首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
System of Criminal Trial How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it— convi
System of Criminal Trial How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it— convi
admin
2010-01-13
71
问题
System of Criminal Trial
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it— convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trail system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so en- grossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal"—especially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally, this historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S.A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare them themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even slowed to meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
We can infer that American lawyers______.
选项
A、do not attempt to familiarize themselves with cases
B、prepare the cases themselves
C、tend to be more passionately involved in their cases
D、tend to approach cases dispassionately
答案
C
解析
从文章的倒数第二段的最后两句话,我们可以推断出与英国的律师不同,美国律师更了解案情;换言之,他们对案件更热衷一些,所以此题答案应当为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/yJGd777K
本试题收录于:
职称英语综合类基础题库职称英语分类
0
职称英语综合类基础
职称英语
相关试题推荐
CarefulobservationsandsystematicstudiesofsunspotsIfanintensesunspotactivityhadoccurredin1857,thenextonewould
Robots1.Themostsophisticated(先进的)Japaneserobots,whichhavevisionsystemsandworkatveryhighspeeds,arestillbased
Pesticides(杀虫剂)Whydopesticides(杀虫剂)fitintothepictureofenvironmentaldisease?Wehaveseenthattheynowpollutesoi
Nowadaysmanyscientistsdependonradiocarbonfordatingage-oldobjects.Radarisusedtodeterminethecharacteristicsofra
Duringthepasttenyearstherehavebeendramaticchangesintheinternationalsituation.
SymbolicProcessTheprocessbymeansofwhichhumanbeingsarbitrarilymikecertainthingsstandforotherthingsmanybec
SymbolicProcessTheprocessbymeansofwhichhumanbeingsarbitrarilymikecertainthingsstandforotherthingsmanybec
SymbolicProcessTheprocessbymeansofwhichhumanbeingsarbitrarilymikecertainthingsstandforotherthingsmanybec
SymbolicProcessTheprocessbymeansofwhichhumanbeingsarbitrarilymikecertainthingsstandforotherthingsmanybec
WideWorldofRobotsEngineerswhobuildandprogramrobotshavefascinatingjobs.Theseresearcherstinker(修补)withmachines
随机试题
β-丙氨酸是下列哪些物质的分解产物
城市规划行政主管部门审批核发()。
在Word中,段落格式应用于( )。
不久前,还有许多人从事铅字排印、晨报发送和机械打字工作,也有一些人是这些职业领域中的技术高手。今天,这些职业已经从社会上消失了。由于基因技术的发展,可能会帮助人类解决“近视”的问题,若干年后,今天非常兴旺的眼镜行业也可能会趋于消失。 据此我们知道( )
10π
[*]
VisualFoxPro支持的索引文件不包括:
下列程序的功能是:当发生窗体的单击事件时,求出3~1000之间的所有素数的和以及所有能被3和5整除的数的和(素数是指只能被1和它本身整除的数),并在窗体上把这两个和显示出来。PrivateSubForm_Click()Dims1
有以下程序:voidfun(char*a,char*b){a=b;(*a)++;)main(){charc1=’A’,c2=’a’,*p1,*p2;p1=&c1;p2=&c2;fun(p1,
An"applepolisher"isonewhogivesgiftstowinfriendshiporspecialtreatment.Itisnotexactlyabribe(贿赂),butiscloset
最新回复
(
0
)