首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
At the fall 2001 Social Science History Association convention in Chicago, the Crime and Justice network sponsored a forum on th
At the fall 2001 Social Science History Association convention in Chicago, the Crime and Justice network sponsored a forum on th
admin
2013-01-12
73
问题
At the fall 2001 Social Science History Association convention in Chicago, the Crime and Justice network sponsored a forum on the history of gun ownership, gun use, and gun violence in the United States. Our purpose was to consider how social science history might contribute to the public debate over gun control and gun rights. To date, we have had little impact on that debate. It has been dominated by mainstream social scientists and historians, especially scholars such as Gary Kleck, John Lott, and Michael Bellesiles, whose work, despite profound flaws, is politically congenial to either opponents or proponents of gun control. Kleck and Mark Gertz, for instance, argue on the basis of their widely cited survey that gun owners prevent numerous crimes each year in the United States by using firearms to defend themselves and their property. If their survey respondents are to be believed, American gun owners shot 100,000 criminals in 1994 in self-defense—a preposterous number. Lott claims on the basis of his statistical analysis of recent crime rates that laws allowing private individuals to carry concealed firearms deter murders, rapes, and robberies, because criminals are afraid to attack potentially armed victims. However, he biases his results by confining his analysis to the year between 1977 and 1992, when violent crime rates had peaked and varied little from year to year. He reports only regression models that support his thesis and neglects to mention that each of those models find a positive relationship between violent crime and real income, and an inverse relationship between violent crime and unemployment.
Contrary to Kleck and Lott, Bellesiles insists that guns and America’s "gun culture" are responsible for America’s high rates of murder. In Belleville’s opinion, relatively few Americans owned guns before the 1850s or know how to use, maintain, or repair them. As a result, he says, guns contributed little to the homicide rate, especially among white, which was low everywhere, even in the South and on the frontier, where historians once assume guns and murder went hand in hand. According to Bellesiles, these patterns changed dramatically after the Mexican War and especially after the Civil War, when gun ownership became widespread and cultural changes encouraged the use of handguns to command respect and resolve personal and political disputes. The result was an unprecedented wave of gun-related homicides that never truly abated. To this day, the United States has the highest homicide rate of any industrial democracy. Belleville’s low estimates of gun ownership in early America conflict, however, with those of every historian who has previously studied the subject and have thus far proven irreproducible. Every homicide statistic he presents is either misleading or wrong.
Given the influence of Kleck, kott, Bellesiles and other partisan scholars on the debate over gun control and gun rights, we felt a need to pull together what social science historians have learned to date about the history of gun ownership and gun violence in America, and to consider what research methods and projects might increase our knowledge in the near future.
Which of following statements is TRUE about the public debate over gun network?
选项
A、It has little influence on the forum sponsored by the Crime and Justice network.
B、Neither supporters nor opponents of gun control cite the works of scholars.
C、The works of mainstream social scientists have great impact on it.
D、Many social science historians have so far failed to take part in it.
答案
C
解析
本题中,A、D两项与文章的意思不相符;B项在文中未被提及。从文中的"To date...been dominated by mainstream social scientists and historians.”可知,主流社会学家对枪支管制的影响很大。因此C项为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/uC9O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Theconceptofpersonalchoiceinrelationtohealthbehaviorsisanimportantone.Anestimated90percentofallillnessesmay
Someweeksago,ridinginacabfromBostontoCambridge,mydriverturnedandaskedmewhatIdidforaliving."TeachEnglish,
Insciencethemeaningoftheword"explain"sufferswithcivilization’severystepinsearchofreality.Sciencecannotreally
Insciencethemeaningoftheword"explain"sufferswithcivilization’severystepinsearchofreality.Sciencecannotreally
Theyneedtomovetonewandlargeapartments.Doyouknowofany______onesinthisarea?
Anyonewhodoubtsthatchildrenarebornwithahealthyamountofambitionneedspendonlyafewminuteswithababyeagerlylea
Americansnolongerexpectpublicfigures,whetherinspeechorinwriting,tocommandtheEnglishlanguagewithskillandgift.
Inthispart,youarerequiredtowriteacompositionentitledDualityofScience:ItsPositiveEffectsandSideEffectsinnol
随机试题
Asyouknow,whetherthepersonwillbeelectedpresidentisamatterof__________interest.
工期临床试验的目的是
针灸治疗肾阳虚遗尿在主穴方的基础上加
在质量管理过程中,排列图法可以发挥的作用有()。
甲上市公司具备健全且运行良好的组织机构,自股票上市以来连续盈利,每年向股东支付股利,且最近3年财务会计文件无虚假记载,也没有其他重大违法行为。2019年4月,甲公司拟增发新股,并决定选择乙证券公司作为甲公司增发新股的承销商承担承销业务。甲公司向乙证券公
我国客轮停靠在美国纽约港时,德国人甲在轮船上窃取我国公民乙价值4000元人民币的财物。对本案确立我国刑法效力的依据是()。
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性:
已知今年爷爷年龄的数字换位恰好是孙子的年龄,而3年后,爷爷的年龄恰好是孙子年龄的4倍,问爷爷今年多少岁?()
ForyearswehavebeentalkingaboutaddictiontotheInternet,andthentothemobilephone.ArecentsurveyinUKfoundthat_
ChildrenarebeingaskedtoorganizeweddingsfortheirparentsaspartofaBBCdrivetoreflectmodernBritain.Traditionally,
最新回复
(
0
)