首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation. For each questi
Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation. For each questi
admin
2013-08-22
74
问题
Read the following extract from an article about the advantages of making the first offer/demand in negotiation.
For each question 15—20, mark one letter(A, B, C, or D)on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Making the first offer/demand can give a psychological advantage. During a negotiation, issues, positions, and even interests shift and realign in accordance with a managed disclosure of information. Understanding the power of perception is paramount. If one person acquires the power to manipulate the perception of others, that person enjoys a subtle but powerful advantage. Making the first significant move can be a powerful statement and can affect others’ perceptions of the one making the offer and of the situation in general. In military terms, the opening gambit is "taking the initiative". Once one party takes the initiative, the other side frequently finds it difficult to regain its own momentum.
Making a competent first offer/demand can take control of the entire negotiation. A competent opening gambit goes hand in hand with the idea of creating a psychological advantage. The concept is analogous to the theory of "primacy" in a courtroom trial. That is, once a participant gets the initiative and competently runs with it, the other side usually remains in a reactive mode. There are techniques that good strategists can sometimes use to regain the initiative, but such procedures tend to be "dicey". Unless recovery strategies are executed deftly by an experienced negotiator, the party trying to regain the initiative runs the risk of turning a negotiation into a confrontational/adversarial event. Such an outcome gives rise to a host of difficulties.
Making a well-thought-out first offer/demand shows confidence in your position. It has been said that the law is what is forcefully stated and plausibly maintained. Likewise, in negotiation, if one party makes a strong plausible opening, that opening can often convince the other party that this offer merits careful consideration — that it is credible. If presented in the right way, a well-thought-out first offer can send a message that the party making the offer is strong and confident. Such an offer can cause the other party to rethink his or her position.
It is important to note, however, that this confidence factor edge is limited to a good faith offer made with the intent of actually making a deal. If the offer or demand is merely a fishing expedition, that is tantamount to positioning by making a very low or very high opening. Then the tone and words used to couch the offer should be chosen so that they effectively transmit the intent behind the offer. Giving unsupportable figures wrapped in a mantle of credibility is very confusing and could sabotage the whole negotiation process.
Making an effective first offer/demand shows preparation. A well prepared, strong, confident opening offer/demand sends a message that "This person did his/her homework". Unfortunately, too many times the parties do not adequately prepare for a negotiation. When one party prepares well and the other does not, the result can be intimidating to the less prepared person. Without even intending to, the better prepared party takes the initiative and does not lose it. The prepared negotiator is usually the one who claims the larger surplus in a given negotiation.
However, in some circumstances a better prepared person might choose to wait and let the other party make the first offer. Such a strategy still can be consistent with the overall theme presented here, namely, that the first move—the opening gambit—should be a thoughtful, considered move. It should not be a default.
What is created by both a competent first offer/demand and "primacy" in a courtroom trial?
选项
A、The perception of others.
B、A reactive mode.
C、A confrontational event.
D、A psychological advantage.
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/xj7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
WhattypeofbusinessisHarmonyforLess?
WhattypeofbusinessisHarmonyforLess?
Whatkindofbusinessdoesthewomanworkat?
Globalization:Disadvantagestoglobalization(全球化危害)
ManagementSkills:theimportanceofeffectivedecision-makingprocedureswithinacompany
谈论有关企业管理、股市及相关话题Doyouthinkthatcompanystaffshouldwearuniforms?
Whatqualitiesdoesagoodemployeeneedtohave?(Whatshouldagoodemployeebelike?)
A.GreenwoodPublishingGroupTheGreenwoodPublishingGroupisoneoftheworld’sleadingpublishersofreferencetitles,acade
随机试题
可以原型由肾排泄的氟喹诺酮类药物有
白头翁汤中没有哪些药物()
A.精囊B.前列腺C.睾丸D.附睾E.阴茎海绵体属于不成对附属腺体的是【】
肠鸣音大约每分钟4~5次为肠鸣音达每分钟10次以上,音调不特别高亢为
某建筑公司劳务工朱某在建造码头工地上,因安全帽掉落江中,为打捞安全帽游入江中淹溺死亡。问题:如何防范该类事故的发生?
赵某、钱某、孙某、李某共同出资设立甲普通合伙企业(下称“甲企业”)。合伙协议约定:(1)赵某、孙某、李某以货币各出资10万元,钱某以房屋作价出资10万元。(2)合伙人向合伙人以外的人转让其在甲企业中的全部或者部分财产份额时,须经半数以上合伙人同意。(
某小学5年级1班在操场上体育课,学习踢足球。体育老师在给学生讲解完踢足球的要领及注意事项之后,把班上的学生分成几个小组练习。李某(10岁)和王某(11岁)分在一个组内。由于地面不平,李某在奔跑的过程中不慎摔倒,恰好被跑上前来的王某踩在腿上,导致小腿骨折。此
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性:
标志我国古典小说现实主义艺术发展高峰和总结的清代小说是《_______》。
ABiologicalClockEverylivingthinghaswhatscientistscallabiologicalclockthatcontrolsbehavior.Thebiologicalclockt
最新回复
(
0
)