首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
admin
2011-02-11
117
问题
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish population is in shrinking. The study, the National Jewish Population Survey, found 5.2 million Jews living in the United States in 2000, a drop of 5 percent, or 300,000 people, since a similar study in 1990. What’s truly startling is that the reported decline is not true. Worse still, the sponsor of the $6 million study, United Jewish Communities, knows it.
Both it and the authors have openly admitted their doubts. They have acknowledged in interviews that the population totals for 2000 and i990 were reached by different methods and are not directly comparable. The survey itself also cautions readers, in a dauntingly technical appendix, that judgment calls by the researchers may have led to an undercount. When the research director and project director were asked whether the data should be construed to indicate a declining Jewish population, they flatly answered no. In addition, other survey researchers interviewed pointed to other studies with population estimates as high as 6.7 million.
Despite all this, the two figures --5.2 million now, 5.5 million then--are listed by side in the survey, leaving the impression that the population has shrunk. The result, predictably, has been a rash of headlines trumpeting the illusionary decline, in turn touching off jeremiads by rabbis and moralists condemning the religious laxity behind it. Whether out of ideology, ego, incompetence or a combination of all three, the respected charity has invented a crisis.
United Jewish Communities is the coordinating body for a national network of Jewish philanthropies with combined budgets of $2 billion. Its population surveys carry huge weight in shaping community policy. This is not the first time the survey has set off a false alarm. The last one, conducted by a predecessor organization, found that 52 percent of American Jews who married between 1985 and 1990 did so outside the faith. That number was a fabrication produced by including marriages in which neither party was Jewish by anyone’s definition, including the researchers.
Its publication created a huge stir, inspiring anguished sermons, books and conferences. It put liberals on the defensive, emboldened conservatives who reject full integration into society and alienated ordinary folks by the increasingly xenophobic tone of Jewish communal culture. The new survey, to its credit, retracts that figure and offers the latest survey has spawned a panic created by the last one.
So why did the organization flawed figures once again? Some scholars who have studied the survey believe the motivation then came partly out of a desire to shock straying Jews into greater observance. It’s too early to tell if that’s the case this time around. What is clear is the researchers did their job with little regard to how their data could be misconstrued. They used statistical models and question formats that, while internally sound, made the new survey incompatible with the previous one. For example, this time the researchers divided the population of 5.2 million into two groups--"highly involved" Jews and "people of Jewish background"-- and posed most questions only to the first group. As a result, most findings about belief and observance refer only to a subgroup of American Jews, making comparisons to the past impossible.
We can’t afford to wait a decade before these figures are revised. The false population decline must be corrected before it further sours communal discourse. The United Jewish Communities owes it to itself and its public to step forward and state plainly what it knows to be true: American Jews are not disappearing.
When the author is talking about the Jewish Population Survey, he seems ______.
选项
A、to believe the shrinking of the Jews in America
B、to support the rejection of full integration into society
C、to blame United Jewish Communities
D、to be willing to tolerate the fault of United Jewish Communities
答案
C
解析
文章的主要内容是揭示调查所得出的犹太人口下降谬论并指出其负面影响。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/wieO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Accordingtothereport,thecontestwilllast______days.
MoneyinAmericaMoneyisusedtobuygoodsorservicesand【1】______debts.【1】______InAmerica,moneysupplyconsists
A、BritishB、AmericanC、IndianD、IranianC考查学生对新闻中Indian-born和试题中byorigin的理解。
Althoughthedistributionofrecordedmusicwentdigitalwiththeintroductionofthecompactdiscintheearly1980s,technolog
SomerecenthistorianshavearguedthatlifeintheBritishcoloniesinAmericafromapproximately1763to1789wasmarkedbyin
ItisnothingnewthatEnglishuseisontherisearoundtheworld,especiallyinbusinesscircles.ThisalsohappensinFrance,
TheCinemaThefirstmovingpictures,developedinthe1890’s,weredifferentfromwhatweknowaboutcinematoday.Because
Australiahasalwaysbeenacontinentwithfewpeoplemainlybecause______.
SevenTypesofEvidenceItisimportanttolearntouseevidenceinargumentativewriting,becausewithoutevidence,youcan
Notsurprisingly,interactionamongpeoplesofdifferentculturesisoftenfilledwithuncertaintiesandevendifficulties.Take
随机试题
A、鳞状脱屑、脱发B、吸入性肺炎C、导管性脓毒症D、糖尿病非酮症性高渗性昏迷E、胆汁淤积鼻胃管肠内营养时常见发生的并发症是()
进行性贫血、出血和感染是再生障碍性贫血的主要临床表现。
患者,女,29岁。因感冒引起高热,体温39.4℃,脉搏112次/min,呼吸22次/min,遵医嘱给予10%氯化钾15ml加入5%葡萄糖500ml溶液中静脉滴注。患者诉,输液手臂疼痛。查看发现:局部无肿胀,挤压近端输液管有回血,输液畅通,每分钟58滴,正
某企业某月末有关账户的余额资料如下:其中:“应收账款”明细账账户金额:A公司借方余额81900元,B公司贷方余额25300元,C公司贷方余额3200元;“应付账款”明细账账户金额:D公司贷方余额102000元,E公司借方余额37200元;现金借方
该批货物的保税额度是()。在该批货物报关时,乐友公司应提供的单证包括()。
下列各项不属于《证券法》授予证券交易所的监管权力的是()。
按照规定,商业银行开展()个人理财业务,应向中国银监会申请批准。
HAMA所有项目均采用的是()级评分法。
“六书”之名最早见于《周礼·地官·保氏》,东汉许慎集前人研究之成果,费几十年的精力整理汉字,编成《说文解字》一书。其在《说文解字》的“叙”中写道:“周礼八岁入小学,保氏教国子先以六书。”以下选项中,“六书”中造字方法的名称表述正确的一项是()。
作为民法渊源的非制定法主要包括
最新回复
(
0
)