首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
[A] On the other hand are two compelling arguments against placing a duty on humans to protect endangered species. The first is
[A] On the other hand are two compelling arguments against placing a duty on humans to protect endangered species. The first is
admin
2020-03-31
28
问题
[A] On the other hand are two compelling arguments against placing a duty on humans to protect endangered species. The first is essentially the Darwinian argument that extinction results from the inexorable process of so-called "natural selection" in which stronger species survive while weaker ones do not. Moreover, we humans are not exempt from the process. Accordingly, if we see fit to eradicate other species in order to facilitate our survival, then to be it. We are only behaving as animals must, Darwin would no doubt assert.
[B] As I see it, there are three fundamental arguments for imposing on ourselves at least some responsibility to preserve endangered species, The first has to do culpability. According to this argument, to the extent that endangerment is the result of anthropogenic evenis such as clear-cutting of forests or polluting of lakes and streams, we humans have a duty to take affirmative measures to protect the species whose survival we’ve placed in jeopardy.
[C] The second argument, and the one that I find most compelling, is an appeal to logic over emotion. It is a scientific fact that thousands of animal species become extinct every year. Many such extinctions are due to natural forces, while others are due to anthropogenic factors. In any event it is far beyond our ability to save them all. By what standard, then, should we decide which species are worth saving and which ones are out? In my observation, we tend to favor animals with human-like physical characteristics and behaviors. This preference is understandablei after all, dolphins are far more endearing than bugs. But there is no logical justification for such a standard. Accordingly, what makes more sense is to decide based on our own economic self-interest. In other words, the more money and jobs it would cost to save a certain species, the lower priority we should place on doing so.
[D] What are the limits of our duty to save endangered species from extinction? The statement raises a variety of issues about morality, conscience, self-preservation and economics. On balance, however, I fundamentally agree with the notion that humans need not make "extraordinary" efforts—at the expense of money and job— to ensure the preservation of any endangered species.
[E] We should appeal to self-preservation. The animal kingdom is an intricate matrix of interdependent relationships, in which each species depends on many others for its survival. Severing certain relationships, such as that between a predator and its natural prey, can set into motion a series of extinctions that ultimately might endanger our own survival as a species. While this claim might sound far-fetched to some, environmental experts assure us that in the long run it is a very real possibility.
[F] The issue of endangered-species protection is a complex one, requiring subjective judgments about moral duty and the comparative value of various life-forms. Thus, there are no easy or certain answers. Yet it is for this very reason I agree that economic self-interest should take precedence over vague notions about moral duty when it comes to saving endangered species. In the final analysis, at a point when it becomes critical for our own survival as a species to save certain others, then we humans will do so if we are fit—in accordance with Darwin’s observed process of natural selection.
[G] The second argument has to do with capability. This argument disregards the extent to which we humans might have contributed to the endangerment of a species. Instead, the argument goes, if we are aware of the danger, know what steps are needed to prevent extinction, and can take those steps, then we are morally obligated to help prevent extinction. This argument would place a very high affirmative duty on humans to protect endangered species.
Order:
选项
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/rn1Z777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Individualsandbusinesseshavelegalprotectionforintellectualpropertytheycreateandown.Intellectualproper【C1】______fro
Individualsandbusinesseshavelegalprotectionforintellectualpropertytheycreateandown.Intellectualproper【C1】______fro
With950millionpeople,IndiarankssecondtoChinaamongthemostpopulouscountries.ButsinceChina【C1】______afamilyplan
SupposeyouarestudyinginWashingtonUniversity.Youlostyourpassportbyaccidentyesterday.WritealettertotheChineseE
McDonald’s,Greggs,KFCandSubwayaretodaynamedasthemostlitteredbrandsinEnglandasKeepBritainTidycalledonfast-fo
McDonald’s,Greggs,KFCandSubwayaretodaynamedasthemostlitteredbrandsinEnglandasKeepBritainTidycalledonfast-fo
Allaroundtheworld,lawyersgeneratemorehostilitythanthemembersofanyotherprofession—withthepossibleexceptionofjo
技术与天才哪个对科学发展更重要——1994年英译汉及详解Accordingtothenewschoolofscientists,technologyisanoverlookedforceinexpandingthehori
【F1】Materialculturereferstothetouchable,material"things—physicalobjectsthatcanbeseen,held,felt,used—thatacultu
OnSeptember19th,nearlyfivemonthsafterthespillstarted,BPfinallysealedtheMacondowell.Anadjoiningreliefwellhad
随机试题
机动车向左转弯、向左变更车道、准备超车、驶离停车地点或掉头时,应当提前
预防肺结核的最主要措施是
细菌培养送检的最佳时间应在()。
被动管理基金最常采用的策略是建立()。
某企业开发出一种新产品,单位成本为1,000元。根据以上资料,回答下列问题:假如该产品在行业中类似产品的价格为1,300元,若该商品价格定价为1,399元,则采用的定价策略是()。
在古代,道和德是两个概念。道德二字合用,始于战国时期的()。
从所给四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性:
WheredoesTomlive?
•Readthetextbelowaboutanaccountant.•Choosethebestwordtofilleachgap,fromA,B,CorD.•Foreachquestion193
Thispassagegivesageneraldescriptionoftheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofahybridauto-mobile.Oneoftheadvantagesof
最新回复
(
0
)