首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
If you find it hard to like James Inhofe—the Senator from Oklahoma who famously called climate change the "greatest hoax perpetr
If you find it hard to like James Inhofe—the Senator from Oklahoma who famously called climate change the "greatest hoax perpetr
admin
2016-03-10
92
问题
If you find it hard to like James Inhofe—the Senator from Oklahoma who famously called climate change the "greatest hoax perpetrated on the American people"—remember this: He was once five. That matters, because Inhofe wasn’t merely a lot younger back then, he was a lot wiser—at least where the environment is concerned. That, according to a study from the Teacher Training College in Bilbao Spain, is true not just of the gentleman from Oklahoma, but all of us.
Educators and people who work with small children know that they’re anarchists(无政府主义者)by nature, but children also live in a world full of rules. Some of those rules are taught—raise your hand in class, don’t interrupt other people: some seem more innate—don’t hit other children, don’t hurt animals. As reported in a story, psychologists like to posit the difference between telling a kindergartener that the teacher has suspended the rule against eating snacks in class and telling the same child that the teacher has suspended the no-hitting rule. In the first case, the child will grab the nearest cookie. In the second, the child will typically hesitate and refuse to hit, and may even say the teacher is wrong.
To test where living things fall on this do-no-harm spectrum, Training College researcher Jose Domingo Villaroel assembled a sample group of 118 boys and girls, ages 4 to 7, from local public schools. He started with the basics, showing the kids two sets of four pictures each—a dog, a tree, a bird and a flower: and the sun, clouds, a car and a motorcycle—and asked which of them was alive and which not. As it turned out, the youngest kids particularly would often exclude the tree from the living things category but include the car or the motorcycle.
Villaroel next asked them to respond to two situations. In the first they were presented with a set of social rules(rules against nose-picking and eating sloppily)and a set of interpersonal rules(don’t take other kids’ toys or hurt other kids). In the second they were presented the same social rules and a set of environmental rules(don’t step on flowers, don’t carve your name into a tree with a knife). In both cases they were asked to pick which rules were the worse ones to break. In both cases the social rules were abandoned first.
It was perhaps unsurprising that kids understand intuitively why harming other children is a worse offense than showing bad manners. Even at an early age children have a growing sense of empathy, and they understand what it would feel like to be hit themselves or have a toy taken away. But children aren’t flowers or trees, and yet they showed them equal concern—and that included the kids who didn’t realize that plant life is life at all.
The study is hardly airtight. It’s possible that the children did not give a hoot about the flowers and were just parroting rules they’d been taught or had observed. But they were taught the good-manners rule too. Villaroel wasn’t concerned with whether they understood right and wrong as absolutes, but rather in degrees—which thing was more right or more wrong. And on that metric, nature scored a big win.
There’s a whole lot of developmental ground covered between the time you’re a five-year-old pre-schooler and a 55-year-old policymaker, and our better angels don’t always survive the trip. But it’s encouraging to know we start out with them—and it’s worth trying to hang onto them as long as we can.
Which of the following can NOT be inferred from the end of the passage?
选项
A、Though the research was not scientifically accurate, it pointed to some encouraging results.
B、There are many factors influencing one’s outlook during his/her growing up.
C、The virtuous die young, but the evil leave a stink for ten thousand years.
D、The author urges us to become more environmentally-conscious as the society develops.
答案
C
解析
推断题。根据最后一段,从孩童到55岁的政策制定者的旅程中有很多成长空间,而且我们当中更善良的天使们并不都能活到那个岁数,此句为部分否定,无法就此推断“好人不长命、恶人却遗臭万年”,故[C]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/zmPK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Thegovernmentistobanpaymentstowitnessesbynewspapersseekingtobuyuppeopleinvolvedinprominentcases【C1】______the
Ithinkyoucantakea(n)______languagecoursetoimproveyourEnglish.[2003]
Todayinmind-bendinglycoolstuffthatnanoparticles(纳米粒子)cando:AteamofresearchersatRiceUniversityinTexashasdemonst
Todayinmind-bendinglycoolstuffthatnanoparticles(纳米粒子)cando:AteamofresearchersatRiceUniversityinTexashasdemonst
Incollaborationwithotherhealthpartners,anEarlyWarningSystemhasbeenestablished.Theunderlinedpartmeans______.
Accordingtothepassage,whatproblemdoestherecentresearchfind?
DoyouknowTim’sbrother?Heis_____thanTim.
Thesizeofthenewlybroadenedsquareisfourtimes______ofthepreviousone.
A、Theyaregoodwaysofsocialnetworking.B、Theyareallinterestingandexciting.C、Theycanimproveworkingefficiency.D、The
A、25pounds.B、75pounds.C、100pounds.D、200pounds.C①由题目选项判断本题考查钱数,听音时需记下相关的笔记。②由对话可知,男士和“mysisterandourparents”一家四口一起旅游,
随机试题
简述心智技能的培养要求。
A.胃大部切除术B.全胃切除术C.胃空肠吻合术D.胃癌根治术十二指肠溃疡合并大出血时的术式是
男,45岁,3年前中上腹间歇性隐痛,常于饭前或饭后4~5小时发生,偶尔睡眠时发生。进食后痛可好转。当地医务室诊为“胃炎”,服药后缓解。4天前上腹疼痛加剧,服阿托品无效,进食后不缓解。昨日解柏油样便3次,每次约150g,故来院诊治。体检:口唇无发绀,两肺(-
指出下列错误的是
总承包单位应当自行完成建设工程主体结构的施工。
应用软件是计算机各种应用程序的总称,主要功能是处理实际问题或完成某一具体工作。()
银行业金融机构应充分尊重并自觉保障金融消费者的权利包括()。
本月销项税额为( )万元。本月应纳增值税为( )万元。
正如克里南伯格所言,和结婚一样,独居也是生活的可选项,视每个人“实现自我”的需要而定。它是社会发展到一定阶段的产物,不应受到排斥和歧视,它所通向的则是充满挑战因而也是前景不甚清晰的未来。因此,我们眼下似乎更应将讨论的焦点从围追堵截的道德批判,转移到更为务实
某二叉树中度为2的节点有18个,则该二叉树中有______个叶子节点。
最新回复
(
0
)