首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
104
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
According to the author, all the students know that______.
选项
A、it is too dull to attend lectures
B、quite a lot of teachers can produce the results students desire
C、they must be inspired to learn
D、there are great differences among the lecturers as to their quality of teaching
答案
D
解析
参考文章第一句,“the quality of lecturers varies greatly”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/u6iC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
WhatdowemeanbyaperfectEnglishpronunciation?InonesensethereareasmanydifferentkindsofEnglishastherearespeak
Yourbody,whichhascloserelationswiththefoodyoueat,isthemostimportantthingyouown,soitneedspropertreatmentan
Oureatinghabitsareveryimportantforgoodhealthandastrongbody.Therearetimeswhenmostofuswouldrathereatsweets
HowtoSelectaHomeComputerComputersareveryversatile.Theycandomanythingssuchasteaching,playinggames,orhelp
I’mseventeen.IhadworkedasaboxboyatasupermarketinLeangles.Peoplecametothecounterandyouputthingsintheirba
ThenorthernpartsoftheUnitedStatesgetverycoldinthewinter.Itsnowsagreatdealandthetemperatureoftengoes【C1】___
Willyou______myclotheswhileIgoforaswim?
Notuntil______thewholethingtohim______thathewaswrong.
Sandycoulddonothingbut______tohisteacherthathewaswrong.
Athiefwhobrokeintoachurchwascaughtbecausetracesofwax,foundonhisclothes,______fromthesortofcandlesusedonly
随机试题
胸内异位组织肿瘤包括
非创伤性修复治疗的一般步骤是()
关于我国的选举制度,下列说法中不正确的是哪一项?()
在受压容器内可燃气体爆炸极限受多种因素的影响而变化,其主要因素是()。
某建筑公司根据施工需要,委托加工厂加工构件,后由于意外情况,建筑公司通知加工厂取消合同;加工厂认为自己已经完成了60%的工作,应当继续履行合同;则下列说法中正确的是()。
()是指人们从事某种活动,为某一目标付出努力的意愿。
某基金会于年末结转净资产,2014年至2015年发生下列业务:(1)2014年10月6日,收到甲公司500万元的现金捐赠,甲公司要求该基金会在2015年内使用该款项资助贫困母亲。(2)2014年11月8日,收到乙公司800万元的现金捐赠,乙公司
被誉为全球最大的“露天历史博物馆”的城市是()。
某小学修建新教学大楼,要求每名新生家长缴纳3000元集资款,并承诺学生毕业后集资款返还。该学校的做法()。
Thereisvirtuallynolimittohowonecanservecommunityinterests,fromspendingafewhoursaweekwithsomecharitableorga
最新回复
(
0
)