首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
admin
2017-04-21
127
问题
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. These studies have disclosed that the judgments of interviewers differ markedly and bear little or no relationship to the adequacy of job applicants.
Of the many reasons why this should be the case, three in particular stand out. The first reason is related to an error of judgment known as the halo effect. If a person has one noticeable good trait, their other characteristics will be judged as better than they really are. Thus, an individual who dresses smartly and shows self-confidence is likely to be judged capable of doing a job well regardless of his or her real ability.
Interviewers are also prejudiced by an effect called the primacy effect. This error occurs when interpretation of later information is distorted by earlier connected information. Hence, in an interview situation, the interviewer spends most of the interview trying to confirm the impression given by the candidate in the first few moments. Studies have repeatedly demonstrated that such an impression is unrelated to the aptitude of the applicant.
The phenomenon known as the contrast effect also skews the judgment of interviewers. A suitable candidate may be underestimated because he or she contrasts with a previous one who appears exceptionally intelligent. Likewise, an average candidate who is preceded by one who gives a weak showing may be judged as more suitable than he or she really is.
Since interviews as a form of personnel selection have been shown to be inadequate, other selection procedures have been devised which more accurately predict candidate suitability. Of the various tests devised, the predictor which appears to do this most successfully is cognitive ability as measured by a variety of verbal and spatial tests.
All of the following statements about the halo effect are false EXCEPT ______.
选项
A、it is the worst judgmental error
B、it works only when an interviewee dressed smartly and is self-confident
C、it exemplifies how one good characteristic colors perceptions
D、it contributes to the adequacy of interviewing job applicants
答案
C
解析
本题是判断题。由第1段的后半段可以推出:光圈效应意味着如果一个人具有某种显著的优点,这就会影响他人的感知和判断,从而是被认为具有其他并不一定存在的优点。而文中没有提到光圈效应是否是造成最严重的判断错误;一个人穿戴时髦仅仅是产生光圈效应的一个例子;所以A和B错误,应该排除。D与文章所论述的观点恰恰相反,也应该排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/qW9d777K
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
JohnWilliams,personneldirectorofacompany,receivesanapplicationfromJackSmithapplyingforapositioninthecompanyb
Togenerateinterestinitsbusinessgifts,ABCcompanytakesanadintheJulyissueofPersonnelInternational,invitingreade
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Doctorsaresurethatmoretest-tubebabiesaregirlsthanboys.Doctorswillmakemoretest-tubebabyexperiments.
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.Hamstershavesleepingproblems.
随机试题
组织行为学的两重性来源于
郁达夫所创作的散文名篇有
两人搬运患者的正确方法是()。
A.炮姜B.白及C.大蓟D.阿胶E.三七能活血止血的药是
焦炉烟道气调湿机在正常生产过程中,为防止干燥床排气凝露,控制其温度不应低于()。
在投资计划值的香蕉图中,最右侧的曲线表示的是所有活动按()。
中国公民张某系一大学教授,2012年度取得的收入情况如下:(1)每月取得工资收入5600元。(2)一次性取得设计收入2万元,缴税前从中依次拿出6000元、5000元,通过国家机关分别捐给了农村义务教育和贫困地区。(3)出版专著一部,出版社支付稿酬l0万元。
不享受当年年休假的情形包括()。
借助现代化科学手段,信息一秒钟可以到达月球,可以绕地球七圈半,等发现了错误再纠正,收到信息者可能已经关闭了收音机。未来社会的信息过剩,一如生产过剩带来经济危机一样,很可能是人类进步所付出的必然代价;信息过剩和信息的快速传播将导致信息的贬值。文段主要
Sinceshewasaccustomedtohavingherownroom,ithasdifficultforherto______aroommate.
最新回复
(
0
)