首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Talk is cheap when it comes to solving the problem of too-big-to-fail banks. From the luxury of even today’s stuttering economic
Talk is cheap when it comes to solving the problem of too-big-to-fail banks. From the luxury of even today’s stuttering economic
admin
2015-08-29
50
问题
Talk is cheap when it comes to solving the problem of too-big-to-fail banks. From the luxury of even today’s stuttering economic recovery it is easy to vow that next time lenders’ losses will be pushed onto their creditors, not onto taxpayers.
But cast your mind back to late 2008. Then, the share prices of the world’s biggest banks could halve in minutes. Reasonable people thought that many firms were hiding severe losses. Anyone exposed to them, from speculators to churchgoing custodians of widows’ pensions, tried to yank their cash out, causing a run that threatened another Great Depression. Now, imagine being sat not in the observer’s armchair but in the regulator’s hot seat and faced with such a crisis again. Can anyone honestly say that they would let a big bank go down?
And yet, somehow, that choice is what the people redesigning the rules of finance must try to make possible. The final rules are due in November and will probably call for banks in normal times to carry core capital of at least 10% of risk-adjusted assets. This would be enough to absorb the losses most banks made during 2007-2009 with a decent margin for error.
But that still leaves the outlier banks that in the last crisis, as in most others, lost two to three times more than the average firm. Worse, the crisis has shown that if they are not rescued they can topple the entire system. That is why swaggering talk of letting them burn next time is empty. Instead, a way needs to be found to impose losses on their creditors without causing a wider panic the financial equivalent of squaring a circle.
America has created a resolution authority that will take over failing banks and force losses on unsecured creditors if necessary. That is a decent start, but may be too indiscriminate. The biggest banks each have hundreds of billions of dollars of such debt, including overnight loans from other banks, short-term paper sold to money-market funds and bonds held by pension funds. Such counterparties are likely to run from any bank facing a risk of being put in resolution which, as the recent crisis showed, could mean most banks. Indeed, the unsecured Adebt market is so important that far from destabilising it, regulators might feel obliged to underwrite it, as in 2008.
A better alternative is to give regulators draconian power but over a smaller part of banks’ balance-sheets, so that the panic is contained. The idea is practical since it means amending banks’ debt structures, not reinventing them, although banks would need roughly to double the amount of this debt that they hold. It also avoids too-clever-by-half trigger mechanisms and the opposite pitfall of a laborious legal process. Indeed, it is conceivable that a bank could be recapitalised over a weekend.
The banks worry there are no natural buyers for such securities, making them expensive to issue. In fact they resemble a bog-standard insurance arrangement in which a premium is received and there is a small chance of perhaps one in 50 each year of severe losses. Regulators would, though, have to ensure that banks didn’t buy each other’s securities and that they didn’t all end up in the hands of one investor. Last time round American International Group became the dumping ground for Wall Street’s risk and had to be bailed out too.
Would it work? The one thing certain about the next crisis is that it will feature the same crushing panic, pleas from banks and huge political pressure to stabilise the system, whatever the cost. The hope is that regulators might have a means to impose losses on the private sector in a controlled way, and not just face a binary choice between bail-out or oblivion.
In 2008, the following occurrences happened EXCEPT
选项
A、banks’ capital shrank dramatically.
B、firms pretended to profit.
C、another Great Depression followed.
D、organizations tried to take money back.
答案
C
解析
细节题。由题干定位至第二段。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/0ZOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
EffectiveAssignmentsUsingLibraryandInternetResourcesAwell-designedassignmentcanteachstudentsvaluableresearchskill
Inarecentsurvey,itwasfoundthatonly24.5percentJapanesestudentswerefullysatisfiedwithschoollife,comparedwith6
AmericanLiteratureAliteratureistherecordofhumanexperienceandpeoplehavealwaysbeenimpelledtowritedowntheirimpr
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisINCORRECT?
Themeaningsof"science"and"technology"havechangedsignificantlyfromonegenerationtoanother.Moresimilaritiesthandif
AudienceofWritingAudienceisaveryimportantconceptforwriting.Youneedtoanalyzeyouraudienceintermsofthefollowin
Punditswhowanttosoundjudiciousarefondofwarningagainstgeneralizing.Eachcountryisdifferent,theysay,andnoonest
WiththeexplosionofexcitementabouttheInternet,thereseemstobeanothertypeofaddictionthathasinvadedthehumanpsyc
Itcanbetemptingtohidefromthepeople,placesandtaskswhichmakelifestressful.Byremovingyoufromthesituation,it’s
A、Greatgeneralknowledge.B、Frequentinteraction.C、Morespontaneity.D、Goodintonation.D此题询问在演讲过程中要注意什么。其中女士说到声音的起伏也很重要,这会让人听
随机试题
患者入睡后,全身肌肉松弛、呼吸均匀、心跳减慢,需要巨大响声才能将其唤醒,该患者属于睡眠周期的哪一期
卵巢的解剖为()
熟悉传染病的潜伏期,是为了()
社区矫正的福利性是指()。
某企业研发出一项技术,可筛选出在母体中发育迟缓、智商低的婴儿,父母可据此选择流产。以做到优生优育。你认为此技术可否应该推广?
交流是复杂的艺术,有声语言并不是表达意义的唯一方式,辅以动作和面部表情,可以使表达生动形象,也折射出历史和文化智慧的光芒。各民族间的形体语言,有的形式和意义相同(如握手致意),有的虽然形式相同,意义却__________,如果不能正确解读就可能产生误会,甚
自行车:传送带
设L是一条平面曲线,其上任意一点P(x,y)(x>0)到坐标原点的距离恒等于该点处的切线在y轴上的截距,且L经过点。求L位于第一象限部分的一条切线,使该切线与L以及两坐标轴所围图形面积最小。
Musicproducesprofoundandlastingchangesinthebrain.Schoolsshouldaddmusicclasses,notcutthem.Nearly20yearsago,a
AGaintheMBArecognisedworldwideUnlikeotherMBAs,theCarfaxCollegeMBAisknownallovertheworldan
最新回复
(
0
)