首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Unlike any other scientific topics, consciousness—the first-person awareness of the world around—is truly in the eye of beholder
Unlike any other scientific topics, consciousness—the first-person awareness of the world around—is truly in the eye of beholder
admin
2010-05-25
59
问题
Unlike any other scientific topics, consciousness—the first-person awareness of the world around—is truly in the eye of beholder. I know I am conscious. But how do I know that you are?
Through logical analogy—I am a conscious human being, and therefore you as a human being are also likely to be conscious—I conclude I am probably not the only conscious being in a world of biological puppets. Extend it to other creatures, and uncertainty grows. Is a dog conscious? An elm? A rock?
"We don’t have the mythical consciousness meter," said Dr. Chalmers, a professor of philosophy and director of the Center for Consciousness Studies at the University of Arizona. "All we have directly to go on is behavior." So without even an elementary understanding of what consciousness is, the idea of instilling it into a machine—or understanding how a machine might evolve consciousness—becomes almost unfathomable.
The field of artificial intelligence started out with dreams of making thinking or conscious machines, but to debate, its achievements have been modest. The field has evolved to focus more on solving practical problems like complex scheduling tasks than on imitating human behavior.
But many believe that the original goals of artificial intelligence will be attainable within a few decades.
Some people, like Dr. Hans Moravec, a professor of robotics at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, believe a human being is nothing more than a fancy machine, and that it will be possible to build a machine with the same features, that there is nothing magical about the brain and biological flesh. "I’m confident we can build robot with behavior that is just as rich as human being behavior," he said. "You could quiz it as much as you like about its internal mental life, and it would answer as any human being." To Dr. Moravec, if it acts consciously, it is conscious. To ask more is pointless.
Dr. Chalmers, regards consciousness as an unutterable trait, and it may be useless to try to pin it down. "We’ve got to admit something here is irreducible," he said. "Some primitive precursor consciousness could go all the way down" to the smallest, most primitive organisms, he said. Dr. Chalmers too sees nothing fundamentally different between a creature of flesh and blood and one of metal, plastics and electronic circuits. "I’m quite open to the idea that machines might eventually become conscious," he said, adding that it would be "equally weird". And if a person gets into involved conversations with a robot about everything from Kant to baseball, "We’ll be as practically certain they are conscious as other people," he said. "Of course, that doesn’t resolve the theoretical question".
But others say machines, regardless of how complex, will never match people.
The arguments can become mysterious. In his book Shadows of the Mind, Dr. Roger Penrose, a mathematician at Oxford University, enlisted the incompleteness theorem in mathematics. He uses the theorem, which states that any system of theorems will invariably include statements that cannot be proven, to argue that any machine that uses computation—and hence all robots—will invariably fall short of the accomplishments of human mathematicians. Instead, he argues that consciousness is an effect of quantum mechanics in tiny structures in the brain that exceeds the abilities of any computer.
The case of Dr. Roger Penrose intends to ______.
选项
A、indicate that robot is much more intelligent than human beings
B、reveal the futility of human beings in the mathematics’ problem solving
C、show the weakness of the robot in some areas and it is not omniscient
D、tell us artificial intelligence is no more clever than human beings
答案
C
解析
事实细节题。根据文章末段第三句话,Dr. Roger Penrose认为机器也无法摆脱不完备性的缺陷,可以排除选项A ,而确定正确答案为C 。选项B 只是用来说明问题的论据;而选项 D 不是Dr. Roger Penrose的初衷,予以排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/GS2K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Whatisanextendedfamilyaccordingtothewoman?
Islanguage,likefood,abasichumanneedwithoutwhichachildatacriticalperiodoflifecanbestarvedanddamaged?Judgin
InAmerica,olderpeoplerarelylivewiththeiradultchildren.Butinmanyothercultureschildrenareexpectedtocare【C1】____
Ifwebelievesomethingisgoodandtrueweshould______toit.
The"fatherofwaters",theMississippiRiverisoneofthe【C1】______intheworld.AccordingtotheUnitedStatesArmyCorpsof
Marysatatthetable,lookedattheglareand______herlips.
Letusconsiderwhatscienceandtechnologyhavetocontributetothefoodproblem.Thesimplestwaytoincreasefoodprodu
Inmyopinion,theIndianConferencebearsinitsconsequencesnotonlyuponIndiabutuponthewholeworld.Indiaisbyitself
Welookedforatabletositdown,buttheywereall______.
WhenIlookeddownandsawhowfarIhadtojump,mycourage______me.
随机试题
1925年1月召开的中国共产党第四次全国代表大会的中心议题是________。
梁启超认为,汉代的经学、隋唐的佛学、宋明的理学、清代的考据学,都可看作()
正常情况下,下列哪种物质能被肾小管完全重吸收
王某1997年于中医药大学毕业分配到市级中医院工作,并于1998年取得了中医师执业资格,《中华人民共和国执业医师法》施行当年,其依照有关开办医疗机构的规定申请个体开业。依据我国执业医师法的规定,卫生行政部门应()
下列指标中,反映企业基本财务结构是否稳定,表明债权人投入的资本受到所有者权益保障程度的是()。
下列细胞器中,不属于细胞内膜系统的是()。
阅读下面材料,同答问题。李涛和王明记忆力相当,两人同时记忆1组英文单词,15分钟后两人均能达到连续两次准确无误背诵,为了提高记忆效果,李涛在20分钟后重复学了25分钟,王明在第5天学了25分钟.第6天测试中李涛的成绩明显高于王明。为什么学习时间
(x2+xy—x)dxdy=________,其中D由直线y=x,y=2x及x=1围成.
Theunemploymentratemayriseslightly.
Weallknowthatthenormalhumandailycycleofactivityisof.some7-8hours’sleepalternatingwithsome16-17hours’wakefu
最新回复
(
0
)