首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
There is one last question I must deal with in this chapter. Why should human beings be moral? Another way of putting the proble
There is one last question I must deal with in this chapter. Why should human beings be moral? Another way of putting the proble
admin
2013-03-27
88
问题
There is one last question I must deal with in this chapter. Why should human beings be moral? Another way of putting the problem is as follows; Is there any clear foundation or basis for morality? Can any reasons be found for human beings to be good and do right acts rather than be bad and do wrong acts?
I have already pointed out the difficulties involved in founding morality on religion, and especially on religion as a safe factor.(1)
However, if a person has religious faith, then he or she does have a foundation for a personal morality, even though this foundation is basically psychological rather than logical in nature. What disturbs me about the use of religion as the foundation of morality is the frequently-made assumption that if there is no supernatural or religious basis for morality, then there can be no basis at all.
A related, and perhaps deeper, statement is that there can be no real meaning to human life: unless there is some sort of afterlife or some other extra-natural reason for living.(2)
It is obvious that for many individuals this is psychologically true; that is, they feel that their existence has meaning and purpose and that they have a reason for being moral if and only if there is a God, an afterlife, or some sort of religion in their lives.
I feel that we must respect this point of view and accept the conviction of the many people who hold it, because that is how they feel about life and morality.
It is also obvious, however, that many people do not feel this way.(3)
I think it is terribly presumptuous of religious believers to feel that if some people do not have a religious commitment, their lives are meaningless, or that such people have no reason for being moral in their actions.
But if religion does not necessarily provide a "why" for morality, then what does? Let us assume for a moment that there is no supernatural morality and see if we can find any other reasons why people should be moral.
Enlightened Self-interest
One can certainly argue on a basis of enlightened self-interest, that it is, at the very least, generally better to be good rather than bad and to create a world and society that is good rather than one that is bad. As a matter of fact, self-interest is the sole basis of one ethical theory, ethical egoism. I am not, however, suggesting at this point that one ought to pursue one’s own self-interest. I am merely presenting the argument that if everyone tried to do and be good and to avoid and prevent bad, it would be in everyone’s self-interest. For example, if within a group of people no one killed, stole, lied, or cheated, then each member of the group would benefit.(4)
An individual member of the group could say, "It’s in my self-interest to do good rather than bad because I stand to benefit if I do and also because I could be ostracized or punished if I don’t. " Therefore, even though it is not airtight, the argument from enlightened self-interest is a somewhat compelling one.
Argument from Tradition and Law
Related to the foregoing argument is the argument from tradition and law. This argument suggests that because traditions and laws, established over a long period of time, govern the behavior of human beings and because these traditions and laws urge human beings to be moral rather than immoral, there are good reasons for being so.(5)
Self-interest is one reason, but another is respect for the human thought and effort that has gone into establishing such laws and traditions and transferring them from one historic period and one culture to another. This can be an attractive argument, even though it tends to suppress questioning of traditions and laws—a kind of questioning that is, I feel, the very touchstone of creative moral reasoning.
It is interesting to note that most of us probably learned morality through being confronted with this argument, the religious argument, and the experiences surrounding them. Don’t we all remember being told we should or should not do something because it was or was not in our own self-interest, because God said it was right or wrong, or because it was the way we were supposed to act in our family, school, society, and world?
(2)
选项
答案
很明显,对于很多人而言,这种说法从心理方面来看是正确的。也就是说,如果或者说只有在他们的生活中有上帝、来世或某种宗教的存在,他们才会觉得自己的存在具有意义和目的,也因此他们才有恪守道德的理由。
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/VjmO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Anorator,whosepurposeistopersuademen,mustspeakthethingstheywishtohear,anorator,whosepurposeistomovemen,m
AidsinSouthAfricaisthreateningtobecomeaproblem.Attheendof1993,4.25%ofSouthAfricanadultswereHIVpositive.By
Thesedayswehearalotofnonsenseaboutthe"greatclasslesssociety".Theideathatthetwentiethcenturyistheageofthe
Therearetwobasicwaystoseegrowth:oneasaproduct,theotherasaprocess.Peoplehavegenerallyviewedpersonalgrowtha
ProfessorWalterOechsleroftheUniversityofMannheim(Germany)believestheworkplaceandworkforceinthe21stcenturywill
Thesourcesofanti-Christianfeelingweremanyandcomplex.Onthemoreintangibleside,therewasageneralpiqueagainstthe
Culturalknowledgeconsistsoftherules,categories,assumptions,definitions,andjudgmentsthatpeopleusetoclassifyandin
Overthepastfewyears,outcriesfromfoodactivistshavechangedmanyAmericans’eatinghabits:Criticismofwidespreadpestici
Moderncomplexsocietiesaretroubledbyalackofconsensusaroundmanyissuesofrightandwrongorproperandimproperbehavi
随着中世纪结构的崩溃和现代生产方式的兴起,劳动的意义和作用发生了根本性的变化,这在新教国家表现得尤为突出。因为人对刚刚获得的自由感到不知所措,心里老是想着如何以一种狂热的活动来消除自己的疑虑和恐惧。这种活动无论成功或是失败都将决定他的灵魂能否获救,表明他是
随机试题
可用于治疗高胆红素血症和新生儿核黄疸的药物是
A、.肝胃湿热,火毒外侵B、.肝气郁结,冲任失调C、.肾气坏足,肝失所养D、.肝郁化火,肺阴不足E、.肝火胃热,乳儿吮吸,外吹结毒乳痨的病机是
A、腺鳞头部由8个细胞组成,柄为单细胞B、皮层中有间隙腺毛C、非腺毛多列性,壁木化增厚D、壁内腺E、非腺毛圆锥形,表面具角质线纹补骨脂的性状是()
以下对金融机构工作人员购买假币、以假币换取货币罪的说法中,正确的有()。
设计制作幻灯片母版的菜单是()。
生产力和生产关系、经济基础和上层建筑之间的矛盾已经不再是社会主义社会的基本矛盾。()
如图6—32所示,一个底面半径为R的圆柱形量杯中装有适量的水.若放入一个半径为r的实心铁球,水面高度恰好升高r,则为().
生产线生产的产品成箱包装,每箱的质量是随机的,假设每箱平均重50kg,标准差为5kg.若用最大载重量为5t的汽车承运,试利用中心极限定理说明每辆车最多可以装多少箱,才能保障不超载的概率大于0.977(Ф(2)=0.977,其中Ф(x)是标准正态分布函
他告诉大家把不敢这件:事
Japan’soldimperialarmyneverwentintothefieldwithoutagroupof"comfortwomen"forthetroops.Manymaleofficeworkers
最新回复
(
0
)