首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
admin
2012-12-01
63
问题
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even create the next Google. Better yet, this plan won’t cost the government a dime. In fact, it will save a lot of money. But few politicians are going to want to touch it. Here’s the plan: More immigration. A pathway to legal status for undocumented immigrants. And a. recognition that immigration policy is economic policy, and needs to be thought of as such.
See what I meant about politicians not liking it?
Economists will tell you that immigrants raise wages for the average native-born worker. They’ll tell you that they make things cheaper for us to buy here, and that if we didn’t have immigrants for some of these jobs, the jobs would move to other countries. They’ll tell you that we should allow for much more highly skilled immigration, because that’s about as close to a free lunch as you’re likely to find. They’ll tell you that the people who should most want a path to legal status for undocumented immigrants are the low-income workers who are most opposed to such plans. And about all this, the economists are right.
There are also noneconomic considerations, of course. Integrating cultures and nationalities is difficult. Undocumented immigrants raise issues of law and fairness. Border security is important. Those questions are important. They’re just not the subject of this column.
The mistake we make when thinking about the effect immigrants have on our wages, says Giovanni Peri, an economist at the University of California at Davis who has studied the issue extensively, is we imagine an economy where the number of jobs is fixed. Then, if one immigrant comes in, he takes one of those jobs or forces a worker to accept a lower wage. But that’s not how our economy works. With more labor—particularly more labor of different kinds—the economy grows larger. It produces more stuff. There are more workers buying things and that increases the total number of jobs. We understand perfectly well that Europe is in trouble because its low birth rates mean fewer workers and that means less economic growth. We ourselves worry that we’re not graduating enough scientists and engineers. But the economy doesn’t care if it gets workers through birth rates or green cards.
In fact, there’s a sense in which green cards are superior. Economists separate new workers into two categories: Those who "substitute" for existing labor—we’re both construction workers, and the boss can easily swap you out for me; and those who "complement" existing labor—you’re a construction engineer and I’m a construction worker. Immigrants, more so than U. S. -born workers, tend to be in the second category, as the jobs you want to give to someone who doesn’t speak English very well and doesn’t have many skills are different from the jobs you give to people who are fluent and have more skills.
But that’s only half of their benefit. "Living standards are a function of two things," says Michael Greenstone, director of the Hamilton Project, which is hosting a Washington conference on the economics of immigration next week. "They’re a function of our wages and the prices of the goods we purchase. " And immigrants reduce the prices of those goods. Patricia Cortes, an economist at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, found that immigrants lowered the prices in "immigrant-intensive industries" like housekeeping and gardening by about 10 percent. So our wages go up and the prices of the things we want to buy go down.
We should remember, though, that the average worker isn’t every worker. A study by Harvard economists George Borjas and Lawrence Katz found that although immigrants raised nitive wages overall, they slightly hurt the 8 percent of workers without a high-school education and those with a college education. A subsequent study by Peri looked harder at the ways immigrant labor differed from native labor and found that all groups of workers saw a benefit from immigrants—though unskilled workers saw less of a benefit than highly skilled workers.
And unskilled workers face even tougher competition from undocumented immigrants who, because their status is so tenuous, will accept pay beneath the minimum wage. And they are unlikely to complain about safety regulations or work conditions. That takes unskilled immigrants from being a bit cheaper than unskilled natives and makes them a lot cheaper—which makes employers likelier to hire them for jobs that native workers could do better.
This suggests, first, that American workers would be better off if we figured out a way to take the 12 million undocumented immigrants and give them legal status, and second, that we might want to give them more direct help if we’re going to increase immigration. Both are possible—just politically difficult.
Our immigration policy should be primarily oriented around our national goals. And one goal is to have the world’s most innovative and dynamic economy. It’s never going to be the case that each and every one of the planet’s most talented individuals is born on American soil. But those born elsewhere could be lured here. People like living here. We should be leveraging that advantage, mercilessly roaming the globe, finding the most talented people and attracting them to our country. When we have the best talent, we have the best innovations. That’s how we landed Google, Intel, and the atomic bomb. Immigrants are about twice as likely as native-born Americans to start a small business, and they’re 30 percent more likely to apply for a patent.
Which of the following is NOT the benefit of immigration?
选项
A、Immigration will help the economy grow and increase the total number of jobs.
B、Immigration will increase the wages and decrease the prices of goods.
C、Immigration will make skilled native workers face even tougher competition.
D、Immigration will attract the most talented people to the country.
答案
C
解析
首先,要看清题目,找出不正确的选项。所给的三个选项A、B和D分别可从第五段、第七段和第十一段中得出均为正确的答案,而选项C与原文第九段内容不符。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/fmaO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Resignationisoftwosorts,onerootedindespair,theotherinunconquerablehope.Themanwhohassufferedsuchfundamentald
AboutWetlandsintheU.S.A.Peopleenjoyafamoussoup(SHE-CRABSOUP)inNorthCarolinabecausethedaysoftheregionalsoup
A、hedidn’twanttoapprovetheresignationofEducationMinister.B、theresignedofficialswantedtheopportunitytoprovethei
Theperiodofadolescence,i.e.,thepersonbetweenchildhoodandadulthood,maybelongorshort,dependingonsocialexpectati
Threeweeksago,astorywepublishedputusinthemiddleofacontroversy.Itwashardlythefirsttimethathashappened,but
HowtoConquerPublicSpeakingFearⅠ.IntroductionA.Publicspeaking—acommonsourceofstressforeveryoneB.Thetru
北京获得2008奥运会的举办权是世界对北京的认同和信任。根据“为人的和谐发展,以促进建立一个维护人的尊严的和平社会”的奥林匹克宗旨,北京提出了“绿色奥运、科技奥运、人文奥运”的举办理念。绿色奥运,就是将环境保护作为奥运设施规划和建设的首要条件。北京
幸福似乎主要是一种内心快乐的状态。不过,它不是一般的快乐,而是非常强烈和深刻的快乐,以至于我们此时此刻会由衷地觉得活着是多么有意思,人生是多么美好。正是因为这样,幸福最直接的体验包含着我们对生命意义的肯定评价。感到幸福,也就是感到自己生命的意义得到了实现。
随机试题
肾小管中排出的氨主要来自
A.月经周期不规则,经期不定B.月经周期规则,经期3~5天C.月经周期稀发,经期5~7天D.月经周期缩短,经期3~5天E.月经周期规则,经期延长子宫内膜不规则脱落
当膀胱括约肌发生麻痹时,一般不会出现下列哪一现象
关于幼儿园总平面设计的说法,错误的是:[2017-47]
导致债权人行使撤销权的债务人行为不包括( )。
甲公司于2013年年末购入一台管理用设备并投入使用。入账价值为403500元,预计使用寿命为10年,预计净残值为3500元,自2014年1月1日起按年限平均法计提折旧。2018年年初,由于技术进步等原因,甲公司将该设备预计使用寿命变更为6年,预计净残值
个人征信查询系统内容中的个人职业信息不包括()。
弹性预算只适用于编制成本预算。()
如果规模报酬不变,长期平均成本等于边际成本且不变。()
第三产业的指数超过人均国内生产总值的年份有()。
最新回复
(
0
)