首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
61
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?
选项
A、Students’ likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher’s lecturing.
B、Students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.
C、Students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.
D、Students are not to give assessments of a teacher’s lecturing.
答案
B
解析
参考文章第二段,可知作者认为学生有能力评判教师的讲课水平。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/56iC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
WhatdowemeanbyaperfectEnglishpronunciation?InonesensethereareasmanydifferentkindsofEnglishastherearespeak
WhatdowemeanbyaperfectEnglishpronunciation?InonesensethereareasmanydifferentkindsofEnglishastherearespeak
Americansareproudoftheirvarietyandindividuality(个性),yettheyloveandrespectfewthingsmorethanauniform,whetheri
Anyonewhohaseverattendedauniversityknowsthatthequalityoflecturersvariesgreatly.Afewareveryeffectivecommunica
Oceanographyhasbeendefinedas"Theapplicationofallsciencestothestudyofthesea".Beforethenineteenthcentury,s
Normallyastudentmustattendacertainnumberofcoursesinordertograduate,andeachcoursewhichheattendsgivesacredit
Thesmallnumberofnewbornbabies,whichhasbeencausedbyhighpricesandthechangingsocialsituationofwomen,isoneoft
A、magazineB、temperatureC、grandsonD、languageB
Sandycoulddonothingbut______tohisteacherthathewaswrong.
His______wastellinghimthatsomethingwaswrong.
随机试题
以下关于氯苯那敏药理作用的叙述,错误的是
负债是过去的交易或事项所引起的潜在义务。()
在给客户配置理财产品时,需要考虑客户的风险承受能力。下列关于客户风险承受能力的说法正确的是()。
对该求助者可选用何种心理测验并说明理由。咨询时怎样制定咨询目标?
一个不透明的袋子中有3个分别标有3,1,一2的球,这些球除了所标的数字不同外其他都相同,若从袋子中随机摸出两个球,则这两个球上的两个数字之和为负数的概率是_________.
治安管理处罚包括()。
()是提高社会生产力和综合国力的战略支撑,必须摆在国家发展全局的核心位置。
设线性线性方程组λ为何值时,方程组有解,有解时,求出所有的解.
设z=z(x,y)由ex+ysin(x+z)=1所确定,试求
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayonthefollowingquestion.Youshouldwriteatleast120words
最新回复
(
0
)