首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
职业资格
IF YOU want something done, the saying goes, give it to a busy person. It is an odd way to guarantee hitting deadlines. But a pa
IF YOU want something done, the saying goes, give it to a busy person. It is an odd way to guarantee hitting deadlines. But a pa
admin
2017-04-27
90
问题
IF YOU want something done, the saying goes, give it to a busy person. It is an odd way to guarantee hitting deadlines. But a paper recently published in the Journal of Consumer Research suggests it may, in fact, be true—as long as the busy person conceptualises the deadline in the right way.
Yanping Tu of the University of Chicago and Dilip Soman of the University of Toronto examined how individuals go about both thinking about and completing tasks. Previous studies have shown that such activity progresses through four distinct phases: pre-decision, post-decision(but pre-action), action and review. It is thought that what motivates the shift from the decision-making stages to the doing-something stage is a change in mindset.
Human beings are a deliberative sort, weighing the pros and cons of future actions and remaining open to other ideas and influences. However, once a decision is taken, the mind becomes more "implemental" and focuses on the task at hand. "The mindset towards ’where can I get a sandwich’," explains Ms Tu, "is more implemental than the mindset towards ’should I get a sandwich or not?’"
Ms Tu and Dr Soman advise in their paper that "the key step in getting things done is to get started." But what drives that? They believe the key that unlocks the implemental mode lies in how people categorise time. They suggest that tasks are more likely to be viewed with an implemental mindset if an imposed deadline is cognitively linked to "now"—a so-called like-the-present scenario. That might be a future date within the same month or calendar year, or pegged to an event with a familiar spot in the mind’ s timeline(being given a task at Christmas, say, with a deadline of Easter). Conversely, they suggest, a deadline placed outside such mental constructs(being "unlike-the-present")exists merely as a circle on a calendar, and as such is more likely to be considered deliberatively and then ignored until the last minute.
To
flesh out
this idea, the pair carried out five sets of tests, with volunteers ranging from farmers in India to undergraduate students in Toronto. In one test, the farmers were offered a financial incentive to open a bank account and make a deposit within six months. The researchers predicted those approached in June would consider a deadline before December 31st as like-the-present. those approached in July, by contrast, received a deadline into the next year, and were expected to think of their deadline as unlike-the-present. The distinction worked. Those with a deadline in the same year were nearly four times more likely to open the account immediately as those for whom the deadline lay in the following year. Arbitrary though calendars may be in parsing up the continuous flow of time, humans parse their concept of time in line with
them
.
The effect can manifest itself in even subtler ways. In another set of experiments, undergraduate students were given a calendar on a Wednesday and were asked to suggest an appropriate day to carry out certain tasks before the following Sunday. The trick was that some were given a calendar with all of the weekdays coloured purple, with weekends in beige(making a visual distinction between a Wednesday and the following Sunday). Others were given a calendar in which every other week, Monday to Sunday, was a solid colour(meaning that a Wednesday and the following Sunday were thus in the same week, and in the same colour). Even this minor visual cue affected how like-or unlike-the-present the respondents tended to view task priorities.
These and other bits of framing and trickery in the research support the same thesis: that making people link a future event to today triggers an implemental response, regardless of how far in the future the deadline actually lies. If the journey of 1,000 miles starts with a single step, the authors might suggest that you take that step before this time next week.
Which best describes the author’s tone?
选项
A、Humanistic.
B、Objective.
C、Speculative.
D、Recriminatory.
答案
B
解析
态度题。humanistic“人文主义的”;objective“客观的”;speculative“推理的,思考的”;recriminatory“互相指责的,反控诉的”。全文作者以客观的态度阐述观点,故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/p93v777K
本试题收录于:
英语学科知识与教学能力题库教师资格分类
0
英语学科知识与教学能力
教师资格
相关试题推荐
某教师在进行指南针、火药、印刷术三大发明传播教学中,发给学生相应文献资料,要求学生分析材料,得出结论并在地图上标出路线。这一教学活动培养的能力主要是()
材料:下面是初中某位历史教师关于《三国鼎立》课堂教学内容所做的课堂小结:师:通过老师对本课内容的讲解,谁能回答一下这个问题:三国鼎立局面的出现,是历史的进步还是历史的倒退呢?生:……师:安静一下,大家可以举手示意老师
Thecorrectpronunciationoftheunderlinedlettersintheword"particular"is______.
Whenyoufocuson"utterancefunction"and"expectedresponse"byusingexampleslike"apology/acceptance,inform/acknowledg
Exceptionalchildrenaredifferentinsomesignificantwaysfromothersofthesameage,forthesameage,forthesechildrento
Whichofthefollowingactivitiesdoesnotbelongtopre-readingactivities?
AnneWhitney,asophomoreatColoradoStateUniversity,firsthadaproblemtakingtestswhenshebegancollege."Iwasalwaysw
Donna’sfourthgradeclassroomlookedtypicallytraditional.YetsomethingseemeddifferentthatdaywhenIentereditforthef
—WhereisTom?—He’sleft______sayingthathehassomethingimportanttodo.
ThepairofEnglishphonemes______differintheplaceofarticulation.
随机试题
电子邮件地址的格式是()。
国家对药品不良反应实行
A.精神分裂症B.心境障碍C.慢性酒精中毒所致精神障碍D.可卡因狂E.癫痫所致精神障碍性接触感伴被害妄想多见于
下列不属于氨基糖苷类药物不良反应的是
对本行政区域内的建设工程勘察、设计活动实施监督管理的部门是县级人民政府。()
库区移民专项竣工验收由()组织库区移民专项验收委员会进行。
下列关于流动比率的说法,正确的是()。
公司贷款包括的类型有()。
甲误以失效的农药投毒杀乙,未发生乙死亡的结果。甲的认识错误属于( )。
在考生文件夹下有一个工程文件sjt5.vbp。程序功能如下:1)单击“读数据”按钮,从文件中读出数据,放入二维数组a中。2)单击“生成新数组”按钮时,依据a数组生成b数组;若a数组元素为素数,则直接将a数组元素的值赋给b数组中相同下标的
最新回复
(
0
)