首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
China’s law makers are considering banning children under the age of 10 from appearing in advertisements. Do you think this ban
China’s law makers are considering banning children under the age of 10 from appearing in advertisements. Do you think this ban
admin
2021-02-24
52
问题
China’s law makers are considering banning children under the age of 10 from appearing in advertisements. Do you think this ban will do more good than harm? The following are opinions from different sides. Read the excerpts carefully and write your response in about 300 words, in which you should:
1. summarize briefly the opinions from different sides;
2. give your comment.
Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
Children care experts
Joe (China) : While adults who appear in advertisements might know the details, including materials, the manufacturing process and the service life of the products that they promote, children who are under 10 might not completely grasp such information. In most cases, they don’t even actually know what the products are for. They say and do what the promoters pay them to say and do. Therefore, it’s quite doubtful whether the products these child stars speak for are reliable or not.
Lee (the US): The ban aims to protect minors from being negatively impacted by commercial activities and I think it is good. When a child rises to fame by acting in movies or in televised entertainment programs, he or she will be able to capitalize on his or her reputation. Too much entertainment engagement may be more than a child can bear, psychologically and physically. Even if they are talented in acting, their talent should not be overused. Otherwise, they may end up paying for this lost time when they grow up.
Media workers
AlexfromAmerica (the US) : I’m more libertarian about the idea. Don’t restrict advertising. We don’t need more laws on this subject. If an advertisement "crosses the line" in the way it uses children, the market will shame that company to stop using the advertisement. The law is unnecessary here.
David (Japan) : The minors and their parents should be given the right to decide whether to do the job after fully analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of being an advertising endorser. Otherwise, instead of protecting the minors’ interests, the law will restrict their freedom and rights.
Bill (the UK) : Endorsing a product does not necessarily violate the minors’ rights and interests. It’s thus wrong to forbid all such commercial activities for children. An endorsement means that the endorser recommends a product to the public in his or her own name. In this sense, children can still appear in advertisements without recommending a product in their own names. Even if the product is not as good as is advertised, they don’t need to take responsibilities for it.
Davidjames28 (China) : One unintended result of this would be the sufferings of most children’s magazines, websites and TV channels. And children are always the best choice in whether cultural or commercial promotion. And apart from children’s media, think about the children’s organizations, activities and distributed reading materials which are dependent on commercial involvement and sponsorship. I couldn’t imagine the scene in which a parent-like adult tells children what to read or what to choose. It’s much too patriarchal. I don’t mean there shouldn’t be rules on children advertisements. What I don’t like most is that we always impose uniformity in all cases.
Austrorus ( China) : Children advertisements shouldn’t be banned. Some of them are also educational and very informative. I understand that some ads are misleading but to be honest, everything has a risk. It is not the children who endorse the products on commercials to be blamed for the bad influence of the advertisements aiming at children.
Write your response on ANSWER SHEET FOUR.
选项
答案
Banning Children Under the Age of 10 from Appearing in Advertisements Policymakers in China are going to issue a law banning children under 10 from endorsing products in advertisements for fear that the children are negatively affected. People’s opinions diverge greatly on this proposal. Children care experts strongly support the ban. The first reason is that children do not have the ability to ensure the quality and reliability of the products they promote. The second one is that too much exposure to entertainment engagement and commercial activities might exert negative influence, psychologically and physically, on both the child stars and the younger viewers. In contrast, media workers claim that they don’t need a law on this subject, as it will restrict the freedom and rights of the minors and their parents. Besides, it is unfair to attribute the quality problem of a product and the bad influence of advertisements to children. What’s more, this kind of uniformity rule will surely devastate the cultural and commercial promotion of magazines, websites, TV channels, or organizations for children. Comparing the positive influences with the negative ones, I advocate that children and their parents have the right to decide what to do. Firstly, the ban on children advertisements does not prevent child stars from engaging in entertainment. The authorities can prohibit children from appearing in advertisements, but they cannot eliminate all children performances in movies and televisions. Secondly, too many other factors, not children advertisements, lead to the problem of this generation of children being too much obsessed with money and material possessions. The negligence of school and family, the influence of peers and the environment of the society should all account for the problem. Finally, this ban is nothing but the revelation of the simple and crude management of some officials. The advertisers will use cartoon characters as a new ad campaign tactic when real children are banned. Therefore, the ban is not an overall solution to the problem at all. In conclusion, I think parents, as the custodians of children, should shoulder the responsibility of children’s healthy development. What the government should do is to ensure that the ads are prepared responsibly and the products are safe for children.
