首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2011-05-29
94
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross-examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the Continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal"— essentially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this was eventually abandoned, the two systems parted company. On the Continent, church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jury. The jurymen were often illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their Constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, American lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare them themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case; the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed lo meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. By being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
In Britain, newspapers ______.
选项
A、do the same as American newspapers do
B、are not interested in publishing details about the trial before it takes place
C、are not allowed to publish details about the trial before it takes place
D、are allowed to publish details about the trial before it takes place
答案
C
解析
文中作者在第四段第二句和第三句谈到,英美两国在受理重刑案件时一个最显著的区别是:美国法律并不阻止报纸和电视在庭审前对这类案件的大肆渲染。由此可见,在审理重刑案件之前,英国法律是不允许报纸报道任何细节的。因此这道题的正确答案应当为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/xC6O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Lookatthechartbelow.Itshowstheproduction,salesandrejectionofproductsineightcompanies(A-H)ofagivenmonth.Whi
①TemporarySecretaryRequired②Abilitytoproducehighqualityreportsandtestresultsaccuratelyandefficientlyisrequired:
TheDevelopmentProgrammeManagementProcessAEstablishingareviewboardfordevelopmentsBEstablishingreviewcriteriaandm
IncomeinequalityintheUnitedStatesremainedrelativelystableforaperiodofnearlyfortyyears.Beginninginthe1970’s,h
Theanalysissuggeststhatthetradeoffbetweenourchildren’scollegeandourownretirementsecurityischilling.
Earthquakes【S1】AttwominutestonooninSeptember1of1923,thegreatclockinTgkyostopped.【S2】TokyoBayshookasifhu
Contradictorytopopularbelief,recentsurveysshowthatbesideshousewives,manycollegestudentsarealso______tosoapoper
(Hardlyhehad)entered(theoffice)whenherealized(thathe)(hadforgotten)hiswallet.
【81】AttwominutestonooninSeptember1of1923,thegreatclockinTokyostopped.【82】TokyoBayshookasifhugerughadbeen
TheAleuts(阿留申人)werenamedsobyRussians,buttheycallthemselvesUnanganwhichmeans"thepeople."Theyarenativeinhabit
随机试题
司法解释的解释形式分为
男性,62岁,反复发作胸痛10年,活动后心悸,气促2年,3年前曾患急性心肌梗死。心电图检查示前间壁陈旧性心肌梗死。血压130/86mmHg,心率98次/min,节律齐,无心脏杂音。未发现任何黄色瘤。血脂测定结果为:TG2.2mm01/L,TC1mm01/L
男性患者,25岁,因胸部被汽车撞伤,左胸第4~7肋骨骨折,皮下气肿与瘀斑,心音消失,颈、股动脉未扪及搏动,已做气管插管人工呼吸法,尚应采取
水的CT值是
患儿,1岁。米糊+牛奶喂养,未添加辅食。面色苍白、食欲不振3个月。辅助检查:Hb90g/L,血涂片红细胞大小不等,小细胞为多。该患者患病的主要原因是
制定大气卫生标准的研究中,进行长期吸入染毒实验的目的是
下列哪项不是有限责任公司章程中应当载明的事项?()。
关于陈述性知识,下列说法正确的是()。
下列各句中,没有语病的一句是()
打开表单formtest,完成下面操作。(1)表单标题设置为“考试系统”。(2)在表单上添加一个标签控件,显示“欢迎使用考试系统”,字体的颜色为红色。(3)向表单内添加一个计时器控件,名为Timerfor。(4)将计时器控件
最新回复
(
0
)