首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
49
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?
选项
A、Students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.
B、Students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.
C、Students’ likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher’s lecturing.
D、Students are not to give assessments of a teacher’s lecturing.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/orlC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Foryears,childrenintheindustrialareasofEuropeandAmericaseldomlefttheirsmokycitiestoseethebeautiesofthecoun
Lyndandhundredsofyoungpeoplelikehim______thepostoftypist.
Althoughhethoughthewashelpinguswiththejob,(但他只是在碍我们的事).
Forthispartyouareallowed30minutestowriteacompositiononthetopic:Letter-writing—aForgottenArt.Youshouldwrite
Thisletterwaswrittenby______.Themanlosthisjobbecause______.
Globalsatellitecommunicationssystemswillbeusefulto______.Whichofthefollowingmaybethebesttitleforthepassage?
Whywasreadingaloudcommonbeforethenineteenthcentury?Whatisthewriter’spurposeinwritingthispassage?
Shetalkedaboutbuyingahouseinthecountry,butnothingever______.
______wasvery______thatlittleJimwrotetheletter.
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowaridcompletethefollowingdialoguesbyblackeningthecorres
随机试题
A.十二指肠球B.十二指肠升部C.十二指肠降部D.十二指肠水平部E.十二指肠空肠曲胆总管开口于
甲任邮政中心信函分拣组长期间,先后3次将各地退回信函数万封(约500公斤),以每公斤0.4元的价格卖给废品收购站,所得款项占为己有。关于本案,下列哪一选项是正确的?()(2010/2/18)
现代计算机都是冯·诺伊曼模型,该模型规定了计算机系统由存储器、控制器、运算器、输入设备和输出设备五大部分组成。其中,________________构成了主机。
对病毒和真菌污染的物品消毒,最为合适的消毒剂是
农村土地地类界线调绘时,当影像反映的界线与实地一致时,调绘的地类界线应严格与影像反映界线保持一致(重合),移位不得大于图上()mm,否则应重新标绘。
房地产供给限制特性,使得不可能出现相同房地产的大量供给。()
某公司总承包某厂煤粉制备车间新增煤粉生产线的机电设备安装工程,新生产线与原生产线相距不到10m,要求扩建工程施工期间原生产线照常运行,工程内容包括一套球磨机及其配套的输送、喂料等辅机设备安装;电气及自动化仪表安装;一座煤粉仓及车间的非标管道制作及安装;煤粉
某企业对总务部门实行定额备用金制度。总务部门备用金保管人员持有关凭证向会计部门报销,会计部门以现金补足定额,则应()。
轩辕黄帝的三大行宫指的是()。
政体是一个国家的政权组织形式,是实现国体的具体方法。()
最新回复
(
0
)