首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
admin
2017-04-21
129
问题
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. These studies have disclosed that the judgments of interviewers differ markedly and bear little or no relationship to the adequacy of job applicants.
Of the many reasons why this should be the case, three in particular stand out. The first reason is related to an error of judgment known as the halo effect. If a person has one noticeable good trait, their other characteristics will be judged as better than they really are. Thus, an individual who dresses smartly and shows self-confidence is likely to be judged capable of doing a job well regardless of his or her real ability.
Interviewers are also prejudiced by an effect called the primacy effect. This error occurs when interpretation of later information is distorted by earlier connected information. Hence, in an interview situation, the interviewer spends most of the interview trying to confirm the impression given by the candidate in the first few moments. Studies have repeatedly demonstrated that such an impression is unrelated to the aptitude of the applicant.
The phenomenon known as the contrast effect also skews the judgment of interviewers. A suitable candidate may be underestimated because he or she contrasts with a previous one who appears exceptionally intelligent. Likewise, an average candidate who is preceded by one who gives a weak showing may be judged as more suitable than he or she really is.
Since interviews as a form of personnel selection have been shown to be inadequate, other selection procedures have been devised which more accurately predict candidate suitability. Of the various tests devised, the predictor which appears to do this most successfully is cognitive ability as measured by a variety of verbal and spatial tests.
Which of the following is NOT the reason of inadequacy of interview?
选项
A、Halo effect.
B、Primacy effect.
C、Contrast effect.
D、Cognitive effect.
答案
D
解析
本题是细节题。文章的前3段分别阐述了面试考官容易受到的3种心理因素的影响,即光圈效应、首位效应和对比效应。而认知效应并不是影响考官判断偏差的心理因素。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/lW9d777K
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
JohnWilliams,personneldirectorofacompany,receivesanapplicationfromJackSmithapplyingforapositioninthecompanyb
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Mr.Cousinsgotsickafterreturningfrom______.Whatdidn’tMr.Cousinsdoinhisexperimentswithlaughter?
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.Hamstershavesleepingproblems.
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.Biologicalclocktellstime.
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.SCNplaysaroleindailyrhythms.
随机试题
对一组并发进程来说,其中每一个进程都
采用“穴位贴敷法"治疗哮喘的常用穴有
关于脂肪瘤的描述,正确的是
急性脊髓炎的运动障碍特点是
A、丝圈保持器B、远中导板式间隙保持器C、下颌舌弓保持器D、Nance弓保持器E、活动功能保持器第二乳磨牙早失,第一恒磨牙萌于龈下
某公司进口一批货物,装载货物的运输工具从天津申报进境转关,转关货物经海运运抵该公司,该公司在向天津海关申报转关时,应提交的单证是()。
欧洲西部河流发展航运具有许多优越的条件,从自然因素考虑是因为欧洲西部()。
当国内群众生活必需的某种商品价格发生剧烈变动时.国家发改委可能会对生产这种商品的企业进行约谈,要求它们建立该商品的价格报告制度.定期向国家发改委报送该种商品的市场价格变动状况。这说明()。
被恩格斯称为“全部社会主义文献中传播最广和最具有国际性的著作”,“从西伯利亚到加利福尼亚的干百万工人公认的共同纲领”的是()
通过路由算法,为分组通过通信子网选择最适当的路径是OSI模型中哪一层的任务?
最新回复
(
0
)