首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon.com’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of h
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon.com’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of h
admin
2013-10-22
64
问题
Farewell, Libraries?
Amazon.com’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of hardcover books came as no surprise. It had to happen sometime. But the news did conjure quite an interesting mental image.-libraries that from now on will look smaller and less crowded.
For the moment, let’s not argue with the proposition that people will read as much as they ever have, no matter whether they read an actual book or a book on a screen. The habits of readers may not change(if anything, people may read ore, or at least buy more—several stories have quoted e-book owners who say they buy more titles for their e-readers than they did when they were buying hardcover books). But if readers aren’t changing, their environments will. Rooms that once held books will well, whatever they hold from now on, it won’t be books, or not as many books. Theoretically, your space will be more spare, more serenely uncluttered. That’s the theory, at least. My experience is that stuff expands to fill the space available. But you can dream.
All of this has already happened big time in the music business, where downloads have gradually but surely replaced CDs. I don’t know how many people I’ve overheard crowing because they managed to transfer their entire music collections onto their computers. All those CDs taking up space on the wall have gone—All those CDs that travel from car to kitchen to bedroom to living room, with the CD and the case getting separated somewhere along the way a problem no more in the digital age. From now on, we’ll own what might be described as the idea of stuff, since the actual physical things- records, tapes, photographs, CDs, and now books — have been as good as vaporized, with the information contained therein stored away on a hard drive.
This, of course, is merely collateral(并行的)damage in the digital revolution, if damage it is. There’s as yet no way to tell if this transition is good, bad, both, or neither, but surely the absence of a physical library, be it musical or literary, marks a fundamental shift in the way we live and think about things. In music, for example, the rise of iTunes, Pandora, YouTube, and all the other online music players has quickly eroded our devotion to the long-playing album as the principal means of organizing music. After a half century of neglect, the lowly single is back on top. Most immediately this has consequences for artists, maybe not so much for the people who buy their music. But who knows?
With books, the absence of packaging does nothing to the contents. 1 can buy a hardcover copy of Moby-Dick or download it onto an e-reader, and Melville is still Melville. But I grew up loving Rockwell Kent’s illustrations of that novel, and later Barry Moser’s. It’s hard to think of the book without them. I can do that, certainly, but some little thing is lost.
Paperbacks and public libraries made books cheap or free but certainly available to millions who might otherwise not have been able to afford them, and all that happened long before I was born. Nevertheless, I was brought up by people who had been taught —and who taught me—that books were valuable things, things to be cared for and cherished, and I have owned some volumes for close to half a century(almost none of them, 1 should point out, qualify as "collectible" or valuable to an antiquarian book collector; owning a rare book makes me nervous. I like books I can hold, read, and even here my mother is spinning in her grave write in).
I come from a generation for whom the books and records on the shelf signaled, in some way, who you were(starting with the fact that you were a person who owned books or records or CDs). If you visited a friend, you took the first chance you had to secretly scan that friend’s shelves to get a handle on the person. I suppose I could sneak a peek at a friend’s Kindle, but is that the same? And try that kind of snooping on a bus or in a coffee shop and you’ll probably get arrested.
The stuff of our lives is a comfort. We look up at the shelves and we see old friends. Yes, there are books on my shelves that aren’t my friends, that I haven’t finished or even started, but someday I will, I promise—my home library is a physical manifestation of ambivalence. There is comfort in the continuity of seeing the same books year after year. I guess there might be some of the same pleasure in scrolling through a digital library or music playlist, but somehow I think something will be lost.
For years audiophiles(音响爱好者)have tried to persuade more casual music fans that a vinyl record played on a decent sound system sounds better than a digital recording played on the same system. Digital sound is not as warm, not as seductive to the ear. The resurgence, albeit modest, of vinyl, especially among young listeners and musicians, proves that this argument is not generational. It’s not, in other words, just old fogies versus young hipsters.
