首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
(1) Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the D
(1) Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the D
admin
2018-06-29
83
问题
(1) Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the Downing Street Strategy Unit who take an interest in "social capital". At intervals they go around asking people in assorted nations the question: " Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted?"
(2) The results are fascinating. The conclusion that leaps from the figures and into sensational headlines is that social dislocation, religious decline, public scandals, family fragmentation and the fear of crime have made us less trusting. Comparative surveys over 40 years suggest that British trustfulness has halved; in the 1950s 60 percent of us answered "yes, most people can be trusted" , in the 1980s 44 percent, today only 29 percent. Trust levels also continue to fall in Ireland and the U. S. —meanwhile, the Norwegians, Swedes, Danes and Dutch express tremendous confidence in one another’s probity: levels are actually rising. And the Palme d’Orr for paranoid mutual suspicion goes to the Brazilians—with less than 3 percent replying "yes"-—and the Turks with 6. 5 percent. The French, apparently, never trusted one another and still don’t. So we become less Scandinavian and more French (or Turkish) every year.
(3) Regarding Britain, the obvious conclusions are being drawn. Mr. Halpern and others cite reasons why we appear less trustful: the demise of the job-for-life culture, rising divorce, physical mobility, higher immigration, an aggressive commercial ethic and the new isolation of mass media. " You use your wealth to free yourself of the inconvenience of other people," says Halpern. "You ensure you have your own house, and you don’t even have to watch TV with your family because you have five TVs. "
(4) This is useful research, but there are a few caveats. The trouble is that you may not get a very thoughtful answer if you merely ask—as they did last year—whether " generally speaking, most people can be trusted". For the British like to think of themselves as canny, savvy, nobody’s fools. We have a powerful culture of satire and a hypercritical media which gleefully splash news of every private and public betrayal, however trivial. In our fantasy life we court paranoia, lapping up crime thrillers and spy novels. We are fascinated by rogues, from Chaucer’s Pardoner to Del Boy. We are bad at risk-assessment, and repeated surveys show that we fear crime far more than is justified.
(5) So we are conditioned to claim that we don’t trust people much. A Scandinavian or Dutchman is proud to express trust and affection for his fellow-man (I have just been sailing on a Dutch ship for a fortnight and the prevailing open-heartedness makes any Briton feel like Scrooge). Our national preference is to purse the lips, shake the head and affect an air of judicious canniness.
(6) But if you look at the actual daily workings of British society there is an astonishing degree of unquestioning trust of strangers, simply because we are a technological society. These respondents who tell the researchers that " generally speaking, people cannot be trusted" are in fact blithely trusting distant strangers all day long. Every time you get on a train or plane you put your life into the hands of unseen engineers and designers, drivers, pilots and traffic controllers. When you give a password to a bank call centre you are displaying trust; tapping your credit-card number on to an Internet site, you affirm the rectitude of a company you have never seen, and rely on the conscientiousness of distant software designers. The list of our trustful ways goes on and on. Twenty minutes’ contemplation of the simple scams uncovered by the BBC Watchdog should suggest that rather than living in a state of constant suspicion, in many areas of life we are relaxed to the point of gullibility.
(7) But ask the bald question, and we think immediately about those who publicly let us down: politicians who broke election promises, pension funds that jeopardized our future while their directors swanned off with bonuses, stars who turned sleazy. This is not entirely healthy. What we say will, in the end, become what we think. U. S. evidence is denser than ours, but broadly speaking it is clear that trust is linked to "social capital" — networks, alliances, local societies, anything that takes people out into common spaces. There is much discussion in the English-speaking nations about how to "rebuild" social capital, but I was glad to see that the 2002 report was extremely cautious about the ability of policy-makers to change things. The last thing we need is nagging. I also much enjoyed its worried little digression into the negative side of social capital—old-boy networks, micro-communities that exclude outsiders, ethnic ghettos, and so forth.
(8) Mr. Halpern’s book will come to more informed conclusions than I can; but my own instinct, from the research and from observation, is to draw only two. First, we’re not quite as cynical as we say we are, and nothing like as cynical as our media. Secondly, the worst crisis of trust is not actually between citizens, but between citizens and their government and institutions. The remedy for that is in the hands of politicians, who ought to police their own ambition and greed and that of their corporate friends. Interference from the top is a lousy idea. Example from the top would be much better.
