个控件,其中有一个被选中,为了在属性窗口中设置窗体的属性,预先应执行的操作是
Thegreatship,Titanic,sailedforNewYorkfromSouthamptononApril10th,1912.Shewascarrying1,316【C1】______andcrewof8
最新回复
(
0
)