首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2019-08-27
86
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads — against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness (无情) toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the U.S.
B、History of the U.S. railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
文中第一段就提出1896年,在被裁决的所有过失案件中几乎有一半涉及铁路,但铁路经常会赢。后面以法威尔和仓库火灾这两个案例加以说明。据此可知,本文主要讨论的是与铁路公司有关的法律案件,D项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/qzTO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Ironically,theintellectualtoolscurrentlybeingusedbythepoliticalrighttosuchharmfuleffectoriginatedontheacademic
Ironically,theintellectualtoolscurrentlybeingusedbythepoliticalrighttosuchharmfuleffectoriginatedontheacademic
WorldTradeOrganizationDirector-generalRenatoRuggieropredictedthattheWTOwouldboostglobalincomesby$1trillionint
Whatoursocietysuffersfrommosttodayistheabsenceofconsensusaboutwhatitandlifeinitoughttobe;suchconsensusca
Lymediseaseiscausedbybacteriathatare______bydeertick.
Everyonehasamomentinhistory,whichbelongsparticularlytohim.Itisthemomentwhenhisemotionsachievetheirmostpower
【M1】Prosperousalumnihelpedmake2006arecordedfund-raisingyearforcollegesanduniversities,whichhauledin$28billion—a
Thepolicemantriedto______theteenagedrivertoobeythetrafficlawsratherthanfinehimdirectly.
Everynightshelistenedtoherfathergoingaroundthehouse,lockingthedoorsandwindows.Shelistened;thebackdoorclosed
中国是一个有五千年历史的文明古国,有着与外来文化取长补短、兼容并蓄的传统。我们的祖先历来强调“以和为贵"。由此,中国人民选择和平发展的道路是基于中国的文化传统、是基于惨痛的历史与严酷的现实所做出的明智选择。
随机试题
若玫瑰花茶的汤色红亮,甜香浓郁,香气芬芳则是红茶中的_______。
提出积差相关系数的统计学家是()
在阶级社会里,“超阶级,超政治”的教育是不存在的。
填料塔是静置设备中的()。
甲施工企业与乙起重机厂签订了一份购置起重机的买卖合同,约定4月1日甲付给乙100万元预付款,5月12日由乙向甲交付两辆起重机,但到了4月1日,甲经调查发现乙确已全面停产,经营状况严重恶化。此时甲可以(),以维护自己的合法权益。
基金销售人员在陈述所推荐基金或同一基金管理人管理的其他基金的过往业绩时,应当客观、全面、准确,并遵守以下行为规范()。I.提供业绩信息的原始出处Ⅱ.不片面夸大过往业绩Ⅲ.不预测所推介基金的未来业绩Ⅳ.根据推介基金的过往业绩合理预测其
以下关于导游证的说法中,正确的是()。
抱怨:埋怨
Thereareapproximatelythreequartersofatonoftermites(白蚁)foreverypersononEarth.Itnowturnsoutthatthesecritters
A、Theycanbeinstructedbybetterteachersthere.B、Theycanaccumulatemoregroupexperiencethere.C、Theycanbeindividually
最新回复
(
0
)