首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
106
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
According to the author, all the students know that______.
选项
A、it is too dull to attend lectures
B、quite a lot of teachers can produce the results students desire
C、they must be inspired to learn
D、there are great differences among the lecturers as to their quality of teaching
答案
D
解析
参考文章第一句,“the quality of lecturers varies greatly”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/u6iC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
WhatdowemeanbyaperfectEnglishpronunciation?InonesensethereareasmanydifferentkindsofEnglishastherearespeak
WhatdowemeanbyaperfectEnglishpronunciation?InonesensethereareasmanydifferentkindsofEnglishastherearespeak
UncleSamisatall,thinman.He’sanoldermanwithwhitehairandawhitebeard.Heoftenwearsatallhat,abowtie,andth
Eversincehumanshaveliveontheearth,theyhavemadeuseofvariousformsofcommunication.Generally,thisexpressionofth
Eversincehumanshaveliveontheearth,theyhavemadeuseofvariousformsofcommunication.Generally,thisexpressionofth
Normallyastudentmustattendacertainnumberofcoursesinordertograduate,andeachcoursewhichheattendsgivesacredit
Theyear2000willbringbigchangesincommunication.Cellphoneswillbesmallenoughtocarryinyourpocket.Videophoneswil
Humanneedsseemendless.Theymightberegardedasmakingupseverallevels.Whenthereisenoughmoneytosatisfyonelevelof
Shoppingforclothesisnotthesameexperienceforamanasitisforawoman.Amangoesshoppingbecauseheneedssomething.
______intheopenair,wetclothescangetdryeasily.
随机试题
直肠溃疡肠重叠
A.11~12小时B.6~8小时C.1小时D.1~2小时E.5~15分钟
抑制胆碱酯酶活性的药物属于
不符合脑震荡的表现是
在支流、干流汇合的河段上取水,为防止所取的水泥沙含量过高或泥沙淤积,取水构筑物取水口位置宜设置在()。
设λ1,λ2是矩阵A的两个不同的特征值,ξ,η是A的分别属于λ1,λ2的特征向量,则以下选项中正确的是()。
有位中学教师经常外出开会,班级管理完全交给学生自己,纪律居然井然有序。这一教师的领导最可能属于()。
软件设计模块化的目的是【】。
ShoppinghabitsintheUnitedStateshavechangedgreatlyinthelastquarterofthe20thcentury.【C1】______inthe1900smostA
Itwouldbeinterestingtodiscoverhowmanyyoungpeoplegotouniversitywithoutanyclearideaofwhattheyaregoingtodoa
最新回复
(
0
)