首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Beijing is contemplating charging congestion fees for cars that enter the city center during peak hours in a bid to ease the tra
Beijing is contemplating charging congestion fees for cars that enter the city center during peak hours in a bid to ease the tra
admin
2020-01-15
127
问题
Beijing is contemplating charging congestion fees for cars that enter the city center during peak hours in a bid to ease the traffic condition and improve the air quality in the capital. Heated discussions on the effectiveness of congestion fees are aroused among people. The following are opinions from different sides. Read the excerpts carefully and write your response in about 300 words, in which you should:
1. summarize briefly the different opinions:
2. give your comment.
Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
BadBreath(the US): Drastic measures must be taken or imposed in order to deal with the horrendous pollution problems throughout China. They can place enormous tariffs on cars to minimize traffic volume and pollution. Then, continue expanding the subway to the best of their ability.
Brendan(the UK): The congestion charge was introduced in London in 2003 in a bid to reduce inner-city traffic volume and prevent pollution. The congestion charge of about £11.5 is required to enter the zone. In the 12 years since the congestion fees have been levied, traffic volume and pollution have fallen sharply. The policy can be named as one of the most successful policies.
Matt(China): I support the move! I have to endure road congestion every day to and from work: I don’t know whether this congestion charge will be an effective solution to this problem or not, but I sure hope so! The ways of managing cars that are currently in force are unreasonable since they cost a lot in fees even for people who don’t drive cars. It would be better to change to a situation where those who drive cars bear high costs, while those who do not drive cars pay no money at all.
Britomart(China). There’s another very significant factor, which our city’s officials seem to be ignoring. Congestion fees are no barrier to the very wealthy, to whom fees and regulations are negligible. If anything, higher rates simply serve to show off that they are the elite, to whom money is irrelevant.
Strangerl23(the US): Such fees are just more income for the government. People who need to drive will pay the fee. No such fee can ever stop or deter anyone from driving. You know why? Driving is not a luxury as you imagine. To many people, driving is a necessity. Why don’t you ban cars? This would work greatly.
Arun(Singapore): The congestion charge is almost proven not to work all by itself. It has to come backed up with extensive public transport systems. Singapore has a decent public transport system and that is why the congestion charge works. Singapore has a metro stop almost every two blocks(in the central districts) and buses every 5 minutes to feed them. The inherent solution itself comes with the way the city is designed so that people travel less. China could solve part of the problems with ramping up the density of residential areas around their work places.
PatrickInBeijing(Germany): Congestion fees might make more sense if they are coupled with other programs. Several people have noted to improve mass transit. How about lower fees for cars with multiple passengers and higher fees for cars with only one person? Multiple passenger cars could also be given priority at toll booths. Electric cars could get reduced fees, while large cars that produce more pollution would pay more. There are a number of ideas which could help. Keep in mind that it is not just about congestion, but about pollution and that not all cars pollute equally.
Write your response on ANSWER SHEET FOUR.