Something of the same argument might be made for books, or for the tactile(触觉的)pleasure of holding and reading a well-made book. At its simplest, a book is a tool, or an information-delivery system, if you will, and it does what it does supremely well. To conceive of a world without physical books is to conceive of a world somehow diminished. It may be more efficient—yes, you can take a "stack" of books on vacation with an e-reader. It may spare quite a few forests from the ax. But efficiency is no substitute for pleasure. The future may be less cluttered. It may also be less fun.
What will be the result of the digital revolution if there isn’t a physical library?
选项
A、Our lifestyle and way of thinking will be changed.
B、There will be more bad consequences than good ones.
C、The life of both artists and buyers will be changed.
D、More online bookstores will appear.
答案
A
解析
同义转述题。定位句表明,虽然无法确定数字革命是好是坏,但是实体图书馆的缺失一定会使我们的生活和思维方式发生根本性变化。由此可知答案为A)“我们的生活和思维方式将会发生变化”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/zKc7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、BecauseshelikesAmericanhistory.B、Becausesheisinterestedinwritingfornewspapers.C、Becauseshedoesnotwanttolose
A、Themanhaschangedhisdestination.B、Themanisreturninghisticket.C、ThemanisflyingtoNewYorktomorrowmorning.D、Th
A、Lessfreedomandmoremoney.B、Morefreedomandmoremoney.C、Educationsystem.D、Livinginpoorareas.B细节辨认题。原文明确表述了青少年犯罪的四个
AccordingtoUKgovernmentfigures,Englishliteraturegraduatesgetintoemploymentslightlylessquicklythansciencegraduate
A、Alistofsoftwareproducts.B、Apictureofthenewestcomputers.C、Informationonafter-salesservice.D、Anintroductionabou
A、Shepaidbycheck.B、Shedecidednottomakethepurchase.C、Shepaidbycreditcard.D、Sheleftwithoutpaying.CW:Doyouac
WhenMITputtheircoursecontentonlinein2002,theywereexpectingtheirsitetobeoneofthemostpopularsitesaroundthe
A、HeenjoyedteachingEnglish.B、Hewantedtoearnmoretosupporthisfamily.C、Theowneroftheschoolpromisedhimagoodpos
Whentheearthwasborntherewasnoocean.Thegraduallycoolingearthwasenvelopedinheavylayersofcloud,which【S1】_____mu
A、Itcanbeusedtocurethescar.B、ItisrichinwaterandVitaminA.C、Itcanreducethewrinklesoftheface.D、Itiseffect
随机试题
下列哪项是扩容的指征
某女,小腹包块,带多色黄、臭秽,少腹及腰骶部疼痛而胀,经期加重,尿少色黄,月经量多,舌红,苔黄腻,脉弦滑数。其治法
A.0.015~0.03gB.0.3~0.9gC.0.9~1.2gD.1.5~3gE.2~5g
女,33岁,昨晚吃街边烧烤后于今凌晨3时突然畏寒、高热、呕吐不止,伴有腹泻,腹泻4次,开始为稀水样便,继之便中带有黏液和脓血。在医院检验室检查的情况下,该患者可能的诊断是()。
在企业与关联方发生交易的情况下,企业应当在会计报表附注中披露()。
期货从业人员要做到严格自律、洁身自好,具体做到( )。
动脉壁上的压力感受器感受动脉血压变化使相应的传入神经产生动作电位可看作()。
为实现决策目标,通过命令、指示等信息传递,使他人按照管理要求行事的手段叫做()。
有老师和甲、乙、丙三个学生,现在老师的年龄刚好是这三个学生的年龄之和;9年后,老师的年龄将是甲、乙两个学生的年龄之和;又5年后,老师的年龄将是甲、丙两个学生的年龄之和;再3年后,老师的年龄将是乙、丙两个学生的年龄之和。那么现在老师的年龄是()岁。
写出从哈希表中删除关键字为K的一个记录的算法。设哈希函数为H,解决冲突的方法为链地址法。
最新回复
(
0
)