首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Three years ago, researchers announced the discovery of human genes that were capable of turning ordinary cells into malignant o
Three years ago, researchers announced the discovery of human genes that were capable of turning ordinary cells into malignant o
admin
2012-02-27
46
问题
Three years ago, researchers announced the discovery of human genes that were capable of turning ordinary cells into malignant ones. The news met with some skepticism. Experts asked how a single gene could cause such a dramatic change. Why does cancer take years or even decades to develop if it is caused by such a simple and direct process? In last week’s issue of the, three research teams answered those questions by setting forth a new model for understanding the role of oncogenes in cancer.
Each group found that it does in fact take more than a single gene to produce cancer in normal cells. Teams at M. I. T and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island, N. Y. , reported that they could induce cancer in normal rat cells only by inserting at least two types of oncogene into the cells. "A single oncogene produced some changes, but not cancer," explained molecular biologist Robert Weinberg of MIT. It took two genes acting cooperatively to produce a tumor. In other cases, it might take three or more.
A British team confirmed the multistep cancer scenario by showing that a particular oncogene caused a tumor in hamster cells only if they had first been exposed to a carcinogenic chemical. The chemical alone and the oncogene alone did not cause cancer, both were necessary. While the discovery has no immediate implication for treatment of cancer, it helps explain why the disease develops slowly and why its incidence rises with age. "Even if one part of the process occurs," says Weinberg, "you might not have the second step for another 20 years. "
Cells injected with a single cancer gene ______.
选项
A、were unaffected completely under such circumstances
B、only occasionally developed cancer
C、developed tumor but not cancer
D、were changed but did not become malignant
答案
D
解析
本题是细节题。文中第二段讲,Each group found that it does in fact take more than a single gene to produce cancer in normal cells. 每一个实验小组都发现,产生癌细胞至少需要两种以上的基因。且本段中给出了一个试验小组的例证来阐明这个观点。可见单一的致癌基因会发生某些变化,但不会成为癌症,故A、B选项错误,C选项内容从文中无从得知。所以D选项是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/raHO777K
0
在职攻硕英语联考
相关试题推荐
Ourcountryhadmadegreateffortstopromotethefamily-planningpolicy,but______thebirthrateisgettinghigherandhigher.(
TrafficisaperennialprobleminHongkong.Overtheyearsmanysuggestionshavebeen【C1】______toeasetransportdifficulties.T
Withthepossibleexceptionofequalrights,perhapsthemost【C1】______issueacrosstheUnitedStatestodayisthedeathpenalty
Withthepossibleexceptionofequalrights,perhapsthemost【C1】______issueacrosstheUnitedStatestodayisthedeathpenalty
Withthepossibleexceptionofequalrights,perhapsthemost【C1】______issueacrosstheUnitedStatestodayisthedeathpenalty
Initsbroadestsense,attributiontheoryisconcernedwithhowordinarypeoplemakesenseoftheworldandit______morecontrol
OneofFreud’sgreat______intothehumanpersonalitywasthediscoveryofhowitisinfluencedbyunconsciousprocesses.
TheEnglishlanguagecontainsa(n)______ofwordswhicharecomparativeseldomusedinordinaryconversation.
TheordinaryfamilycolonialNorthAmericawasprimarilyconcernedwithsheerphysicalsurvivalandbeyondthat,itsowneconomi
TheordinaryfamilycolonialNorthAmericawasprimarilyconcernedwithsheerphysicalsurvivalandbeyondthat,itsowneconomi
随机试题
假设检验是为了
初产妇,26岁,妊娠39周,估计胎儿体重3600g,坐骨结节间径7cm,出口后矢状径为6.5cm,正确的处理措施应为
根据《关于禁止商业贿赂行为的暂行规定》,下列说法正确的有()。
周某意图杀死简某,当其得知简某每天将煮饭用的水桶放在公共的水池边打水时,于一天晚上在简某的水桶上涂抹上无色的毒药,但是,晚上却是简某的邻居强某将水桶误提回家,结果强某因误食放有毒药的水而身亡。下列哪些判断不符合周某对强某死亡所持的心理态度?()
由国务院制定和发布的,包括决议、命令、管理条例、规定等,在全国范围内具有行政约束力的是()
不兑现的纸币本位制制度的特点包括()。
以下属于人本治疗模式的特点是。()。
设A=,正交矩阵Q使得QTAQ为对角矩阵.若Q的第一列为(1,2,1)T,求a,Q.
以下关于图片框控件的说法中,错误的是______。
A、Gostraightforward.B、Goodidea!C、Goodluck.D、You’rewelcome.BHowabout...用来征求意见或提建议。
最新回复
(
0
)