选项
答案
Should Congestion Fees for Cars Be Charged? In the wake of a spell of hazardous smog, Beijing’s traffic authority announced that the city is likely to charge congestion fees for car owners. Should congestion fees be the problem-solver? People’s opinions vary a lot. Although they all unanimously agree that drastic measures should be taken, to solve the horrendous traffic and pollution problems is much more difficult than to propose a policy. Some support the government in view of London’s successful experience in 2003, and they claim the fees collected could be used to expand public transportation. But others point out that congestion fees will not deter people from driving, as driving is not a luxury but a necessity. On the contrary, it makes those who drive feel the sense of superiority. Besides, congestion fees make no sense without the support of some other programs, such as the extension of public transport system, the balance on different types of car driving, and so on. Sorting out all the fluffy clues, my main contention is that the congestion charge does not guarantee a solution to traffic and pollution problems without the support of other programs. First, public transport system should be well-extended and well-developed. The key to solving the congestion problem in metropolises in China is to balance the fast growing demand on transportation and the insufficient supply of transportation resources. Second, there should be different considerations about the charge. For example, cars with multiple passengers or energy-saving cars should get reduced fees, and electric cars should be charged free. Third, vehicle emission may not be the main source of the notorious smog problem in China. London smog is not controlled by only one policy of collecting congestion fees. The government must make sure that the fees are spent on the improvement of dwelling environment of its people. Otherwise, it will surely arouse complaints and discontent from its citizens. In a word, we should not combine air pollution with congestion problems in big cities. Comprehensive considerations and joint efforts by the government, and researchers from institutions and the public are all needed.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/O8bK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Fundingpublictransitisoneofthebiggestproblemsfacingcitiestoday.Oftenthetroubleisthatafewhigh-cost,low-rider
HowtoMakeItinCollegeI.Getgoodgradesthesecrete:figureouta【T1】______【T1】______—fivestudytipsa.setupastudyp
AudienceAwarenessofWritingI.Introduction—contents,【T1】______andstylesdependontheaudience【T1】______—theimportance
A、Anewbrandofsunscreen.B、Awebsiteandsmartphoneapp.C、Anewsmartphone.D、Anelectronicdevice.B女士在访谈开头从人们对商品安全的担忧引出了男士
(1)Whichwouldyouprefertobe:amedievalmonarchoramodernoffice-worker?Thekinghasarmiesofservants.Hewearsthefin
A、Itissatisfying.B、Itisnotessential.C、Itistoomuch.D、Itisbarelyenough.D本题考查重要细节。根据句(7-1)、句(7-2)和句(7-3)可知,人们每天要摄取75
HowtoBeanExpertI.BackgroundinformationaboutthespeakerA.BeinganexpertinanthropologyhimselfB.Startingconsider
不管是好习惯还是坏习惯,都是逐渐养成的。当一个人重复做某件事时,一种看不见的力量驱使他去重复做同一件事,这样就养成了习惯。习惯一旦形成,要改掉它是困难的,有时是不可能的。所以,我们在形成习惯的时候要小心谨慎,这一点是非常重要的。小孩子常常会养成坏习惯。这些
我曾经因为有几个大学生登山迷途丧生,而访问某位登山专家,其中一个问题是:“如果我们在半山腰,突然遇到大雨,应该怎么办?”登山专家说:“你应该向山顶走。”“为什么不往山下跑?山上风雨不是更大吗?”我怀疑地问。“往山顶走,固然风雨可能更大,却不足以威胁你的生命
老家的大胡同属南北走向,地势北高南低,建筑设计独具匠心,从村南大街进入胡同头往里一看,有一个高大的门洞,雄伟壮阔,设计精美,古香古色,就像一个十分壮观的牌坊,门洞的两扇大门很大,木料很厚,很结实。沿着门洞再往里看,以为就是那么几栋房屋,也看到头了,可再往深
随机试题
若有一判断为“所有的科学家都是天才”,试分析下列问题:反驳该判断的相应的特称判断是什么?为什么?
Thegardener______theboynottosteponthegrass.
某洁净室室内外压差为10Pa,采用密闭门,缝隙长度为20m,单层固定密闭钢窗,缝隙总长度为80m,则压差风量为()。
煤矿井下各级配电网络电压和各种电气设备的额定电压等级,应符合高压不超过()V;低压不超过()V。
交易所会员直接从事大宗上市股票交易而形成的市场,称为()。
Thenewspapermustprovideforthereaderthefacts,unalloyed,unslanted,objectivelyselectedfacts.Butinthesedaysofcomp
对下列农业知识的掌握有误的一项是()。
房奴
DoestheInternetMakeYouDumber?[A]TheRomanphilosopherSenecamayhaveputitbest2,000yearsago:"Tobeeverywhereisto
AsaprofessoratalargeAmericanuniversity,Ioftenhearstudentssaying:"I’monlya1050."Theunluckystudentsarespeaki
最新回复
(
0
)