首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞).
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞).
admin
2010-01-13
89
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness (分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
The passage suggests that in for-profit organizations ______
选项
A、there is no end of conflict
B、expression of different opinions is encouraged
C、decisions must be justifiable
D、success lies in general agreement
答案
D
解析
由第四段最后一句可知,经理们(executives)相信大家意见一致(consensus)而非意见不和(conflict)会提高财经指数(financial indicators)。这与D选项“对于以盈利为目的机构来说,成功在于意见的大致统一(general agreement)”基本一致。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/zNmi777K
0
在职申硕(同等学力)英语
相关试题推荐
睾丸肿瘤辅助检查应首选
尿脱落细胞学检查适用于
Revengeisoneofthosethingsthateveryoneenjoys.Peopledon’tliketotalkaboutit,though.Justthesame,thereisnothing
Revengeisoneofthosethingsthateveryoneenjoys.Peopledon’tliketotalkaboutit,though.Justthesame,thereisnothing
Hedoesnothingthatviolatestheinterestsofthecollective.
Inthispart,youaretowritewithin30minutesacompositionofnolessthan150wordsunderthetitleof"MyOpinionAboutBl
Comparedwiththeircosmologist(宇宙学家)colleagues,cosmogonists(星源学家)cansoundalittleold-fashioned.EdgarAllenPoeturnedto
Directions:Inthispart,youaretowritewithin30minutesacompositionofnolessthan150wordsaboutTheEnergyUsedinAm
Ihaveaninfatuation(迷恋)withautumn.Thecolorsoftheseason,andthesmells,havealwaysthrilledme.Ihavealwaysfoundjoy
Meanwhile,Ialwayskeptintouchwithmyformerprofessoratcollege,byletterandtelephone.
随机试题
试回答下列反光标线逆反射亮度系数实测检验评定的相关问题。非雨夜白色反光标线最高级别的逆反射亮度系数为()。
在Excel中,打印质量通过“页面设置”对话框中的()标签进行设置。
青霉素过敏性休克抢救应首选
A、10~40U/LB、≤50U/LC、40~150U/LD、45~150U/LE、60~80U/L男性血清碱性磷酸酶正常值是
职业病按发病过程可分为()三种病型。
下列关于营业税申报与缴纳,的说法中,表述正确的有()。
下列关于优抚社区工作的成效描述哪一项是正确的?()
加涅根据学习的结果将学习分为智慧技能、_________、言语信息、_________和_________。
孟德斯鸠在《论法的精神》中曾阐述过这个问题:在封建社会,社会的主要动力是荣宠。也就是说,在那时候,荣宠和身份权利,决定了一个人社会地位的高低,一个开国世袭的落魄男爵要比一个腰缠万贯的商人有地位得多。而在当代社会,社会地位变得多元化起来,可仍然逃不出三个可以
我国人民民主专政与人民代表大会制度有十分密切的关系,以下对两者关系叙述不正确的是
最新回复
(
0
)