首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
admin
2017-04-21
130
问题
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. These studies have disclosed that the judgments of interviewers differ markedly and bear little or no relationship to the adequacy of job applicants.
Of the many reasons why this should be the case, three in particular stand out. The first reason is related to an error of judgment known as the halo effect. If a person has one noticeable good trait, their other characteristics will be judged as better than they really are. Thus, an individual who dresses smartly and shows self-confidence is likely to be judged capable of doing a job well regardless of his or her real ability.
Interviewers are also prejudiced by an effect called the primacy effect. This error occurs when interpretation of later information is distorted by earlier connected information. Hence, in an interview situation, the interviewer spends most of the interview trying to confirm the impression given by the candidate in the first few moments. Studies have repeatedly demonstrated that such an impression is unrelated to the aptitude of the applicant.
The phenomenon known as the contrast effect also skews the judgment of interviewers. A suitable candidate may be underestimated because he or she contrasts with a previous one who appears exceptionally intelligent. Likewise, an average candidate who is preceded by one who gives a weak showing may be judged as more suitable than he or she really is.
Since interviews as a form of personnel selection have been shown to be inadequate, other selection procedures have been devised which more accurately predict candidate suitability. Of the various tests devised, the predictor which appears to do this most successfully is cognitive ability as measured by a variety of verbal and spatial tests.
Which one is true about cognitive test?
选项
A、It tests the applicant’s verbal ability.
B、It tests the applicant’s spatial ability.
C、It is a more reliable way to test applicant suitability.
D、It is a hindrance to personnel selection.
答案
C
解析
本题是判断题。文中最后一段提到,由于3种心理效应的影响,仅仅靠面试来判断应聘者还是不够的,所以设计了其他的挑选方法来提高判断的准确性。认知能力测试(考查应聘者的口语能力和空间能力)就是比较成功的一种。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/cW9d777K
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.Biologicalclocktellstime.
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.Scientistsarecrueltodoexperimentswithhamsters.
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.SCNplaysaroleindailyrhythms.
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.Thenormalhamstershadadailycycleof24hour,andthem
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.theidentificationoftheinternalclockmayhelptoreliev
随机试题
Access是一个关系型数据库管理系统,它通过各种数据库对象管理信息。
属于注射剂一般检查的是属于片剂一般检查的是
下列治疗便秘的药物中,属于处方药的是()。
患者,男性,腹泻3天,来院时精神差,口唇樱红,呼吸深快,呼气有酮味。护士根据患者情况考虑其可能是
甲为了获取超额利润,在明知其所经销的电器产品不符合保障人身安全的国家标准的情况下,仍然大量进货销售,销售金额总计达到180万元。一企业因使用这种电器而导致短路,引起火灾,造成3人轻伤,部分厂房被烧毁,直接经济损失10万元。下列关于甲的行为的说法哪些是正确的
企业改革涉及的划拨土地使用权,有()情形之一的,应当采取出让或者租赁的方式处置。
教学的主要任务在于传授对实际有用的知识,至于学生智力开发无需特别训练,这是形式教育论的观点。()
若设定贴现率为i时,NPV>0,则()。
电影艺术
直线L与直线y=2、x=6分别交于点P、Q,且线段QP的中点坐标为(1,-2),则直线L的斜率为
最新回复
(
0
)