首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Violence in films has been a hot topic ever since the silent era, but it’s never going to go away. Some sections of the audience
Violence in films has been a hot topic ever since the silent era, but it’s never going to go away. Some sections of the audience
admin
2020-09-01
53
问题
Violence in films has been a hot topic ever since the silent era, but it’s never going to go away. Some sections of the audience love a bit of vicarious blood and gore. But there’s little doubt that excessive violent films don’t come without bad consequences. This question has been debated for decades. The following are opinions from different sides. Read the excerpts carefully and write your response in NO LESS THAN 300 WORDS, in which you should:
1. summarize briefly the opinions from different sides;
2. give your comment.
Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
Write your article on ANSWER SHEET FOUR.
Excerpt 1
Psychotherapists
Stephannoi (the UK) : Violent movies should be banned because you can compare violent scenes in the movie to real life. The more violent scenes you see, the more aggressive you will get. And violent movies don’t make people productive or smart.
Onceaknight (Canada) : Humans are affected by their surroundings. It’s time to accept that we were under the influence of what we see and feel. A non-violent person can turn into a violent one with enough exposure to violent media. Simply saying that "they have a choice" doesn’t solve the problem. Not all people are philosophers to tell the right from the wrong accurately, and if we allow them to become violent, other people will be put at harm.
Excerpt 2
Parents
Bandito (the US) : Violent television shows should be banned because younger children are likely to be influenced and when they grow up they might think it is right to do something wrong because someone on a television show did it. Also sometimes in violent films there are a lot of gruesome sights which normal kids would think disgusting.
Xuedong (China): Violent films may need regulations regarding who should be allowed to watch them, and I do not feel that they should be banned. People always have a choice when it comes to what they decide to watch, and what they want their children to watch. The television can be turned off if I feel something is too violent for my children.
Excerpt 3
Violent Movie Lovers
Raton (Italy): If we ban violent movies, then what will happen to those who love violent movies? Imagining that many people would stop watching movies, there will be a great fall in the entertainment industry. Recent studies show that 70% of the people like to watch violent movies.
Gooddog (Singapore): Banning violent movies will lead to mass unemployment. Many stuntmen, junior artists, etc., will be unemployed and they will only have some petty leftover jobs which do not pay well. Many will fall to poverty. And the lack of teens and adults who like to watch these films will bring the entertainment industry to a downfall due to the bad economic conditions. Hence, violent movies should not be banned.
Waitonesec (the US): Violent films should not be banned. There should, however, be regulations in more detail for the audience before they watch the movie. For instance, the violent movie need to clearly show the audience what some of those violent scenes are, so as to persuade people to watch the movie or not.
PPsally (the UK): People should have the right to watch whatever they want. Horror slashers are so funny that they get us into the spirit of Halloween. Action and shooting movies are exiting and thrilling which keep life more interesting. I love those movies, so do others. Thus, they should not be banned.
选项
答案
Should We Ban Violent Films? With the help of special effect technology in the media industry, violent elements in movies are more and more thrilling and exciting for the audience. Could the violence in films contribute to the violence in society? This question has been debated for decades. People’s opinions vary greatly considering their different standpoints. Psychotherapists seem to have sound reasons to suggest that there is an apparent cause-and-effect relation between the excessive exposure to violent media and the aggressiveness in one’s real life. Besides, some parents support the idea of banning violent movies by claiming that children may imitate the violent behavior in the scenarios, though others believe that the negative influence has been too much exaggerated. The viewpoint of the latter group is surely in concert with that of those violent movie lovers, who declare that banning violent movies will lead to a great fall of entertainment industry and massive unemployment. Considering all the arguments, I don’t think we should simply and hastily eliminate and ban all the violent films. On the one hand, violence has always been with us and probably always will be. Over the last 18 years, it is said that 32,000 murders and 40,000 attempted murders have been witnessed by normal TV viewers. Eliminating all of them is not in keeping with the reality of human condition. On the other hand, the cause-and-effect relation between media violence and real life violence is not as readily apparent. Only a small percentage of those who watch the violent films are responsible for violent actions. And I believe there are many other reasons accounting for the crimes committed by a violent criminal, such as extreme anger, easy access to guns, indifferent and amoral attitude towards others’ lives, etc. We should not lay all the blames on the violence in entertainment industry. Therefore, I suggest that we set up a violence rating system on the media as we do on sexual contents in movies, so that people will know which level of violence they are accessing to. In Canada, a device called "V-chip" allows parents to lock out TV programming when they consider objectionable to their children. That’s a good policy for parents.
解析
本题讨论暴力电影是否应该被禁止,属于社会生活类话题。本题要求简要概括所给材料中的各方观点,并发表自己的评论。在具体的写作过程中,考生可以开篇点明这种社会现象,并提出论点:暴力电影是否导致有害影响;第二段简要阐述来自心理治疗师、父母和暴力电影爱好者三方的观点;第三段论述自己对这一现象的看法,并阐明理由;最后一段总结全文,重申论点。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/vzIK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
FiveCommonMistakesinConversationandTheirSolutionsI.NotlisteningA.Problem:mostpeopledon’tlisten—waiteagerlyf
FiveThingsforCollegeGraduatestoKnowI.Degreedoesnot【T1】______youtoajob【T1】______A.Yoursituationaftergraduatio
Now,thesecondcharacteristicofactivelearnersistoreflectoninformationand【T1】______.Beingreflectiveisanimportantp
Thoseofusinvolvedintheinternationalizationofhighereducationrelyonaseriesofassumptionsthatareoftennotsupport
Thoseofusinvolvedintheinternationalizationofhighereducationrelyonaseriesofassumptionsthatareoftennotsupport
There’saschooloflinguisticsthatbelieveslanguagelearningbeginswitha"silentperiod".Justasbabieslearntoproduce
云有云的地方性:中国北部的云厚重,人也同样那么厚重。南部的云活泼,人也同样那么活泼。海边的云幻异,渤海和南海的云又各不相同,正如两处海边的人性情不同。河南、河北的云一片黄,抓一把下来似乎就可以做窝窝头,云粗中有细,人亦粗中有细。湖南的云一片灰,长年挂在天空
过去狗仗人势,只要主人在,狗就要猖狂,就要咬人,就要耀武扬威。现在的情形大变,是人仗狗势,人把名犬牵出来显示自己的身份,狗的品种越名贵,产地越遥远,价格越离谱,血统越纯正,市面上的拥有量和流通量越稀少,主人的面子就越大。女人牵着名狗上路那感觉都不同,女人已
随机试题
Howcanmalwarespecificallydamageacompany’sreputation?
关于肺源性呼吸困难的机制,哪项是错误的
参与尿素循环的氨基酸是
以下关于“根管口”的解释哪个是正确的
2010年《中国药典》一部规定,薄荷药材中叶不得少于()
城市旧城改造、道路拓宽要涉及大量宗地的变更,正确的作业步骤是()。①确定变更范围;②对模拟地图矢量化处理;③野外实地测量;④检查出错误、进行人工修改;⑤对新测的电子地图用软件逐个检查和修改;⑥将变更的数据进行试入库
投标文件中用数字表示的数额与用文字表示的数额不一致时,以()为准。
简论张居正改革。
某主机的IP地址为10.100.100.01/20,其子网掩码是______。
A——WetPaintB——LostandFoundC——NOPhotos D——NOVisitorsE——TollFree
最新回复
(
0
)