首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
职业资格
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same.
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same.
admin
2021-06-06
70
问题
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same. That is, we marry the wrong person. So here is the question, why will we marry the wrong person?
For most of recorded history, people married for logical sorts of reasons: because her parcel of land adjoined yours, his family had a flourishing business, her father was the magistrate in town, there was a castle to keep up, or both sets of parents subscribed to the same interpretation of a holy text. And from such reasonable marriages, there flowed loneliness, infidelity, abuse, hardness of heart and screams heard through the nursery doors. The marriage of reason was not, in hindsight, reasonable at all; it was often expedient, narrow-minded, snobbish and exploitative. That is why what has replaced it—the marriage of feeling—has largely been spared the need to account for itself.
What matters in the marriage of feeling is that two people are drawn to each other by an overwhelming instinct and know in their hearts that it is right. Indeed, the more imprudent a marriage appears (perhaps it’s been only six months since they met; one of them has no job or both are barely out of their teens), the safer it can feel.
But though we believe ourselves to be seeking happiness in marriage, it isn’t that simple. What we really seek is familiarity—which may well complicate any plans we might have had for happiness. We are looking to recreate, within our adult relationships, the feelings we knew so well in childhood. The love most of us will have tasted early on was often confused with other more destructive dynamics: feelings of wanting to help an adult who was out of control, of being deprived of a parent’s warmth or scared of his anger, of not feeling secure enough to communicate our wishes. How logical, then, that we should as grown-ups find ourselves rejecting certain candidates for marriage not because they are wrong but because they are too right—too balanced, mature, understanding and reliable—given that in our hearts, such Tightness feels foreign. We marry the wrong people because we don’t associate being loved with feeling of happiness.
Finally, we marry to make a nice feeling permanent. We imagine that marriage will help us to bottle the joy we felt when the thought of proposing first came to us: Perhaps we were in Venice, on the lagoon, in a motorboat, with the evening sun throwing glitter across the sea, chatting about aspects of our souls no one ever seemed to have grasped before, with the prospect of dinner in a risotto place a little later. We married to make such sensations permanent but failed to see that there was no solid connection between these feelings and the institution of marriage.
The good news is that it doesn’t matter if we find we have married the wrong person. We mustn’t abandon him or her, only the founding romantic idea upon which the Western understanding of marriage has been based the last 250 years: that a perfect being exists who can meet all our needs and satisfy our every yearning. We need to swap the romantic view for a tragic (and at points comedic) awareness that every human will frustrate, anger, annoy, madden and disappoint us—and we will (without any malice)
do the same to them
.
The person who is best suited to us is not the person who shares our every taste (he or she doesn’t exist), but the person who can negotiate differences in taste intelligently—the person who is good at disagreement. Rather than some notional idea of perfect complementarity, it is the capacity to tolerate differences with generosity that is the true marker of the "not overly wrong" person. Compatibility is an achievement of love; it must not be its precondition.
Which of the following is the key to a happy marriage according to the passage?
选项
A、Commonalities in every taste.
B、Mutual attraction at first sight.
C、Generosity in fixing differences.
D、Complementarity in most aspects.
答案
C
解析
细节题。A项“拥有共同的喜好”,B项“一见钟情”,C项“大度地解决分歧”,D项“在很多方面互补”。根据最后一段可知,真正适合自己的人不是和我们喜好都相同的人,而是能够大度地容忍差异的人。A项错误,C项正确。找到这样一个合适的人是一段幸福婚姻的关键。互补是爱情的成果,而非前提。D项错误。B项原文未提及。故本题选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/wZjD777K
本试题收录于:
英语学科知识与教学能力题库教师资格分类
0
英语学科知识与教学能力
教师资格
相关试题推荐
如果家长同意,可以把儿童带出去活动。()
在带团工作前,导游领队人员应熟悉团队成员、旅游产品、旅游目的地的基本情况,为恰当引导旅游者做好准备,这是()的要求。
对个体散客,以采取独白式的形式进行导游服务。()
导游人员运用突出重点法讲解神农架,对华侨及港澳台同胞重点介绍祭坛,讲解炎帝尝百草、搭架采药的壮举;对青年学生则把重点放在神农架自然博物馆向他们介绍珙桐、金丝猴等珍稀动植物;对喜欢逐新猎奇的游客,着重介绍神农架的“野人”之谜。这是突出了(
Waitrosehasunveileditsvisionofenvironmentallyconsciousshopping,offeringcustomersthechancetobuyfoodanddrinkthat
WhichofthefollowingshowstheproperpronunciationoftheEnglishconsonantgroup"spl"intheword"splash"?
What’shappening:Withglobalpopulationlevelssettoreachcloseto10billionpeopleby2050,theecologicalimpactofth
It’soneofourcommonbeliefsthatmiceareafraidofcats.Scientistshavelongknownthatevenifamousehasneverseenaca
It’soneofourcommonbeliefsthatmiceareafraidofcats.Scientistshavelongknownthatevenifamousehasneverseenaca
Childrenwhospendmorethantwohoursadayatacomputerorwatchingtelevisionaremorelikelythanotherstohavementalpro
随机试题
中碳钢的焊接工艺及操作注意事项是怎样的?
简述霍桑试验的结论。
此患儿目前最可能的主要诊断应是假设此患儿清晨突然面色苍白、神志不清、体温不升、呼吸暂停。首先应考虑最可能的原因是
A、旋转试验B、画圆试验C、轮替试验D、还原试验E、握拳试验嘱患者与评定者相对而坐(或站),患者双上肢先前屈90°,然后按照评定者的指令将上肢继续前屈至180°,再还原到90°,或将上肢放回身体一侧(0°),再还原至90°
多电子原子中同一电子层原子轨道能级(量)最高的亚层是:
“举一反三”和“触类旁通”所说的是()。
根据上图,2005年至2013年,城市最低生活保障人数年增长率最高的年份是哪一年?
随着时间的推移.新一代农民开始_________自己的打工生涯,并希望能融入城市,走出农民工这个身份模糊的地带。填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是()。
已知Java语句double[][]balances=newdouble[NYEARS][NRATES];数组balances是【】维数组。
Weshoulddress______duringtheentiretrip.AccordingtoStep3,weshouldbepreparedand______.
最新回复
(
0
)