首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2010-02-17
101
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields—those having very long wave-lengths—and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer, While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans."
The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects, For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field, the electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about I millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is for from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The view-point of the EPA is ______.
选项
A、there is casual link between electricity and cancer
B、electricity really affects cancer
C、controversial
D、low frequency electromagnetic field is a possible cause of cancer
答案
A
解析
细节理解题。答案在第二段第三句,环保署目前的结论是科学证据指出极低频电磁场——具有长波的电磁场——和白血病,淋巴瘤及脑癌之间有着难以确定的联系,从而说明电和致癌有一定的难以确定的关系。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/uE9K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Thequestionofwhetherlanguagesshapethewaywethinkgobackcenturies;Charlemagneproclaimedthat"tohaveasecond【S1】
Thequestionofwhetherlanguagesshapethewaywethinkgobackcenturies;Charlemagneproclaimedthat"tohaveasecond【S1】
Itneverrainsbutitpours.Justasbossesandboardshavefinallysortedouttheirworstaccountingandcompliancetroubles,a
Itneverrainsbutitpours.Justasbossesandboardshavefinallysortedouttheirworstaccountingandcompliancetroubles,a
It’snosecretthatmanychildrenwouldbehealthierandhappierwithadoptiveparentsthanwiththeparentsthatnaturedealt
TheCompetitionamongproducersofpersonalcomputersisessentiallyaracetogetthebest,mostinnovativeproductstothemar
HowisJackyrecently?
Since1895theNationalTrust(国家文物信托基金会)hasworkedforthepreservationofplacesofhistoricinterestandnaturalbeautyi
Archaeologyhaslongbeenanacceptedtoolforstudyingprehistoriccultures.Relativelyrecentlythesametechniqueshavebeen
Untilrelativelyrecently,sportsfilmsrarelysucceededattheboxoffice.Sportsfilms,whichwereconsideredmoviesforyoung
随机试题
患者女性,29岁,因右下腹痛、腹泻3个月就诊,伴低热,体温波动于37.5~38.5℃之间。结肠镜检查在末段回肠发现环形溃疡及狭窄,胸片发现右上肺陈旧结核。最可能的诊断是
属于合法用药的非医学目的是
现行《中国人民解放军测绘条例》是由中央军委()1月10B颁布。
某建设工程采用工程量清单计价方式计价,根据《建筑安装工程费用项目组成》和《建设工程工程量清单计价规范》组价。施工招标过程中,投标人在研究招标文件后认为,招标范围内的一个主要分部分项工程采用了新工艺,无现成可以参考的成本和报价,需要单独测算其综合单价。[20
旅游的本质就是一种探求文化的活动。()
俗话说“装龙像龙,装虎像虎”。演员演岳飞就应该像岳飞,演秦桧就应该像秦桧,要做到“非我”。但只是像岳飞像秦桧,而不能也不应该使自己就变成岳飞,变成秦桧。演员不应该完全丢掉自己。他仍应该让人透过他的表演,感知到他对他所演的角色的爱憎感情,而完成他的最高任务。
“闪婚”是指男女双方恋爱不到半年就结婚。某研究所对某市法院审理的所有离婚案件作了调查。结果显示,闪婚夫妻三年内起诉离婚的比例远远高于非闪婚夫妻。由此,该研究机构认为闪婚是目前夫妻离婚的一个重要原因。下列哪项如果为真,最能削弱以上论证?
一个研究小组以大白鼠为对象进行实验,在大白鼠想要食物或水的时候,不马上提供,而是让它们等一段时间,研究人员发现,实验鼠在等待的时候,其大脑内分泌血清素的神经细胞会变得活跃,分泌血清素的频率提高到正常情况下的3倍左右,脑内血清素的浓度也相应升高。研究人员认为
中国历史上第一部正式颁布的宪法是()。
TheCaseoftheDisappearingFingerprintsOneusefulanti-cancerdrugcaneffectivelyerasethewhorlsandothercharacteris
最新回复
(
0
)