首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Talk is cheap when it comes to solving the problem of too-big-to-fail banks. From the luxury of even today’s stuttering economic
Talk is cheap when it comes to solving the problem of too-big-to-fail banks. From the luxury of even today’s stuttering economic
admin
2015-08-29
63
问题
Talk is cheap when it comes to solving the problem of too-big-to-fail banks. From the luxury of even today’s stuttering economic recovery it is easy to vow that next time lenders’ losses will be pushed onto their creditors, not onto taxpayers.
But cast your mind back to late 2008. Then, the share prices of the world’s biggest banks could halve in minutes. Reasonable people thought that many firms were hiding severe losses. Anyone exposed to them, from speculators to churchgoing custodians of widows’ pensions, tried to yank their cash out, causing a run that threatened another Great Depression. Now, imagine being sat not in the observer’s armchair but in the regulator’s hot seat and faced with such a crisis again. Can anyone honestly say that they would let a big bank go down?
And yet, somehow, that choice is what the people redesigning the rules of finance must try to make possible. The final rules are due in November and will probably call for banks in normal times to carry core capital of at least 10% of risk-adjusted assets. This would be enough to absorb the losses most banks made during 2007-2009 with a decent margin for error.
But that still leaves the outlier banks that in the last crisis, as in most others, lost two to three times more than the average firm. Worse, the crisis has shown that if they are not rescued they can topple the entire system. That is why swaggering talk of letting them burn next time is empty. Instead, a way needs to be found to impose losses on their creditors without causing a wider panic the financial equivalent of squaring a circle.
America has created a resolution authority that will take over failing banks and force losses on unsecured creditors if necessary. That is a decent start, but may be too indiscriminate. The biggest banks each have hundreds of billions of dollars of such debt, including overnight loans from other banks, short-term paper sold to money-market funds and bonds held by pension funds. Such counterparties are likely to run from any bank facing a risk of being put in resolution which, as the recent crisis showed, could mean most banks. Indeed, the unsecured Adebt market is so important that far from destabilising it, regulators might feel obliged to underwrite it, as in 2008.
A better alternative is to give regulators draconian power but over a smaller part of banks’ balance-sheets, so that the panic is contained. The idea is practical since it means amending banks’ debt structures, not reinventing them, although banks would need roughly to double the amount of this debt that they hold. It also avoids too-clever-by-half trigger mechanisms and the opposite pitfall of a laborious legal process. Indeed, it is conceivable that a bank could be recapitalised over a weekend.
The banks worry there are no natural buyers for such securities, making them expensive to issue. In fact they resemble a bog-standard insurance arrangement in which a premium is received and there is a small chance of perhaps one in 50 each year of severe losses. Regulators would, though, have to ensure that banks didn’t buy each other’s securities and that they didn’t all end up in the hands of one investor. Last time round American International Group became the dumping ground for Wall Street’s risk and had to be bailed out too.
Would it work? The one thing certain about the next crisis is that it will feature the same crushing panic, pleas from banks and huge political pressure to stabilise the system, whatever the cost. The hope is that regulators might have a means to impose losses on the private sector in a controlled way, and not just face a binary choice between bail-out or oblivion.
In 2008, the following occurrences happened EXCEPT
选项
A、banks’ capital shrank dramatically.
B、firms pretended to profit.
C、another Great Depression followed.
D、organizations tried to take money back.
答案
C
解析
细节题。由题干定位至第二段。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/0ZOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Thelargestfreshwaterlakeis______inNorthernIreland.
A、thinktheircultureisbeingdestroyedB、feelitisapitytolosetheparadiseC、havedifferentideasfromtheforeignersD、a
Inarecentsurvey,itwasfoundthatonly24.5percentJapanesestudentswerefullysatisfiedwithschoollife,comparedwith6
FiveCommonMistakesinConversationsandTheirSolutionsⅠ.NotlisteningA.Problem:mostpeopledon’tlisten—waiteager
Thechangesinlanguagewillcontinueforever,butnooneknowssure【M1】______whodoesthechanging.Onepossibilityi
IntheBlackForest,theacidrainissaidtoattackallEXCEPT
SouthKorea’sstemcellscientistshaveclonedadog,smashinganotherbiologicalbarrierandreignitingafierceethicaldebate
JourneyinCatastrophes:ThreeFormsofViolentStormsI.WindsandstormsA.Winds’movinginviolentstorms—bringingabout
A、Thedateandname.B、Thepurposeofborrowingmoney.C、Theamountofmoney.D、Theinterestrate.D
随机试题
A.长期禁食、低钾血症B.消化道功能基本正常,病情严重而不能进食者C.急性肾衰竭、水中毒D.休克晚期DIC患者E.消化与吸收功能障碍,病情严重者胃肠外营养支持适宜
静脉注射以下哪种物质可使尿量增加
水肿胀满,大便秘结,小便不利,首选药物是()
根据《建设工程施工合同(示范文本)》GF一2017—0201,下列可能引起合同解除的事件中,属于发包人违约的情形是()。
在对Y公司2005年度会计报表实施审计程序前,执行该审计业务的项目负责人李欣决定先对Y公司各类业务循环的相关内部控制进行了解,并在必要时实施控制测试。对于以下具体问题,请代为做出正确的判断。
只有农民生活水平提高了,才能搞好农村基层民主建设、保持农村社会稳定。由此可见()。
中国人传统的生活方式是子孙满堂,这点很令美国老年人羡慕,儒家文化提倡“父母在,不远游”,贫困地区的父母更是将生男孩当作自己养老的保障。而美国人则认为,培养孩子是一种社会责任而不是自我“牺牲”,孩子的回报不是反哺父母,而是努力使自己成才,尽管美国有较为完善的
Oldpeoplearealwayssayingthattheyoungarenotwhattheywere.Thesame【C1】______ismadefromgenerationtogenerationand
在窗体上画一个名称为Command1的命令按钮,然后编写如下事件过程:PrivateSubCommand1_Click()Dimx(5)AsStringDimnASInteger
语句DimNewArray(10)AsInteger的含义是()。
最新回复
(
0
)