首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nice people do racism too. Liberal commitment to a multi-ethnic Britain is wilting. Some very nice folk have apparently decided
Nice people do racism too. Liberal commitment to a multi-ethnic Britain is wilting. Some very nice folk have apparently decided
admin
2013-01-24
63
问题
Nice people do racism too. Liberal commitment to a multi-ethnic Britain is wilting. Some very nice folk have apparently decided that the nation’s real problem is too many immigrants of too many kinds. Faced with a daily onslaught against migrants it may be understandable to give in to populist bigotry; but it is not forgivable.
Take this, for example: "National citizenship is inherently exclusionary." So no foreigners need ever apply for naturalisation, then. And" ... public anxiety about migration ... is usually based on a rational understanding of the value of British citizenship and its~ incompatibility with over-porous borders". Straight from the lexicon of the far right. And best of all: "You can have a welfare state provided that you are a homogenous society with intensely shared values."
These are extracts from an article in the Observer, penned by the liberal intellectual Goodhart, who is just one of several liberal thinkers now vigorously making what they consider a progressive argument against immigration. It goes like this: the more diverse a society, the less likely its citizens are to share common values; the fewer common values, the weaker the support for vital institutions of social solidarity, such as the welfare state and the National Health Service.
There are perfectly good reasons to worry about how we respond to immigration, not least the downward pressure on workers’ wages; the growth of racial inequality; and the exploitation of illegals. But the answer to these problems is not genteel xenophobia, but trade union rights, backed by equality and employment law.
The xenophobes should come clean. Their argument is not about immigration at all. They are liberal Powellites; what really bothers them is race and culture. If today’s immigrants were white people from the old Commonwealth, Goodhart and his friends would say that they pose no threat because they share Anglo-Saxon values.
Unfortunately for liberal Powellites, the real history of the NHS shatters their fundamental case against diversity. The NHS is a world-beating example of the way that ethnic diversity can create social solidarity. Launched by a Welshman, built by Irish: labourers, founded on the skills of Caribbean nurses and Indian doctors, it is now being rescued by an emergency injection of Filipino nurses, refugee ancillaries and antipodean medics. And it remains 100% British.
Virtually all of our public services have depended heavily on immigrants. Powell was forced to admit as much when, as minister for health he advertised for staff in the Caribbean. His new admirers will discover that a rapidly depopulating Europe will have no choice but to embrace diversity.
For the moment, however, the liberal Powellites are gaining support in high places. Their ideas are inspired by the work of the American sociologist Putnam, a Downing Street favourite. He purports to show that dynamic, diverse communities are more fragmented than stable, monoethnic ones. But the policy wonks have forgotten that Putnam’s research was conducted in a society so marked by segregation that even black millionaires still live in gated ghettoes.
The prime minister still seems uneasy on the issue. Last week, he wavered uncertainly between backing his pro-immigration home secretary, and a defensive response to Howard’s goading that the government was in a mess on the topic.
Oddly enough, this is a place in the arena of world politics where the PM does not stand shoulder to shoulder with Bush. The Spanish-speaking former governor of Texas recently announced that he would "regularise" the status of millions of illegal Mexican immigrants who had slipped across the border to work. It’s the kind of massive amnesty that would send the Daily Express into conniptions.
Even more peculiar, the prime minister appears to be ignoring not only Blunkett but also his new best friend, the Labour mayor of London, Livingstone, and Scotland’s first minister, McConnell. London wants more immigrants to keep pace with its booming economy, Scotland wants them to boost its ageing work force..Yet the liberal Powellites still seem prepared to confront a Bush-Blunkett-Livingstone-McConnell axis, because they are scared witless by the far right. They hope that by appeasing racism, they’ll make it go away. But this is a beast with an insatiable appetite.
The French discovered that too late; the thuggish National Front is now France’s second largest party, with one in five likely to vote for them in upcoming local elections. Liberal secularists who joined in the assault on the rights of French Muslims now have to find a convincing explanation for their cowardice, which has also betrayed the freedom of expression of French Jews and Christians.
In Holland, this spinelessness has ended up as straight leftwing racism. The previously liberal Dutch establishment is now pushing an asylum policy so extreme even the Sun was moved to criticise it.
