首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career diplomat struck an optimistic note. Yes, China would pro
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career diplomat struck an optimistic note. Yes, China would pro
admin
2022-08-22
42
问题
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career diplomat struck an optimistic note. Yes, China would probably soon overtake the United States as the world’s largest economy, he conceded, but the Middle Kingdom was unlikely to rival the United States anytime soon when it came to "soft power", or cultural influence and attractiveness.
Indeed, soft power is generally seen as a major asset in the foreign policy realm, helping countries achieve their goals without resorting to "hard power"—i.e.,
coercive
means. "Young people around the world," the diplomat confidently asserted, "still listen to American music, watch American movies and dream of coming to the United States."
Particularly in Latin America, that remains as true as ever, despite Donald Trump in the White House and a historic and irreversible shift of economic power away from the West towards Asia. The United States’ cultural influence and visibility stands unrivaled across Latin America. Chinese culture, by comparison, remains largely unknown and is usually met with indifference and a lack of interest. While some people are aware of China’s growing economic role in Latin America—it is already the largest trading partner of several of the region’s major economies, including Brazil, Chile and Peru—most would struggle to name a single Chinese contemporary singer, athlete or soap opera star. Latin America’s mass media busily reports even minor events in U.S. politics or cultural life, yet Chinese news remain the stuff of specialists.
Yet while U.S. soft power may provide some tangible economic benefits in Latin America—think of tourism to Disney World and New York, Netflix subscriptions and Starbucks sales—it has also shown to be a double-edged sword, particularly in the foreign policy realm. China’s
under-the-radar
approach in Latin America, by comparison, also brings important advantages, some of which may, paradoxically, be of greater strategic relevance in the long term. That is because, in a region traditionally concerned about U.S. meddling, strong cultural influence tends to inflate the perceived political and economic influence. While the United States’ de facto influence in Latin America has declined significantly over the past decade—partly due to China’s growing role in the region, but also because U.S. policymakers generally do not see the region as a priority—this change is barely reflected in the public debate, where the U.S. role remains outsized.
That often makes cooperating with the United States politically costly. When Brazil’s former President Fernando Henrique Cardoso reached, in 2000, a groundbreaking space cooperation deal with the United States, which would involve U.S. use of the Brazilian space agency’s launch site in Alcantara in Northern Brazil (its equatorial location allows reducing fuel costs of satellite launches by 30 percent), the opposition saw an opportunity to whip up anti-American nationalist sentiment by mischaracterizing the technology safeguards agreement (TSA) as a threat to Brazil’s sovereignty. Cardoso found himself accused of being an entreguista and canceled the project, which would have allowed Brazil to develop precious expertise in the area—increasingly important due to strong growth in the microsatellite sector crucial for GPS and internet communication. When the current government of Michel Temer took up the project recently, pressure again intensified, even though this time its successful conclusion is more likely. If the project partner had been China back then or today, it seems unlikely that the project would have faced as much political resistance.
This episode is starkly contrasted by how China can operate across Latin America and make strategic investments almost without any real concern for public opinion. When Chinese investors recently bought a third of Brazil’s electricity sector—a sector of tremendous strategic importance—the news barely made it to the front page of Brazilian newspapers.
Why was the U.S. career diplomat optimistic?
选项
A、Because China would probably soon overtake the United States as the world’s largest economy.
B、Because the United States would remain the world’s largest economy.
C、Because China was unlikely to rival the United States anytime soon when it came to "soft power".
D、Because the United States was unlikely to rival China anytime soon when it came to "soft power".
答案
C
解析
细节题。根据题干关键词定位第1段第1句,由第2句中的but分句可知,这位美国外交官认为中国在软实力方面还无法与美国匹敌。根据上下文,the Middle Kingdom应该指中国,故正确答案为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/CB0O777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Theworldhasexperienced【L1】______urbangrowthintherecentdecades.Asmuchas3%ofEarth’s【L2】______hasbeenurbanized,a
Theworldhasexperienced【L1】______urbangrowthintherecentdecades.Asmuchas3%ofEarth’s【L2】______hasbeenurbanized,a
Theworldhasexperienced【L1】______urbangrowthintherecentdecades.Asmuchas3%ofEarth’s【L2】______hasbeenurbanized,a
Theworldhasexperienced【L1】______urbangrowthintherecentdecades.Asmuchas3%ofEarth’s【L2】______hasbeenurbanized,a
Uganda’seagernessforgenuinedevelopmentisreflectedinitsschoolchildren’ssmilesandinthefactthatsomanychildrenare
It’snosurprisethatJenniferSenior’sinsightful,provocativemagazinecoverstory,"ILoveMyChildren,IHateMyLife,"isa
随机试题
男性,58岁,吸烟30年。咳嗽咳痰20余年,活动后气急4年,偶有下肢轻度水肿。查体:桶状胸,两肺呼吸音低,少量湿啰音,肺动脉瓣区第二心音亢进。最可能的诊断是
男性,64岁。30年前曾患右上肺结核,经INH、SM和PAS治疗约1年。5年前病灶复发,痰结核杆菌(++),应用2HRZ/4HR治疗,痰菌转阴,病灶吸收满意。近1个月咳嗽、痰血再次就诊。X线示右上肺前段阻塞性炎症,肺CT示前段支气管阻塞,无纵隔淋巴结肿大。
关于上消化道出血,以下哪种说法是正确的
张某2年前抵押贷款购买了一套产权40年,建筑面积50m2的商铺,首期支付50%,目前贷款余额为11.8万元,现欲出售该商铺,类似商铺目前月租金为建筑面积70元/m2,空置率为10%,经营费用为有效毛收入的10%,资本化率为5%,若由买方支付银行欠款,则张某
(2006)图示结构中,1点处的水平位移为何值?
下列关于会计等式的说法中,正确的是( )。
投资决策中用来衡量项目风险的,可以是项目的( )。
如图,平行四边形ABCD,∠ADC的角平分线DE交BC于E,且AD=14,DC=9,则的值为()。
最近发展区理论是由达维多夫提出的。()
下列有关公文稿本与法定效用关系界定错误的是:
最新回复
(
0
)