首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2017-06-11
47
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence " suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields—those having very longwave-lengths—and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as " a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is for from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that(electromagnetic fields)present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. " Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The view-point of the EPA is______
选项
A、there is casual link between electricity and cancer.
B、electricity really affects cancer.
C、controversial.
D、low frequency electromagnetic field is a possible cause of cancer.
答案
A
解析
由文章第二段第三句,环保署目前的结论是据科学证据指出极低频电磁场——具有长波的电磁场——和白血病,淋巴瘤及脑癌之间有着难以确定的联系,因此电和致癌有一定难以确定的关系。故选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/ryFO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Largecompaniesneedawaytoreachthesavingsofthepublicatlarge.Thesameproblem,onasmallerscale,facespracticallyev
Atallageandatallstagesoflife,fearpresentsaproblemtoalmosteveryone."Wearelargelytheplaythingsofourfears,"
Theteacher____expectshisstudentstopasstheuniversityentranceexamination.
TheParthenonTheParthenon,abuildinginAthens,Greece,isperhapsoneofthemostmemorablestructuresonEarth.Built25c
Olgahadalwaysenjoyedthecharacter-centeredbookswrittenbyAdeleKwanandwantedtoreadanotheroneifitseemedinteresti
Therearethreegeneralmethodspeopleusetoexplainandunderstandtheirworld:beliefs,pseudo-science,andscience.Whata
Thegreatchariotofsociety,whichforsolonghadrundownthegentleslopeoftradition,nowfounditselfpoweredbyaninterna
Ingeneral,theamountthatastudentspendsforhousingshouldbeheldtoone-fifthofthetotalforlivingexpenses.
Pupilsoftenwanttositnexttotheirparticularfriendandmanyclassroomactivitiesinvolvemovingabout,butevenrelatively
Ourfootballteam’s______hasbeenexcellentduringthewholeyear.
随机试题
“能行血中气滞,气中血滞,故专治一身上下诸痛”的药物是
中国社会主义现代化国家的基本特征包括()
精子获能的主要部位是:卵子在何位置等待受精:
A.上肢部分瘫痪,下肢深感觉的压力和位置觉存在,受伤平面以下无运动功能B.脊髓受损平面以下运动功能存在,但感觉分布区消失C.上肢功能丧失重于下肢功能丧失,脊髓远端运动功能优于脊髓近端运动功能D.伤侧的运动和本体感觉丧失,而对侧的痛觉和温觉丧失E.下
血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂最适用的临床情况是
外资股发行人向专业投资者配售股票的招股说明书的形式是( )。
以下关于产品成本分析方法的说法中,正确的有()。
外地务工的刘某夫妇在当地产下一男孩,今年已满七岁,但迟迟不能上学,当地教育局给出的理由是没有当地户籍。下列说法正确的是()。
美国著名摄影记者罗伯特?卡帕说:“像蚂蚁一样工作,像蝴蝶一样飞舞。”尼采说:“每一个不曾起舞的日子,都是对生命的辜负。”请结合实际。谈谈你的看法。
中国素食文化最兴盛之时,皆在盛世,而这并非巧合。所谓“八荒争凑,万国咸通。集四海之珍奇,皆归市易,会寰区之异味,悉在庖厨”。盛世不仅为“食不厌精、脍不厌细”提供了物质基础,还令更多的人可以从劳碌奔波中解脱出来,追求一种更为精致、优美的生活方式——素食,是其
最新回复
(
0
)