首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2021-10-20
96
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness (无情) toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the US.
B、History of the US railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本文主要介绍的是美国法院在铁路公司伤害案中的裁决,因此D是最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/a8tK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Itisunfortunatethatthemembersofthecommitteedonot______inopinion.
______,thenewPresidentismorelikelytogiveeconomicandtradeissuespriorityoverforeignpolicy.
A.designsB.energyC.contextsD.generallyE.walkingF.timeG.exposingH.accessI.returnedJ.appealK.unethica
A.dietB.regularlyC.healthyD.commonlyE.reducedF.samplesG.containsH.participatedI.drinkJ.measuredK.av
A.arbitraryB.avoidedC.complicatesD.createdE.distinctionsF.eachG.featuresH.individualI.rar
Humanbodyneedsavarietyofessentialnutrientstofunctionproperly.Unlessyouarea【C1】______,youprobablydon’tknowwhat
Nowadays,WeChat’sfunctionsofShake-ShakeandDriftBottleallowuserstorandomlyconnecttootheruserscloseby.However,i
RiteofPassageisagoodnovelbyanystandards;______,itshouldrankhighonanylistofsciencefiction.
PASSAGEONEWhydidthegirlplaybasketballoverandoveragain?WhatbroughtPhilipareleasefromhispain?
PASSAGETWOWhatisthemeaningofthesentence"...thereisnoroadintheEnglish-speakingworldmoresteepedinstories"in
随机试题
下列属于哪个国家代表性的乐器组合?()
能使肾上腺素升压作用翻转的药物是
对肝性脑病患者一般禁止应用安眠药和镇静药物,其原因是()
资源禾悯率低,与我国()多年来没有根本性改变密切相关。
波分复用设备合波器(OMU)的主要测试项目有()。
有效组合与无差异曲线的切点所表示的组合,是投资者的最满意的有效组合。()
猕猴桃:火龙果
1985年,邓小平指出,“过去我们的观点一直是战争不可避免,而且迫在眉睫”“这几年我们仔细地观察了形势”“由此得出结论,在较长时间内不发生大规模的世界战争是有可能的”。这一判断()。
下列历史事件按时间先后排序正确的是()。
材料1:一日,王教授应邀到甲机关举办一场关于职业道德与行为规范关系的专题讲座。会场里时常响起手机声,会议主持人不断地用手势提醒大家关闭手机,甚至打断学者讲座,让大家保持会场秩序。次日王教授到乙机关举办同样的讲座,会场秩序井然,听讲座的每个人都自觉地关闭手机
最新回复
(
0
)