首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
103
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
According to the author, all the students know that______.
选项
A、it is too dull to attend lectures
B、quite a lot of teachers can produce the results students desire
C、they must be inspired to learn
D、there are great differences among the lecturers as to their quality of teaching
答案
D
解析
参考文章第一句,“the quality of lecturers varies greatly”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/u6iC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Animportantbusinessmanwasaskedtogiveatwenty-minutespeechinanothercity.Hewastoobusytowriteithimself,soheas
Whenyoufly,flywithBelAir.PeoplewhotravelalotflywithBelAir,becausetheyknowtheywillgetwhattheywant.
WhatdowemeanbyaperfectEnglishpronunciation?InonesensethereareasmanydifferentkindsofEnglishastherearespeak
Economies,severalcoursesofwhichIhavetakenthusfar,______tobedifficultbutusefulforalmostallstudents.
CalifornianMichaelSchwabesaidgoodbyetothegaspumptwoyearsago.Heleasedanelectriccar.Schwabesayshegetsmoreout
ThenorthernpartsoftheUnitedStatesgetverycoldinthewinter.Itsnowsagreatdealandthetemperatureoftengoes【C1】___
Willyou______myclotheswhileIgoforaswim?
UncleSamisatall,thinman.He’saneldermanwithwhitehairandawhitebeard.Heoftenwearsatallhat,abowtie,andth
______intheopenair,wetclothescangetdryeasily.
We’ve______sugar.Askhimtolendussome.
随机试题
授予代理权的一方当事人在______可以终止代理权。
下列哪种方式是药物通过生物膜转运的主要方式
采用随机、对照和双盲试验研究方法的文献,属于()。
根据我国现行《建筑安装工程费用项目组成》的规定,直接从事建筑安装工程施工的生产工人的福利费应计入()。
在对连续信号均匀采样时,要从离散采样值不失真恢复原信号,则采样角频率ΩS与信号最高截止频率ΩC应满足关系()。
个人汽车贷款所购车辆为二手车的,贷款额度不得超过借款人所购汽车价格的60%。()
关于赠与,下列表述最为准确、全面的是()。
恐龙的灭绝是生物学家们一直感兴趣的研究课题,但无论把它_______于地壳的运动、火山的爆发、气候的变化、新生代第三季的来临乃至是星外来客,都有许多难以_______的地方,唯有“物种的老化”这一原因是所有研究者们所公认存在的。依次填入画横线部分最恰当的
一条生产线生产的产品正品率为p(0<p<1),连续检查5件,X表示在查到次品之前已经取到的正品数,求X的数学期望.(在两次检查之间各件产品的质量互不影响)
PassageFour(1)Trainingtobecomeabarristerorsolicitorisacompetitiveandexpensivebusiness.Thelegalprofession
最新回复
(
0
)