2. 外语
  3. October 3rd, 2009 Dear Sir, In your editorial on August 31st, there seems to be some confused thinking in attempting to establi

October 3rd, 2009 Dear Sir, In your editorial on August 31st, there seems to be some confused thinking in attempting to establi

admin2011-02-09  83
问题                                                                        October 3rd, 2009
Dear Sir,
In your editorial on August 31st, there seems to be some confused thinking in attempting to establish a direct relationship between the desire of the OAA airlines to negotiate more equitable agreements with the United States for air-traffic rights and the cost of air travel for the public.
It is simply untrue that the Asian carriers are not looking for increased access to the U.S. market, including its domestic market; they are, as part of balanced agreements that provide equality of opportunity. So long as the U.S. takes the inequitable arrangements enshrined in current agreements as a starting point for negotiation, however, there is no chance that U. S. carriers will be granted more regional rights which further unbalance the economic opportunities available to each side. Most importantly from the consumer’s viewpoint, it has yet to be demonstrated that in those regional sectors where U. S. carriers currently operate—such as Hong Kong and Tokyo—they have added anything in terms of price, quality of service, innovation or seat availability in peak seasons.
Turning to cost, I am not sure to which Merrill Larrych study you are referring, but it would be simplistic to compare seat-mile costs of narrow-body operation over U. S. domestic sectors with wide-body operation over international sectors; comparative studies of seat-mile costs are valid only if they compare similar aircraft operating over identical sectors. On this basis, International Civil Aviation Organization figures show that Asian carriers are highly competitive. Of course, given its operating environment Japan Air Lines will have high seat-mile costs, while a carrier based in Southeast Asia, such as Singapore Airlines, will have relatively low costs. But it is a fallacy to assume this means "higher ticket prices or higher taxes" for the "hapless Asian air traveller" if he travels on JAL.
The Japanese carriers have to compete in the Asian market place with others, and costs cannot simply be passed on to the consumer or taxpayer. The people who really pay the price or reap the reward of differing cost levels are the share holders.
                                                                RICHARD. T. STIRLAND
                                                                        Director General
                                                                Orient Airlines Association
Which statement is NOT true according to the letter?
选项 A、Comparative studies of seat-mile costs are invalid unless they compare similar aircraft over identical sectors.
B、Asian carriers are not looking for more access to its domestic market.
C、U.S. carriers have added anything in terms of price, innovation or seat availability in peak seasons.
D、U.S. carriers with less regional rights will further make the economic opportunities unavailable.
答案B
解析 对于考查作者态度(即支持什么反对什么)的题目，我们在阅读原文时应首先明确作者观点，然后做适当批注。比如用“+”或“√”表示赞同的内容，用“-”或“×”表示反对的内容等，以便作题时回顾。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/ytid777K
本试题收录于： 托业阅读题库托业（TOEIC）分类
0

托业阅读

托业（TOEIC）

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)