首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2017-11-28
59
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate — or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields — those having very long wave lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as " a possible , but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic — or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the government, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilo volts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The viewpoint of the EPA is______.
选项
A、there is casual link between electricity and cancer
B、electricity really affects cancer
C、electromagnetic fields with long wave lengths are safe
D、low-frequency electromagnetic fields are a possible cause of cancer
答案
A
解析
事实细节题。第二段第三句指出,环境保护局(EPA)目前的结论是,科学证据表明,极低频电磁场(即那些具有长波的电磁场)和白血病、淋巴瘤及脑癌之间有着难以确定的联系,故答案为[A]项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/Zaua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
Theincreasedavailabilityofcopyrightedmaterialduetothedevelopmentofinformationtechnologyhasfurtheredthedebateas
Fromcavepaintingsandfrom______onboneandreindeerhorn,itisknownthatprehistorichumanswerecloseobserversofnatur
Thecomingoftherunwaysinthe1830’s______oursocietyandeconomiclife.
ThenewtechnologicalrevolutioninAmericannewspapershasbroughtincrease______,awiderrangeofpublicationsandanexpans
Inthe1960s,medicalresearchersThomasHolmesandRichardRahedevelopedachecklistofstressfulevents.Theyappreciatedthe
The______ofsmokingamongwomen,formerlynegligible,hasgrowntosuchadegreethatlungcancerhasbecomethechiefcauser
Theboarddeemediturgentthatthesefiles______rightaway.
Whatthegovernmentshoulddourgentlyistotakeactionsto______theeconomy.
随机试题
历史和现实都表明,傲慢和偏见是文明交流互鉴的最大________,平等和尊重才是文明交流互鉴的前提。构建人类命运共同体,迫切________不同国家、不同文化和历史背景的人们深入交流,增进彼此理解。填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是()。
在日常护理工作中,护士应怎样保持正确的站立姿势?
对单个风险因素风险程度估计的方法,除专家评估法和风险因素取值评定法等简单易行的方法外,还可以采用()。
《安全色》(GB2893~2008)~降禁止、指令、警告、提示用不同的颜色表示。其中代表警告的颜色是()。
钻爆法的优点是()。
利用分层法对数据进行分层,主要目的有()。
下列关于生物常识,说法不正确的是()。
关于农业生产中使用的草木灰,下列说法错误的是()。
某系统由下图所示的部件构成,每个部件的千小时可靠度都为R,该系统的千小时可靠度为________________。
在考生文件夹下,打开文档Word1.docx,按照要求完成下列操作并以该文件名Word1.docx保存文档。(1)将文中所有错词“漠视”替换为“模式”;将标题段(“8086/8088CPU的最大模式和最小模式”)的中文设置为黑体、英文设置为Ari
最新回复
(
0
)