首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A couple of years ago a group of management scholars from Yale and the University of Pittsburgh tried to discover if there was a
A couple of years ago a group of management scholars from Yale and the University of Pittsburgh tried to discover if there was a
admin
2014-09-17
46
问题
A couple of years ago a group of management scholars from Yale and the University of Pittsburgh tried to discover if there was a link between a company’s success and the personality of its boss. To work out what that personality was, they asked senior managers to score their bosses for such traits as an ability to communicate an exciting vision of the future or to stand as a good model for others to follow. When the data were analyzed, the researchers found no evidence of a connection between how well a firm was doing and what its boss was like. As far as they could tell, a company could not be judged by its chief executive any better than a book could be judged by its cover.
A few years before this, however, a team of psychologists from Tufts University, led by Nalini Ambady, discovered that when people watched two-second-long film-clips of professors lecturing, they were pretty good at determining how able a teacher each professor actually was. At the end of the study, the perceptions generated by those who had watched only the clips were found to match those of students taught by those self-same professors for a full semester.
Now, Dr Ambady and her colleague, Nicholas Rule, have taken things a step further. They have shown that even a still photograph can convey a lot of information about competence—and that it can do so in a way which suggests the assessments of all those senior managers were poppycock.
Dr Ambady and Mr. Rule showed 100 undergraduates the faces of the chief executives of the top 25 and the bottom 25 companies in the Fortune 1,000 list. Half the students were asked how good they thought the person they were looking at would be at leading a company and half were asked to rate five personality traits on the basis of the photograph. These traits were competence, dominance, likeability, facial maturity (in other words, did the individual have an adult-looking face or a baby-face) and trustworthiness.
By a useful (though hardly unexpected) coincidence, all the businessmen were male and all were white, so there were no confounding variables of race or sex. The study even controlled for age, the emotional expression in the photos and the physical attractiveness of the individuals by obtaining separate ratings of these from other students-and using statistical techniques to remove their effects.
This may sound like voodoo. Psychologists spent much of the 20th century denigrating the work of 19th-century physiognomists and phrenologists who thought the shapes of faces and skulls carry information about personality. However, recent work has shown that such traits can, indeed, be assessed from photographs of faces with a reasonable accuracy.
And Dr Ambady and Mr. Rule were surprised by just how accurate the students’ observations were. The results of their study, which are about to be published in Psychological Science, show that both the students’ assessments of the leadership potential of the bosses and their ratings for the traits of competence, dominance and facial maturity were significantly related to a company’s profits. Moreover, the researchers discovered that these two connections were independent of each other. When they controlled for the "power" traits, they still found the link between perceived leadership and profit, and when they controlled for leadership they still found the link between profit and power.
These findings suggest that instant judgments by the ignorant (nobody even recognized Warren BuffeR) are more accurate than assessments made by well-informed professionals. It looks as if knowing a chief executive disrupts the ability to judge his performance.
Sadly, the characteristics of likeability and trustworthiness appear to have no link to company profits, suggesting that when it comes to business success, being warm and fuzzy does not matter much (though these milts are not harmful). But this result also suggests yet another thing that stock market analysts might care to take into account when preparing their reports: the physiognomy of the chief executive.
The author will most probably agree on the idea that
选项
A、there is no connection between physiognomy and personality.
B、people can assess the personality traits on the basis of photograph.
C、workers’ personality traits are related to the company’s profit.
D、a baby-face looking is good to the company’s success.
答案
B
解析
第6段最后一句提到,最近的研究表明such traits可以相当准确地从面部照片估计。而such traits指的是前一句中提到的personality,因此B项符合原文,也就是作者最可能认同的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/xmdO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhichcountryisknownastheLandofMapleLeaf?
LeavingHomeGenerally,mostpeoplehaveintheirmindsapictureoftheir"idealhome",butifyouarestudentsorpeopleju
HowMarketLeadersKeepTheirEdgeResearchfindsthattherearethreemethodswithwhichbigcompanieskeeptheiradvantages
BasicCulturalTypesAsbusinessgoesglobal,businessmenhavecometofindthepeopleindifferentculturesactquitediffe
AsthemerchantmanclassexpandedintheeighteenthcenturyNorth1.______.AmericanColonies,thesilversmithandthecoppersmi
不要抛弃学问你们现在要离开母校了。我没有什么礼物送你们,只好送你们一句话罢。这一句话是:“不要抛弃学问。”以前的功课也许有一大部分是为了这张毕业文凭,不得已而做的,从今以后,你们可以依自己的心愿去自由研究了。趁现在年富力强的时候,努力做
OnlineTherapyIsn’tShrinkingOnlinetherapyisdangerous,criticssay.Quackscouldsetupshopandcheatcustomers.Disco
AGenomeMilestoneItwasthebiggestscientificgrudgematchsincethespacerace.TheGenomeWarshadeverything:twogrou
LANDUSEAproblemrelatedtothecompetitionforlanduseiswhethercropsshouldbeusedtoproducefoodorfuel.【L1】___
IwasinnorthernKenya,whichissufferingthroughtheworstdroughttohittheHornofAfricain60years.Thetollofdepri
随机试题
在中国学者的政策议程确立模型中,被认为日渐式微的模型是
既能燥湿健脾,又能发汗解表的药物是
妊娠合并心脏病,其发病率最高的是
药品质量标准的主要内容有
在金融市场上资金供求双方自由竞争所形成的利率属于()。
某小区居住的张女士,经常在小区广场上打太极拳,广场周围有几株粗大的老杨树。寒冬已至,树叶已落,枯枝清晰可见。突然,一阵风刮来,枯枝纷纷坠落,来不及躲闪的张女士被一根较粗的枯枝砸倒在地。张女士被小区保安人员送到医院,诊断为:颈椎损伤。【问题】物
甲在某商场购物时与乙发生口角,甲试图殴打乙。商场保安、售货员见状,极力阻止甲伤人,并且报警。但是由于甲力气太大,保安及售货员未能阻止,甲将乙打伤。对于乙的损失()
道德底线
WhatdoesAlisonorder?
TopicHowShouldCollegeStudentsSpendTheirSpareTime?Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayen
最新回复
(
0
)