首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
From the perspective of the poor, it seems obvious that the benefits would outweigh the costs. The benefits to poor people of no
From the perspective of the poor, it seems obvious that the benefits would outweigh the costs. The benefits to poor people of no
admin
2013-02-16
79
问题
From the perspective of the poor, it seems obvious that the benefits would outweigh the costs. The benefits to poor people of no longer being poor would be enormous. Their intake of protein and other nutrition would increase their choice of housing and the quality of the housing they select would improve. Crimes related to poverty(that the poor generally commit against each other)— murder, rape, robbery, burglary, child abuse, spouse abuse, and drug related crimes—would probably decrease. Apart from these specific improvements, the poor would benefit by an increase in the control over their own lives. Increased purchasing power represents a part of this. More money to spend not only permits the purchase of additional goods and services but greatly widens the choice of goods and services that potentially could be purchased. The poor, if no longer poor, would also gain greater control of various non-fiscal aspects of their lives. As their economic stake in society increases, their political stake is likely to increase as well. They will note more, and thus exercise a greater influence in municipal, local, state, and federal elections. As a result, elected officials will respond to them more effectively. Agencies of government—police, fire, sanitation, streets, parks, and so forth—will also respond more promptly and effectively. Public school systems in particular will be more responsive. The former poor who dislike the education their children are getting in public schools will have an increased ability to " vote with the dollars " by enrolling their children in previously unaffordable private schools or moving to living quarters in previously unaffordable communities. Responding to the former poor will become a matter of survival for the teachers and administrators who depend for their livelihood on the public schools.
While the benefits to the poor of enjoying a right not to be poor may for the most part be obvious, some potential disadvantages—to them — should also be considered. First, will not the creation of a right not to be poor reduce the motivation of the poor to exert themselves to get out of poverty? It is arguable that to the extent that self-help is rendered unnecessary to achieve a minimum living standard, many of the poor will refrain from enrolling in the schools, undertaking the enterprises, and in general taking the risks that today elevate many of them not only above the poverty line but into the middle class and beyond. The establishment of a right not to be poor could result, arguably, in the poor as a whole—or at least a substantial percentage of them—ending up economically worse off in the long run. Second, to the extent that a guarantee of non-poverty reduces the poor’s incentive to exert themselves, will there not be a parallel reduction in their innovative contributions to the economic well-being of our entire society—including the well-being of the former poor along with the well-being of the rest of us? In other words, a guarantee of non-poverty may arguably induce the poor child — whose deprivation would otherwise have spurred the child to graduate from high school, finish college, get a Ph.D. in physics, and win the Nobel Prize for devising a way to produce cheaper energy — to refrain, because of the security offered by the guarantee, from embarking on a course that would greatly benefit all former poor people as well as society as a whole.
It can be inferred from the first paragraph that______.
选项
A、the benefits excel definitely the costs from the perspective of the poor
B、the costs excel the benefits definitely from the perspective of the poor
C、the benefits to poor people of no longer being poor would be enormous
D、the benefits excel the costs is not absolute
答案
C
解析
推断题目。解题点在文章第一段。第一段中举了大量的例子说明脱离贫困后,穷人生活的改善情况,包括经济方面的以及非经济方面的。因此,正确答案是C选项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/xEmO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Atpresent,Chinahassignedmany______tradeagreementswithothercountries.
Itisunwiseforthegovernmentto______thegrowingdissatisfactionwithitseconomicpolicies.
Governmentsthatwanttheirpeopletoprosperintheburgeoningworldeconomyshouldguaranteetwobasicfights:therighttopr
Whatdoconsumersreallywant?That’saquestionmarketresearcherswouldlovetoanswer.Butsincepeopledon’talwayssaywhat
Whatdoconsumersreallywant?That’saquestionmarketresearcherswouldlovetoanswer.Butsincepeopledon’talwayssaywhat
21.Wemightbeinclinedtoattributetotheactofthinkingcompletefromlanguageiftheindividualformedorwereabletofor
Opponentsofaffirmativeactionsaythebattleovertheuseofraceincollegeadmissionsishardlyover,despitetheSupremeCo
Increasingnumbersofpeoplehavemigratedfromthecountrysideandmovedintotownsandcitesover【B1】______.Mostareintile
Itisnotoftenrealizedthatwomen【1】ahighplaceinsouthernEuropeansocietiesinthe10thand11thcenturies.Asa【2】,thew
Atthepresenttime,98percentoftheworldenergyconsumptioncomesfromstoredsources,suchasfossilfuelsornuclearfuel.
随机试题
女性,42岁,行单侧甲状腺大部分切除术。术后4小时,病人先主诉胸闷、气急,随后出现颈部增粗,呼吸困难,发绀。问:该病人出现呼吸困难的原因是什么?
简述中国封建社会的主要矛盾和基本特点。
Weallhopehe’llsoon______hisdisappointmentandbehappyagain.
A.扶土抑木B.培土生金C.滋水涵木D.补火暖土用参苓白术散治疗肺虚,久咳,所体现的做法是
男性,60岁。咳嗽1月、咯血丝痰2周,伴消瘦,无发热、胸闷、气促,吸烟50年,20支/日。该例应首选下列哪项检查
一般用于固定标本的荧光抗体的荧光素与蛋白质结合比率(F/P)值应为
金某在因走私罪被判刑前所犯盗窃罪应当如何处理?如果金某在犯前述盗窃罪后公安机关已经立案侦查,而金某因逃往外地而未被立案的公安机关抓获,则对金某又当如何处罚?
甲盗窃黄金200两,因害怕法律制裁,将黄金密藏20年之久,甲密藏黄金的行为属于( )。
人们由于飞鸟的启发发明了飞机,这说明了原型启发的作用。
下列行政行为中,不属于行政确认的形式的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)