首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very near Liverpool Street Station when the first expl
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very near Liverpool Street Station when the first expl
admin
2013-08-05
91
问题
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very near Liverpool Street Station when the first explosion was detonated. Hearing the sirens and seeing London’s emergency personnel respond to the bombings brought back vivid memories of the events of Sept. 11, 2001.
People have not forgotten Sept. 11, 2001. Americans can still recall exactly where they were and what they were doing on that fateful day. But it’s understandable that some remember it as historical fact, lacking the painful impact and immediacy they originally felt. If we allow a dimming of purpose—to eliminate terrorism—these terrorist attacks in London serve as another chilling reminder that we’re still at war.
Something constructive emerges from these tragic, horrible and unexplainable attacks. It is the message that we must remain vigilant in opposing an enemy who intentionally targets innocent civilians.
Since Sept. 11, 2001, the civilized nations of the world have remained mostly united in opposing these despicable, wanton acts of terror. We have had some great successes in that effort. We have arrested perpetrators and plotters, and we have foiled planned attacks. We have reduced the power and scope of those who despise freedom and democracy.
The effort must continue. As we learned Thursday—and in Madrid and Bali—the enemies of freedom have not lost their resolve. We must not lose ours.
Ultimately, the only real defense from terrorist attacks is being able to find out about them in advance. Intelligence gathering has improved but needs to be even stronger, including consistently improving human intelligence and patrol. Police and ordinary citizens must be alert and encouraged to convey information.
Once a terrorist incident does occur, there’s no such thing as a perfect response. By definition, a terrorist attack means people are being hurt or killed. But by studying the response to past attacks, we can better prepare to handle those in the future.
London is one of the most secure cities in the world, steeped in years of dealing with terrorism. The city’s preparation and resolve was evident on Thursday. I am very impressed by London’s reaction to the bombings. Both the emergency personnel and the citizens seemed prepared. The first responders were rapid, well-directed, organized and professional, in accordance with obviously well-tested plans.
As for the citizens, at least a dozen people told me in one way or another, "We knew this was going to happen; it was just a question of when."
That is not only a realistic assessment; it also is a mindset that just might save lives. Political, business and community leaders are sometimes reluctant to talk about terrorism or stage drills to prepare their response because they don’t want to frighten or upset people. But that’s a mistake. People react to emergencies more effectively when they’re not shocked by them.
Tony Blair and London Mayor Ken Livingstone have made preparedness a priority, and their efforts clearly paid off during Thursday’s response to the attacks.
There’s another benefit to preparing for terrorism in advance. Part of the damage the terrorists hope to inflict is the emotional reaction in the wake of the destruction. The reason it’s called "terrorism" is that they want fear and its debilitating effects to linger long after the smoke has cleared.
By preparing citizens for the possibility of a terrorist attack, leaders can help minimize the emotional response in the wake of the destruction.
Finally, Thursday’s attacks demonstrate that we must remain committed to confronting and eliminating terrorism. There are those who assert that the efforts to eliminate terror are somehow provoking the terrorists. That is wrong. The terrorists have been attacking innocent people long before Sept. 11, 2001, or the wars in Afghanistan or Iraq.
Seeing Prime Minister Blair speak so forcefully, with President Bush, President Jacques Chirac and other world leaders right behind him, was encouraging. Let’s remember the unity the world shared after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
Free nations can and will disagree. But let us always remember that free people must be steadfast and resilient in defending our way of life.
A suitable title for the passage would be
选项
A、July 7th Terrorist Attack in London.
B、The war against terrorism.
C、Terrorism after Sept. 11, 2001.
D、Lessons from terrorist attack in London.
答案
D
解析
本文作者从伦敦恐怖袭击开始写起,接着回顾“9.11”恐怖事件,提醒人们恐怖主义分子依然猖狂,随后用大量篇幅阐述伦敦应对此次事件给我们的经验和教训,最后作者呼吁全世界的自由民族联合起来抵抗恐怖主义。全文主体是对伦敦7月7日恐怖袭击的反思和经验总结,因此选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/P44O777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Ihavenostatisticsonthis,butconversationwithfriendsanddozensofperson-on-the-streetinterviewsIsawandheardlastmo
Criticismofresearchlaysasignificantfoundationforfutureinvestigativework,butwhenstudentsbegintheirownprojects,t
IwasborninFeb.12,1809,inHardinCounty,Kentucky.MyparentswerebothborninVirginia,ofundistinguishedfamilies--secon
TheU.S.SpaceAgencyNASAsays______orbitingMirspacestationhaslostitsprimaryandbackupoxygensources.
AllofthefollowingstatementsabouterroranalysisaretrueEXCEPTthat______.
WhichofthefollowingdoesnotbelongtotheIslandofGreatBritain?
WhichofthefollowingisCORRECT?
Ste.GenevieveisknownforthefollowingEXCEPT
Arapidmeansoflong-distancetransportationbecameanecessityfortheUnitedStatesassettlementspreadfartherwestward
芙蓉镇街面不大。十几家铺子、几十户住家紧紧夹着一条青石板街。铺子和铺子是那样的紧密,以至一家煮狗肉,满街闻香气;以至谁家娃儿跌跤碰脱牙,扛了碗,街坊邻里心中都有数;以至姐妹家的私房活,年轻夫妻的打情骂俏,都常常被隔壁邻居听了去,传为一镇的的秘闻趣事,笑料谈
随机试题
对神经元描述有误的是()。
阅读作品片段,请回答下面问题:十九年,似乎一切全变了,又似乎都没有改变。死了许多人,毁了许多家。许多可爱的生命葬入黄土。接着又有许多新的人继续扮演不必要的悲剧。浪费,浪费,还是那许多不必要的浪费——生命,精力,感情,财富,甚至欢笑和眼泪。我去的时
上肢骨提携角的角度是
顺丰物流公司利用10英尺的运输车向北京发送货物,该运输车的限重为8.5吨,有效容量为15立方米,重体商品比重为0.7吨/立方米,轻体商品比重为0.3吨/立方米。根据以上资料,回答下列问题:在确定配送路线时会有一些约束条件,具体有()。
会计部门的实物明细账与实物保管部门的明细账进行核对,属于账实核对。()
依据《中华人民共和国教育法》的规定,关于设立学校必须具备的基本条件的表述,下列选项不正确的是()
第一段“看得见的污染不一定是最要命的污染”一句强调的意思是()。文中[]应填入的词语是()。
试述我国当前外向型工业化战略遭遇的主要问题及我国当前外贸发展模式的主要问题。
马克思主义认识论与唯心主义认识论的区别在于是否承认
TheNatureandAimsofArchaeologyIntroductionA)Archaeologyispartlythediscoveryofthetreasuresofthepast,partlythem
最新回复
(
0
)