The line up that favours managed migration and diversity--Blunkett, McConnell, Livingstone, Bush and the Sun--share one quality that the PM should envy m6re than any other at present: they are all popular with the public. Maybe the government ought to pay, more heed to this focus group than the ones that see scary foreigners on every street corner.
Perhaps we should also be creating an even more progressive immigration policy, for example offering easier admission to those who will bring their skills to the depopulated regions of the north. The Americans will next year offer more work permits to IT whizzkids from India than ever before; and before the middle of the century, the world’s strongest economy will become its most ethnically diverse. Our own population is still over 92% white; we shouldn’t be duped by anxious faint-hearts into becoming an all-white backwater.
According to the passage, which of the following statements is NOT true?
选项
A、Those who dislike immigrants should admit their mistakes.
B、The UK and the US do not agree on the immigration issue.
C、The Daily Express supports Texas’s regularizing illegal immigrants.
D、Racism will not automatically come to an end if people give in to it.
答案
C
解析
第十段最后一句话应能说明选项C为正确答案:It’s the kind of massive amnesty that would send the Daily Express into conniptions(愤怒).显然,the Daily Express是不赞成Texas的做法的。其他选项所指均为作者意见(A,见第五段第一句;B,见第十段第一句;D,见第十一段末尾两句)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/QraO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A"scientistic"viewoflanguagewasdominantamongphilosophersandlinguistswhoaffectedtodevelopascientificanalysisof
______isthestudyofspeechsoundsinlanguageoralanguagewithreferencetotheirdistributionandpatterningandtotacitr
MannersnowadaysinmetropolitancitieslikeLondonarepracticallynon-existent.Itisnothingforabig,strongschoolboytoe
A、Thechild’sacademicperformance.B、Thechild’scharacterandpersonality.C、Thechild’scomputerskills.D、Thechild’swillin
BodySystemsAbodysystemreferstoagroupoforgans,whicharepartsofthebodythatdoaspecialjob,suchastheheart,
Whyshouldanyonebuythelatestvolumeintheever-expandingDictionaryofNationalBiography?Idonotmeanthatitisbad,as
ThecapitalofNorthernIrelandis______.
HowdidtheinterviewerdescribeDeputySheriffJenniferFulford-Salvano?
生命没有寄托的人,青年时代和“儿时”对他格外宝贵。这种浪漫蒂克的回忆其实并不是发现了“儿时”的真正了不得,而是感觉到中年以后的衰退。本来,生命只有一次,对于谁都是宝贵的。但是,假使他的生命溶化在大众的里面,假使他天天在为这世界干些什么,那末,他总在生长,虽
随机试题
关于数制及其转换,下列说法不正确的有________。
患者女性,65岁。因自觉食欲明显增加半年前来就诊。自觉“长胖很多”。经有关检查示:C-肽释放试验结果为空腹580pmol/L,1小时1120pmol/L,2小时1650pmol/L,3小时866pmol/L;糖化血红蛋白11%;24小时尿C-肽为18.4μ
融券卖出的申报价格不得低于该证券的()。
甲公司是一家上市公司,注册资本1亿元。甲公司最近3个会计年度连续盈利,最近3年公司实现的年均可分配利润达到3000万元,自2008年以来没有以任何形式向股东分配利润。2011年2月1日,在公司股东大会上,董事会提交了如下议案:(1)增选公司董事的方案:鉴
根据民法通则及相关规定,下列关于诉讼时效的哪种说法是正确的?
教育不能脱离社会物质条件而凭空产生,与以往教育有着渊源关系,说明教育具有()。
简述如何进行后进生教育。
“学而时习之,温故而知新”反映了()教学原则。
李家为儿子李丁过生日,却为确定出生日期犯愁。李丁的母亲记得儿子是6月28日傍晚出生,医院的接生记录簿上记载的是6月29H,出生证上记载的是6月30日,而户口薄上记载的是7月1日。从法律意义上讲,李丁的出生时间应以哪一日期为准?()
在一次围棋比赛中,参赛选手陈华不时地挤捏指关节,发出的声响干扰了对手的思考。在比赛封盘间歇时,裁判警告陈华:如果再次在比赛中挤捏指关节并发出声响,将判其违规。对此,陈华反驳说,他挤捏指关节是习惯性动作,并不是故意的,因此,不应被判违规。
最新回复
(
0
)