2. 考研
  3. April was an unusual, if not the cruelest, month for New York Times executive editor Jill Abramson, who in September will mark t

April was an unusual, if not the cruelest, month for New York Times executive editor Jill Abramson, who in September will mark t

admin2015-03-25  65
问题     April was an unusual, if not the cruelest, month for New York Times executive editor Jill Abramson, who in September will mark two years on the job. On Monday afternoon, April 15, Abramson—who, at 59, is the first woman to serve as top editor in the Times’ 160-year history— had barely begun savoring the four Pulitzer Prizes that her staff had just won when the Boston Marathon bombings occurred. Pulling an all-nighter at one point in the third-floor newsroom of the Times’ Renzo Piano-designed Manhattan skyscraper, she presided over a breathless week of "flooding the zone", while her reporters and editors managed to avoid the sort of embarrassing errors committed by the Associated Press, CNN, and even the Times Co. -owned Boston Globe.
    Then, the night of April 23, Politico—the Washington trade paper that aims to "drive the conversation"—published a story suggesting that Abramson’s young editorship was already a failure. Quoting anonymous former and current Times employees, Politico claimed she was widely considered "stubborn," "condescending," "difficult to work with," "unreasonable," "impossible," "disengaged," and "uncaring"—"on the verge of losing the support of the newsroom."
    A petite woman who speaks in an exaggerated Upper West Side drawl that evokes The Nanny Meets Harvard, Abramson was home alone in Tribeca the night the story broke. Her husband of 32 years, Henry Griggs, was out, as were their two adult children, when she read it online.
    Running The New York Times has never been for the faint of heart. Abramson’s 23 months at the wheel have been punctuated by the death in Syria of Pulitzer Prize-winning foreign correspondent Anthony Shadid, a bitter contract dispute with the Newspaper Guild, and, seven months ago, forced buyouts of around 30 midlevel editors, including some of the Times’ most beloved veterans.
    Yet, unique in an industry plagued by cutbacks and shutdowns, Abramson’s newsroom is staffed at the same level as it was a decade ago, and boasts 14 national and six regional bureaus, plus 25 foreign bureaus—more than at any moment in the paper’s history. This is in complete contrast to such newspapers as The Washington Post, which over the past decade closed all its domestic bureaus and reduced drastically the head count in its newsroom, once more than 900, by nearly a fourth. Meanwhile, the Times’ risky transition from free to metered online access appears to be working: the Web edition boasts more than 700,000 paying subscribers.
    Abramson, for her part, might have to leave her current job in six years, but she doesn’t see herself ever stopping work. "In terms of my professional life, I always felt a little happy that my husband and I never had much money. I never had to go through the should-l-stay-at-home conversation. I also wanted to work, because I really liked it. " She adds: "They’re gonna have to take me out feet first, or chop off my head. "
What makes April an unusual month for Jill Abramson?
选项 A、She was announced as a winner of Pulitzer Prize.
B、Two really big events occurred in the same month.
C、Her reporters and editors were not really cooperative.
D、Other press saw The New York Times as their major competitor.
答案B
解析 事实细节题。根据题干关键词Jill Abramson定位到第一段第二句。该句提到，四月份时，《纽约时报》的主编吉尔.艾布拉姆森还没从属下为她赢回来的四项普利策大奖中回过神来，就发生了波士顿马拉松赛场爆炸事件，便立刻投入到了紧张的报道工作之中。由此可知，两大事件使得四月成了一个不寻常的月份，因此选[B]。该段第二句说普利策奖是她的员工赢回来的，而不是吉尔本人赢得的，故排除[A]；文章中没有提到吉尔的记者和编辑之间不合作，故排除[C]；虽然该段最后一句提到了其他几家知名的出版巨头，但没有说这些出版社将《纽约时报》视为自己最大的竞争者，故排除[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/r174777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)