首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
64
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?
选项
A、Students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.
B、Students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.
C、Students’ likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher’s lecturing.
D、Students are not to give assessments of a teacher’s lecturing.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/orlC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Childrennormallyfeelalotof______abouttheirfirstdayatschool.
Thatactorwasalmost______(know)beforeheplayedthatpart.
Itwasessentialthattheapplicationforms______backbeforethedeadline.
Theconceptofpersonalchoiceconcerninghealthisimportantbecause______.Soundpersonalhealthchoiceisoftendifficultt
Everycitizeninademocraticcountrymay______theprotectionofthelaw.
Memoryistheabilitytokeeptrackofthingsthathavehappenedinthepast.Memoryreallyislearning.Oneneedsmemorytorid
Herearetwolettersfromourreadersexpressingtheirconcernaboutschoolassessment(评价):Studentsshouldbeallowedtos
"Doyoulikebeingmarried?""Yes,butI’mnotused______everynight."
Howcanwegetridofgarbage?Dowehaveenoughenergysourcestomeetourfutureenergyneeds?Thesearetwoimportantque
(79)TheOlympicGamesareheldeveryfouryearsinadifferentcityintheworld.Athletesfrommanycountriescompeteinavari
随机试题
人慢性粒细胞白血病肿瘤细胞特有的费城染色体产生于
脑脊液蛋白质定量检测,重复性好、灵敏度高的试验是
引起牛创伤性心包炎的异物主要来自于
仓库、油库、危化品库或堆料厂内,应配备足够组数、种类的灭火器,每组灭火器不应少于4个,每组灭火器之间的距离不应大于()m。
背景某建筑工程施工进度计划网络图如下图所示。施工中发生了以下事件:事件1:A工作因设计变更停工10天。事件2:B工作因施工质量问题返工,延长工期7天。事件3:E工作因建设单位供料延期,推迟3天施工。
《律师事务所从事证券法律业务管理办法》规定,鼓励具备()条件之一,并且最近2年未因违法执业行为受到行政处罚的律师从事证券法律业务。
在幼儿园课堂中,教师与幼儿之间是主导与主体的关系。()
的值是()。
ManyAmericansharboragrosslydistortedandexaggeratedviewofmostoftheriskssurroundingfood.FergusClydesdale,headof
Thewarhas______nationaldevelopmentbytenyears.
最新回复
(
0
)