2. 考研
  3. Twenty-seven years ago, Egypt revised its secular constitution to enshrine Muslim sharia as "the principal source of legislation

Twenty-seven years ago, Egypt revised its secular constitution to enshrine Muslim sharia as "the principal source of legislation

admin2011-03-11  32
问题     Twenty-seven years ago, Egypt revised its secular constitution to enshrine Muslim sharia as "the principal source of legislation". To most citizens, most of the time, that seeming contradiction-between secularism and religion-has not made much difference. Nine in ten Egyptians are Sunni Muslims and expect Islam to govern such things as marriage, divorce and inheritance. Nearly all the rest profess Christianity or Judaism, faiths recognised and protected in Islam. But to the small minority who embrace other faiths, or who have tried to leave Islam, it has, until lately, made an increasingly troubling difference.  
    Members of Egypt’s 2,000-strong Bahai community, for instance, have found they cannot state their religion on the national identity cards that all Egyptians are obliged to produce to secure such things as driver’s licenses, bank accounts, social insurance and state schooling. Hundreds of Coptic Christians who have converted to Islam, often to escape the Orthodox sect’s ban on divorce, find they cannot revert to their original faith. In some cases, children raised as Christians have discovered that, because a divorced parent converted to Islam, they too have become officially Muslim, and cannot claim otherwise.  
    Such restrictions on religious freedom are not directly a product of sharia, say human- rights campaigners, but rather of rigid interpretations of Islamic law by over-zealous officials. In their strict view, Bahai belief cannot be recognised as a legitimate faith, since it arose in the 19th century, long after Islam staked its claim to be the final revelation in a chain of prophecies beginning with Adam. Likewise, they brand any attempt to leave Islam, whatever the circumstances, as a form of apostasy, punishable by death.  
    But such views have lately been challenged. Last year Ali Gomaa, the Grand Mufti, who is the government’s highest religious adviser, declared that nowhere in Islam’s sacred texts did it say that apostasy need be punished in the present rather than by God in the afterlife. In the past month, Egyptian courts have issued two rulings that, while restricted in scope, should ease some bothersome strictures.  
    Bahais may now leave the space for religion on their identity cards blank. Twelve former Christians won a lawsuit and may now return to their original faith, on condition that their identity documents note their previous adherence to Islam.  
    Small steps, perhaps, but they point the way towards freedom of choice and citizenship based on equal rights rather than membership of a privileged religion.
What progress has now been made toward religious freedom?
选项 A、They can revert to their original faith freely, as long as it is clearly stated on their ID cards that they used to be in Islam.
B、People may be freely reverted to their original faith, on condition that their children remain in Islam.
C、To those who converted to Islam, only their children can be reverted to their original faith.
D、The government has officially declared that such restriction on religious freedom would be abolished.
答案A
解析 本题主要在倒数第二段，是说有些基督徒赢得了官司，可以返回原来的信仰，只是要在身份证上注明自己曾经信仰过伊斯兰教。那么回过头来看选项，A项符合文意；B项说孩子仍需信仰伊斯兰教，这文中并未提及；C项说只有孩子能够返回原来的信仰，同样文中也没有提及；D项政府公开宣称不再限制宗教自由，这在文中也没有说明。故A项正确。   
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/cbp4777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)