首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Adults and children are frequendy confronted with statements about the alarming rate of loss of tropical rainforests. For exampl
Adults and children are frequendy confronted with statements about the alarming rate of loss of tropical rainforests. For exampl
admin
2014-08-25
50
问题
Adults and children are frequendy confronted with statements about the alarming rate of loss of tropical rainforests. For example, one graphic illustration to which children might readily relate is the estimate that rainforests are being destroyed at a rate equivalent to one thousand football fields every forty minutes - about the duration of a normal classroom period. In the face of the frequent and often vivid media coverage, it is likely that children will have formed ideas about rainforests - what and where they are, why they are important, what endangers them - independent of any formal tuition. It is also possible that some of these ideas will be mistaken.
Many studies have shown that children harbour misconceptions about ’pure’, curriculum science. These misconceptions do not remain isolated but become incorporated into a multifaceted, but organised, conceptual framework, making it and the component ideas, some of which are erroneous, more robust but also accessible to modification. These ideas may be developed by children absorbing ideas through the popular media. Sometimes this information may be erroneous. It seems schools may not be providing an opportunity for children to re-express their ideas and so have them tested and refined by teachers and their peers.
Despite the extensive coverage in the popular media of the destruction of rainforests, little formal information is available about children’s ideas in this area. The aim of the present study is to start to provide such information, to help teachers design their educational strategies to build upon correct ideas and to displace misconceptions and to plan programmes in environmental studies in their schools.
The study surveys children’s scientific knowledge and attitudes to rainforests. Secondary school children were asked to complete a questionnaire containing five open-form questions. The most frequent responses to the first question were descriptions which are self-evident from the term ’rainforest’. Some children described them as damp, wet or hot. The second question concerned the geographical location of rainforests. The commonest responses were continents or countries: Africa(given by 43% of children), South America(30%), Brazil(25%). Some children also gave more general locations, such as being near the Equator.
Responses to question three concerned the importance of rainforests. The dominant idea, raised by 64% of the pupils, was that rainforests provide animals with habitats. Fewer students responded that rainforests provide plant habitats, and even fewer mentioned the indigenous populations of rainforests. More girls(70%)than boys(60%)raised the idea of rainforest as animal habitats.
Similarly, but at a lower level, more girls(13%)than boys(5%)said that rainforests provided human habitats. These observations are generally consistent with our previous studies of pupils’ views about the use and conservation of rainforests, in which girls were shown to be more sympathetic to animals and expressed views which seem to place an intrinsic value on non-human animal life.
The fourth question concerned the causes of the destruction of rainforests. Perhaps encouragingly, more than half of the pupils(59%)identified that it is human activities which are destroying rainforests, some personalising the responsibility by the use of terms such as ’we are’. About 18% of the pupils referred specifically to logging activity.
One misconception, expressed by some 10% of the pupils, was that acid rain is responsible for rainforest destruction; a similar proportion said that pollution is destroying rainforests. Here, children are confusing rainforest destruction with damage to the forests of Western Europe by these factors. While two firths of the students provided the information that the rainforests provide oxygen, in some cases this response also embraced the misconception that rainforest destruction would reduce atmospheric oxygen, making the atmosphere incompatible with human life on Earth.
In answer to the final question about the importance of rainforest conservation, the majority of children simply said that we need rainforests to survive. Only a few of the pupils(6%)mentioned that rainforest destruction may contribute to global warming. This is surprising considering the high level of media coverage on this issue. Some children expressed the idea that the conservation of rainforests is not important.
The results of this study suggest that certain ideas predominate in the thinking of children about rainforests. Pupils’ responses indicate some misconceptions in basic scientific knowledge of rainforests’ ecosystems such as their ideas about rainforests as habitats for animals, plants and humans and the relationship between climatic change and destruction of rainforests.
Pupils did not volunteer ideas that suggested that they appreciated the complexity of causes of rainforest destruction. In other words, they gave no indication of an appreciation of either the range of ways in which rainforests are important or the complex social, economic and political factors which drive the activities which are destroying the rainforests. One encouragement is that the results of similar studies about other environmental issues suggest that older children seem to acquire the ability to appreciate, value and evaluate conflicting views. Environmental education offers an arena in which these skills can be developed, which is essential for these children as future decision-makers.
Questions 1-8
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1?
In boxes 1-8 on your answer sheet write
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this
The study reported here follows on from a series of studies that have looked at children’s understanding of rainforests.
选项
A、真
B、假
C、NOT GIVEN
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/yWNO777K
本试题收录于:
雅思阅读题库雅思(IELTS)分类
0
雅思阅读
雅思(IELTS)
相关试题推荐
Fourdifferentpersonswillbeselectedfrom2menand5womentoserveonacommittee.Ifatleast1manand1womanmustbeam
Questionsarebasedonthefollowingdata.In1998,ifone-halfoftheoccupationalinjuriesinthecombine34-and-underagegr
Inaclassof120students,60percentcanspeakFrenchandtherestcanspeakonlyEnglish.If25percentofthoseintheclass
Withasmirk,the______historiantakesitasaprofessionalobligationtoparadehumannaturealwaysasanobjectof______.
A、ProvidespecificexamplesoftheproblemsinhistoriographyB、Describesomeofthecriteriaemployedindeterminingwhatmakes
Leavingnostoneunturnedinyour______forthefugitive,gentlemen,Iwishyoueveryadvantage,fortheindividualweseekis
BeforeGibson,populardiscoursesurroundingtheInformationAgeoftendepictedthecurrenteraasoneinwhichadvanced
Leavingasidethequestionofhowblackholesgeneratetheenergyingamma-raybursts-cosmicexplosionscalledGRBs-their
Directions:Eachofthefollowingreadingcomprehensionquestionsisbasedonthecontentofthefollowingpassage.Readthepas
Inarecentstudy,DavidCressyexaminestwocentralquestionsconcerningEnglishimmigrationtoNewEnglandinthe1630s:what
随机试题
组合墙(即带有门或窗的隔墙)中,墙的隔声量应选择哪种方法合理?[2004年第6题]
A、非溶血性发热反应B、变态反应C、过敏反应D、溶血反应E、细菌污染反应输血时同时输入低渗液体时发生
原发性血小板减少性紫癜,血小板重度减少时。最严重的后果是
A、营养支持时间在2周以内B、营养支持时间在2周以上C、将多种自然食物混合成半液体状膳食D、人工配置的各种分子水平的营养成分E、用静脉途径输入生理需要的全部营养要素要素饮食即
A.口服给药B.皮肤黏膜给药C.静脉注射D.静脉滴注E.皮下或肌内注射给药新生儿胃黏膜发育不全、胃酸分泌不足、蠕动不规则可影响的给药途径为()。
A.药品监督管理部门B.32商行政管理机关C.药品价格D.药品广告E.药品经营
()又称簿记方式,或累计订单定价方式,指主承销商通过对拟IPO企业的全面、深入研究,先确定新股发行价格区间,通过召开路演推介会,征集需求量与需求价格信息建立簿记,绘出需求曲线,然后对发行价格进行修正,最后确定发行价格,承销商自由分配股份并对后市给予
公文写作之前要()。
Theprocessbymeansofwhichhumanbeingsarbitrarilymakecertainthingsstandforotherthingsmanybecalledthesymbolicpr
WhyareAmericanbillsorpapermoneyunlikethatinmanyothercountries?
最新回复
(
0
)