首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2017-11-28
46
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate — or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields — those having very long wave lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as " a possible , but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic — or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the government, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilo volts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
The main idea of this passage is______.
选项
A、studies on the cause of cancer
B、controversial viewpoints on the cause of cancer
C、the relationship between electricity and cancer
D、different ideas about the effect of electricity on cancer
答案
D
解析
主旨大意题。第一段第一句就提出问题,电会引发癌症吗?接下来的第一、二段肯定了电与癌症之间的联系。而第三至最后一段则否定了二者之间的联系。由此可归纳,文章的主旨是电与癌症之间的关系存在不同的看法,故答案为[D]项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/paua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
西方列强
Urgentactionisneededincountriesimpactedbyfragility,conflictandviolence(FCV)toendextremepovertyglobally,accordi
RichardNixonresignedin1974becauseof________.
Shehadastrong______togiveatalkaboutherexperiences,becauseshedidn’tlikethelimelight.
Inourhighlytechnologicalsociety,thenumberofjobsforunskilledworkersis______
Thisyearsometwenty-threehundredteenagersfromallovertheworldwillspendabouttenmonthsinU.S.homes.Theywillatte
AimlessnesshashardlybeentypicalofthepostwarJapanwhoseproductivityandsocialharmonyaretheenvyoftheUnitedSta
Theinkhadfadedwithtime,andsopartsoftheletterwere______.
AlthougheconomictiesbetweenmostAsia-Pacificeconomieshavenotyetsufferedanyfundamentaldamage.
______wooden,buildingshelpstoprotectthemfromdamageduetoweather.
随机试题
简述专断式行政领导方式的内涵。
在Word2010中,在______选项卡的“符号”组中,可以插入公式和符号等。
药品包装必须按照规定印有或者贴有
袁某,女,32岁,症见小便点滴不通,或量少而短赤灼热,小腹胀满,口苦口粘,大便不畅,苔黄腻,舌质红,脉数。患者若兼心烦,口舌生疮糜烂者,可合
嗜铬细胞瘤的最好发部位在()
下列融资方式属于间接融资的是()。
课程的一般范畴主要包括()。
深刻把握“四个全面”战略布局的新内涵,是深入学习和贯彻党的十九届五中全会精神的关键所在。关于“四个全面”的表述,下列选项正确的是()。
【路卡(卢卡)会议】2017年历史学统考真题
下列叙述中正确的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)