解析
本题讨论是否应该禁止十岁以下儿童在广告中出现的问题,命题是社会各界关注的焦点。本题要求简要概括所给材料中的两种观点,并发表自己的看法。在具体的写作过程中,考生可以开篇点明社会现象,并提出论题;第二段简要阐述儿童养育专家和媒体工作者双方的观点;第三段重点阐述自己对这一问题的看法,并说明理由;最后一段总结全文,重申观点。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/cIIK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
EffectiveNote-takingThedifficultyoftakingnotes:Note-takingrequiresahighlevelofabilityduetothe【T1】______ofspoke
A、TheythinkGaga’sperformingstyleisunacceptable.B、TheythinkGagaisnothard-workingenough.C、TheysupportGagainwhate
TheSkillsRequiredtoGetaJobI.Academicskills:【T1】______【T1】______1.Communicationskills—Understandandspeakthelang
DevelopinganAdvertisingCampaignGenerallyspeaking,fourmajorstepsareinvolvedinthedevelopmentofanadvertisingca
姚明今天已是一名优秀的球星,可当初他的追求目标却不是拿冠军、去NBA、当球星。他那玩命的训练,奋勇的拼搏,只是为了有一双合脚的鞋子,让全家人不再为他穿鞋而发愁。也许姚明如此简单的目标让人感到不可思议,但正是这看似简单的目标成就了他今天的辉煌。他认真实际地确
小时候我害怕狗。记得有一回在新年里,我到二伯父家去玩。在他那个花园内,一条大黑狗追赶我,跑过几块花圃。后来我上了洋楼,才躲过这一场灾难,没有让狗嘴咬坏我的腿。以后见着狗,我总是逃,它也总是追,而且屡屡望着我的影子狺狺狂吠。我愈怕,狗愈凶。怕狗成了我的一种病
“有一个人,终生在寻求生活的意义,直到最后,他才明白,人生的真谛实质是十分简单,就只是自食其力。”星星在很高很远的天上一闪一闪,端丽忽然想哭,她好久没哭了,生活里尽是好事,高兴的事,用不着眼泪。“用自己的力量,将生命的小船渡到彼岸……。
中秋时节的成都已有少许寒意。深夜拥被独坐,脑海和心怀一派空虚。突然间,一个念头不期而至——你何时才能结束心灵的流浪?就在这个深夜,在经历了轰轰烈烈之后,在极度的倦怠和百无聊赖中,在不经意不设防时,这一念头引发了一系列强烈的情绪。久违的无以言喻的失落感,无
会议室门口通常贴着一条通告:请与会者关闭手机。
随机试题
肉芽肿性炎中上皮样细胞来源于
A、规章制度B、控制设施环境C、每日查对医嘱D、基础护理合格率E、组织文化以上哪一项属于同期控制()
细胞静息电位的论述,不恰当的是
李某在甲地被判处有期徒刑7年。服刑期间,李某脱逃。李某被捕回后,发现李某脱逃期间在乙地犯有抢劫罪。对李某所犯新罪应当由哪个机关负责侦查?()
设函数f(x)在[0,+∞)上连续,且f(x)=lnx+满足,则f(x)是()。
从公共组织层次上来考察,行政效率可以分为()。
工程承包人收到劳务分包人递交的结算资料后( )内进行核实,给予确认或者提出修改意见。工程承包人确认结算资料后( )内向劳务分包人支付劳务报酬尾款。
适用于气温较高地区的消火栓是()。
本题涉及营业税法、企业所得税法。某外资持股25%的重型机械生产企业,2014年全年主营业务收入7500万元,其他业务收入2300万元,营业外收入1200万元,主营业务成本6000万元,其他业务成本1300万元,营业外支出800万元,营业税金及附加420万
()对于生活相当于能量对于()。
最新回复
(
0
)