首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A burglar was shot dead by the owner of the house being broken into. Do you think the owner’s action was justified?
A burglar was shot dead by the owner of the house being broken into. Do you think the owner’s action was justified?
admin
2016-08-02
44
问题
A burglar was shot dead by the owner of the house being broken into. Do you think the owner’s action was justified?
选项
答案
Ever since the incident that a burglar was shot dead by the owner of the house being broken into was reported in the newspapers, there has been much controversy about it. After weighing all the pros and cons, I find that I agree that the owner’s action was justified. I support my point of view with three arguments: self-defense, the sanctity of property and the need to deter criminals. First, everyone has the right of self-defense. When a burglar breaks into somebody else’s house, he is a potential threat to the lives of the people who live there. Therefore, the house owner has the right to defend himself and his family with any weapon he can lay his hands on. If that weapon happens to be a gun, the burglar only has himself to blame. Second, it is a principle of law that private property is inviolable. A person’s home is probably the most precious thing he has, and usually contains most of the things that the house owner considers valuable. He has the right to protect the things he has worked hard to accumulate, especially against a thief. Third, there is far too much crime nowadays, and many people think that the courts are too lenient with burglars when they are caught. By shooting the burglar dead, the house owner did a great service for society. In fact, his action sent a warning to other burglars that if they break into other people’s houses, they are risking their lives. All in all, I think that the house owner’s action was a good one in three aspects. He benefited himself, by preventing the burglar harming him. He benefited the rule of law by asserting the right of a person to safeguard his own property. And, last but not least, he benefited society by deterring would-be burglars.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/zAVO777K
本试题收录于:
雅思写作题库雅思(IELTS)分类
0
雅思写作
雅思(IELTS)
相关试题推荐
Foundedin1983,themagazineincreaseditscirculationmorethandoublesincethen,anditsadvertising.
Becausenaturalgasiscomposedmostlyofmethane,asimplehydrocarbon,vehiclespoweredbynaturalgasemitlessofcertainpo
NewJersey’sisoneofthefivehighestnumberofreportedcasesofLymediseaseintheUnitedStates.
Doctorsgenerallyagreethatsuchfactorsascigarettesmoking,eatingrichfoodshighinfats,andalcoholconsumptionnotonly
Studentsinthemetropolitanschooldistrictlackmathskillstosuchalargedegreetomakeitdifficulttoabsorbthemintoa
Thegrowingdemandforhousing,trafficcongestion,andlongercommutingtripshasallbuteliminatedthecostadvantageofowni
Despiteprotestsfromsomewaste-disposalcompanies,statehealthofficialshaveorderedthelevelsofbacteriainseawateratp
TheNationalTransportationSafetyBoardhasrecommendedtheuseoffail-safemechanismsonairlinercargodoorlatchesassuring
InForcesofProduction,DavidNobleexaminesthetransformationofthemachine-toolindustryastheindustrymovedfromrelian
Thepercentdecreaseinaveragenumberofproductionhoursperwidgetfrom1990to2000wasapproximately
随机试题
凸轮划线要准确、清晰,曲线连接要平滑。()
葡萄胎与多胎妊娠的鉴别主要依据是
A、药物引起的反应与个人体质有关,与用药剂量无关B、等量药物引起和一般病人相似但强度更高的药理效应或毒性C、用药一段时间后,病人对药物产生精神上的依赖,中断用药后,会出现主观上的不适D、长期用药后,产生了生理上的依赖,停药后
A.结核球B.原发型肺结核C.肺脓肿D.结节病E.浸润型肺结核患者,男性,30岁。农民。症见低热、乏力、干咳1个月。体检:浅表淋巴结无肿大,肺部无异常体征,胸片示右肺门淋巴结肿大,诊断首先考虑
施工现场临时用电工程,电源中性点直接接地的220V/380V三相四线制低压电力系统,下列各项中符合相关规定的有()。
如果物资验收人库的同时支付货款,则通过“应付账款”账户核算。如果物资验收入库后仍未付款,则按发票账单金额通过银行存款核算。()
甲公司2017年1月1日发行3年期可转换债券,每年1月1日付息、到期一次还本的债券,面值总额为10000万元,实际收款10200万元,票面年利率为4%,实际利率为6%。债券包含的负债成分的公允价值为9465.40万元,2018年1月1日,某债券持有人将其持
下列各项属于人民群众创造历史的作用的表现的有()。
欲穷千里目,更上一层楼:王之涣
Youdon’tfindmanypeoplethesedayswhowouldkeepabeeintheirpurse.Butcatchingthefirstbeeseeninthespringwasonc
最新回复
(
0
)