In the last paragraph, the author seems to suggest all of the following EXCEPT that______.
选项
A、British government should set a good example for citizens
B、British government should bear responsibility for lowered trustfulness
C、British people should learn to trust their government more
D、British people aren’t distrustful of each other
答案
C
解析
推断题。末段指出,哈尔朋先生书中的结论会比我的更有见地;但通过上述调研和自己的观察,我本能地得出两个结论:第一,我们并没有像自己所称的那么愤世嫉俗,更不像媒体那样冷嘲热讽;第二,最大的信任危机并不在民众之间,而存在于民众与政府以及各种公共机构之间。补救办法则掌握在各位政客手中,他们应该控制一下自己以及企业界朋友的野心与贪欲。自上而下的干预令人生厌,不过自上而下的表率会更有效。由此可知,[A]、[B]和[D]都是作者的观点,故排除。这里并没有号召人们学习信任政府,故[C]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/sEEK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WritinganArgumentativeEssayI.Structureofanargumentativeessay—introduction:1)atopic2)some【T1】______information【T1】__
PassageThreeWhatisthepassagemainlyabout?
PassageThreeInthewriter’sopinion,whatproblemaffectsmicrowaveovens?
PassageFourWhat’stheauthor’sattitudetowardstheApple-Googlebattle?
Afterthirtyyearsofmarriedhappiness,hecouldstillremindhimselfthatVictoriawasendowedwitheverycharmexceptthethr
Whenschoolstartseachyear,themostimportantquestiononthemindsofparentsandchildrenis,Whowillbemyteacher?Thec
Americansarestillchucklingaboutthe"pantssuit".Aman—ajudge,noless—suedhisdrycleanersfor$54mforallegedlylosing
Forcenturies,immigrantshavecometoAmericaseekingthepromiseoflife,liberty,andthepursuitofhappiness.Somecamefl
Amajoraspectofmanyfirms’marketingstrategiesoverthepastdecadehavebeenthedevelopmentofnewproducts.【M1】______Co
(1)Muckyroads,unpredictableweather,andwetgroundthatsagsbeneathyourfeet.ItmustbespringtimeinNewEngland.(2)
随机试题
A.雌激素B.孕激素C.两者均是D.两者均非卵巢分泌的激素是
下列关于金融衍生工具的叙述,错误的是()。
3个月女孩,两下肢等长,双侧皮纹不对称,Ortolani试验阳性,如确诊为发育性髋关节脱位,首选的治疗方法为:()
钻芯测试路面厚度方法中,对基层材料有可能损坏试件时,也可用直径为()的钻头,钻孔深度必须达到层厚。
【2016改编】某企业拟于某城市新建一个工业项目,该项目可行性研究相关基础数据如下:1.拟建项目占地面积30亩,建筑面积11000m2,其项目设计标准、规模与该企业2年前在另一城市修建的同类项目相同,已建同类项目的单位建筑工程费用为1600元/m2,建筑
聚丙烯塑料管中,通过共聚合的方法使聚丙烯改性,以提高其抗冲击等性能,改性后的聚丙烯管的种类有()。
国内生产总值是按市场价格计算的一个国家(或地区)所有常住单位在一定时期内()的最终成果的总和。
美国三所大学的研究团最近就碳酸饮料对儿童行为问题产生的影响进行了评估。他们以美国20个大城市约3000名5岁儿童为研究对象,并对其中100名儿童进行分组实验,一组儿童喝碳酸饮料,而另一组无需喝碳酸饮料。实验结果显示,总体上喝碳酸饮料的儿童容易出现攻击性、
A、ItwasborninNewYork.B、Itisakindofmusicasastyleofplaying.C、Hearingjazz,peoplewanttodancetothemusic.D、I
Ourape-menforefathershadnoobviousnaturalweaponsinthestruggleforsurvivalintheopen.Theyhadneitherthepowerfult
最新回复
(
0
)