首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
105
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
According to the author, all the students know that______.
选项
A、it is too dull to attend lectures
B、quite a lot of teachers can produce the results students desire
C、they must be inspired to learn
D、there are great differences among the lecturers as to their quality of teaching
答案
D
解析
参考文章第一句,“the quality of lecturers varies greatly”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/u6iC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
SupposeyouworkinabigfirmandfindEnglishveryimportantforyourjobbecauseyouoftendealwithforeignbusinessmen.Now
Eversincehumanshaveliveontheearth,theyhavemadeuseofvariousformsofcommunication.Generally,thisexpressionofth
Normallyastudentmustattendacertainnumberofcoursesinordertograduate,andeachcoursewhichheattendsgivesacredit
HowtoSelectaHomeComputerComputersareveryversatile.Theycandomanythingssuchasteaching,playinggames,orhelp
Canadaisthesecondlargestcountryintheworldinarea,althoughits【1】isonlysome25million,most【2】ina200-milestrip【3】
Canadaisthesecondlargestcountryintheworldinarea,althoughits【1】isonlysome25million,most【2】ina200-milestrip【3】
ThenorthernpartsoftheUnitedStatesgetverycoldinthewinter.Itsnowsagreatdealandthetemperatureoftengoes【C1】___
Sandycoulddonothingbut______tohisteacherthathewaswrong.
Willyou______myclotheswhileIgoforaswim?
随机试题
以下物质能作为基准物质的是()。
以下疾病中,最容易并发脑血管栓塞的是()
2004年6月某星期天,甲运输公司司机乙在为公司拉货时,因为饮酒,开车将丙撞成重伤,乙肇事后逃跑。丙躺于地,神志不清,丁路过,见状,拦起一辆出租车,掏出50元给(个体)司机戊,要求司机将伤者拉往已医院救治,司机答应,并将丙拉到该医院门诊室,值班医生庚在二
买受人因拍卖标的存在瑕疵未声明的,在多长的时间内可以通过诉讼的方式请求赔偿?()
“生产成本”账户的贷方期末余额表示在产品成本。()
证券经纪业务营销人员在所服务证券公司的授权范围内从事客户招揽和客户服务等活动时,应()。Ⅰ.如实向客户传递所服务证券公司统一提供的研究报告及与证券投资有关的信息Ⅱ.向客户充分提示证券投资的风险Ⅲ.清晰、准确、客观地向客
客观事物不在眼前时,人们在大脑中重现出来的事物的形象称为()
微分方程y’=的通解是_________.
Wherewasthelionliving?
AUNESCOWorldCulturalHeritageSite,theTerracottaWarriorsandHorsesMuseumistheincrediblelegacyofthefirstemperoro
最新回复
(
0
)