首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
admin
2017-03-15
58
问题
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the posher parts of Brighton and Hove, a seaside town with an eclectic social mix, are on the warpath about a change to the way school places are awarded. Threatening e-mails, allegations of gerrymandering and warnings that parents would sue were only part of the reaction to this week’s news that, from 2008, the local authority will allocate places in popular schools by lottery.
Until now, if more children applied to a school than it had room for, those who lived nearest usually won out. As a result, houses next to the most sought-after schools soared in value—entrenching the schools as middle-class ghettoes and increasing their desirability still further. Those who could not afford to live within spitting distance had to go elsewhere. Families living in east Brighton, with no schools nearby, were left to squabble over the crumbs.
Eight secondary schools have been divided into six "catchment areas", two of which have pairs of adjacent schools. If a school cannot accommodate all the children who apply, the council will allocate places randomly, giving preference to those within the catchment area. Some children who would previously have walked to the school around the corner will be bused or driven past children going the opposite way.
The scheme has been two years in the hatching. It was nearly derailed by the bitter opposition of parents who had paid top prices for houses next to the schools they liked. They now face not only the possible frustration of their educational hopes for their children but also the prospect that their investment will slump in value.
In the end these parents were defeated by the nifty footwork of Labour councillors determined to push the plan through. The vice-chairman of the committee that voted on the scheme was sacked by the city’s Labour leader just two hours before the vote on February 27th—after she made it clear that she would be voting against. It went through only on the chairman’s casting vote.
Similar battles may soon be fought all over Britain. On February 28th a new admissions code for schools in England and Wales came into force, setting out how a school may decide among the competing claims of children who apply. Religion, proximity and having siblings at the school are all still acceptable, but very popular schools are "encouraged" to use lotteries, as some academies in Britain and charter schools in America now do. They are also urged to consider "fair banding"—working out what mix of abilities their area provides, getting children to take an entrance exam, and then admitting representative numbers from each level of ability.
The admissions code was a sop to left-wingers who hate the government’s broader reforms to free schools from the control of councils, fearing that more segregation will result. Both the code and the Brighton row confirm a depressing aspect of the debate over school choice and standards: an obsession with sharing out places at the best schools rather than creating more of them.
Prospective winners in Brighton are as elated as the losers are despondent. They now have a chance to send their children to schools that they could not previously aspire to. That puts those schools on their mettle: they must prove that it was their teaching and facilities that won good grades, not their middle-class pupils. If they fail, expect to see more children in Brighton going private.
What is "fair-banding"?
选项
答案
Working out what mix of abilities their area provides, getting children to take an entrance exam, and then admitting representative numbers from each level of ability.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/IySO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
U.S.jobgrowthwassurprisinglystrongin2018,butdon’texpectthattohappenagainthisyear,witheconomicheadwindsintens
Scienceandtechnologyisamongthefactorsthathavetakenthehumancivilizationtothelevelitenjoystoday.Everymilestone
MymotherandOlgahadmetwhileunderwentfertilitytreatmentsatsomesortofexperimentalprograminoneoftheMoscowclinic
到1999年春季,美国环境保护署和中国国家环境保护总局(SEPA)的官员签订了一个协议备忘录,建立了两国在排污权交易和酸雨控制方面的双边示范项目。在签字仪式上召开的国际研讨会上,与会者通过介绍了解了美国环境保护协会与中国地方城市之间的合作项目,这也是到目前
本次会议是信息社会世界峰会的首次政府间筹备会议,既要处理程序性问题,又要处理实质性问题。开好筹备会,是峰会取得成功的重要保证。中国代表团愿就峰会筹备工作谈以下几点看法://一、要高度重视知识和人才问题。在未来信息社会中,知识和技能是促进经济发展的
女士们,先生们:早上好!很荣幸参加此次论坛,与各位共同探讨环保与发展方面的问题。气候变化是环境问题,但归根到底是发展问题。这个问题是在发展进程中出现的,应该在可持续发展框架下解决。只有各方在促进自身发展过程中不断提高技术水平,积极建立适应可持续
与政府存在合约关系的美国公司经常面临这样的选择,究竟购买价格昂贵的本土产品,还是价格低廉的外来产品。如果公司选择购买本土产品,可能会因为未能把价格压低而激怒纳税人。但如果购买外来产品,则可能让美国工人面临失业危机。最近,美国国会通过法律,勒令与政府签过合同
今晚我要祝福你的俱乐部生日快乐。现在,我自己已经到达生命中的一个阶段,在这个阶段里我记住的是我的生日而不是我几岁了。我想我已经到了所谓的中年。这个阶段,我们往往摄人对我们有益的食物,而不是我们喜欢的食物。我为你们的俱乐部感到自豪,因为它是为我们上了年纪的人
随机试题
背景某工程概算已被批准,准许招标。工程采用公开招标招标,招标文件规定:以概算额为基础按固定总价合同承包。某场道施工公司一举中标后通过艰苦谈判确定合同价650万元。该施工公司认为工程结构简单且对施工现场很熟悉未进行勘察,另外因工期短于一年市场价格不会有太大
简述ISAPI的过滤机制。
小儿原发性肺结核的主要播散方式是()
治疗小儿化脓性脑膜炎,病原菌明确后,使用敏感性抗生素的时间至少是
图示柱截面最外层钢筋的混凝土保护层厚度c,标注正确的是()。
在电气设备绝缘保护中,符号“回”是()的辅助标志。
凡是具备相对独立完成会计数据输入、处理和输出功能的模块的软件,如()等,均可视为会计核算软件。
很多人认为实行绩效工资主要目的是为了提工资,说说你的看法。
下列函数的功能是voidfun(char*a,char*b){while((*b=*a)!=’\0’){a++;b++;}}
NarratorListentoaconversationbetweenaforeignstudentandaprofessor.Nowgetreadytoanswerthequestions.Yo
最新回复
(
0
)