首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
(1) Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the D
(1) Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the D
admin
2018-06-29
47
问题
(1) Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the Downing Street Strategy Unit who take an interest in "social capital". At intervals they go around asking people in assorted nations the question: " Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted?"
(2) The results are fascinating. The conclusion that leaps from the figures and into sensational headlines is that social dislocation, religious decline, public scandals, family fragmentation and the fear of crime have made us less trusting. Comparative surveys over 40 years suggest that British trustfulness has halved; in the 1950s 60 percent of us answered "yes, most people can be trusted" , in the 1980s 44 percent, today only 29 percent. Trust levels also continue to fall in Ireland and the U. S. —meanwhile, the Norwegians, Swedes, Danes and Dutch express tremendous confidence in one another’s probity: levels are actually rising. And the Palme d’Orr for paranoid mutual suspicion goes to the Brazilians—with less than 3 percent replying "yes"-—and the Turks with 6. 5 percent. The French, apparently, never trusted one another and still don’t. So we become less Scandinavian and more French (or Turkish) every year.
(3) Regarding Britain, the obvious conclusions are being drawn. Mr. Halpern and others cite reasons why we appear less trustful: the demise of the job-for-life culture, rising divorce, physical mobility, higher immigration, an aggressive commercial ethic and the new isolation of mass media. " You use your wealth to free yourself of the inconvenience of other people," says Halpern. "You ensure you have your own house, and you don’t even have to watch TV with your family because you have five TVs. "
(4) This is useful research, but there are a few caveats. The trouble is that you may not get a very thoughtful answer if you merely ask—as they did last year—whether " generally speaking, most people can be trusted". For the British like to think of themselves as canny, savvy, nobody’s fools. We have a powerful culture of satire and a hypercritical media which gleefully splash news of every private and public betrayal, however trivial. In our fantasy life we court paranoia, lapping up crime thrillers and spy novels. We are fascinated by rogues, from Chaucer’s Pardoner to Del Boy. We are bad at risk-assessment, and repeated surveys show that we fear crime far more than is justified.
(5) So we are conditioned to claim that we don’t trust people much. A Scandinavian or Dutchman is proud to express trust and affection for his fellow-man (I have just been sailing on a Dutch ship for a fortnight and the prevailing open-heartedness makes any Briton feel like Scrooge). Our national preference is to purse the lips, shake the head and affect an air of judicious canniness.
(6) But if you look at the actual daily workings of British society there is an astonishing degree of unquestioning trust of strangers, simply because we are a technological society. These respondents who tell the researchers that " generally speaking, people cannot be trusted" are in fact blithely trusting distant strangers all day long. Every time you get on a train or plane you put your life into the hands of unseen engineers and designers, drivers, pilots and traffic controllers. When you give a password to a bank call centre you are displaying trust; tapping your credit-card number on to an Internet site, you affirm the rectitude of a company you have never seen, and rely on the conscientiousness of distant software designers. The list of our trustful ways goes on and on. Twenty minutes’ contemplation of the simple scams uncovered by the BBC Watchdog should suggest that rather than living in a state of constant suspicion, in many areas of life we are relaxed to the point of gullibility.
(7) But ask the bald question, and we think immediately about those who publicly let us down: politicians who broke election promises, pension funds that jeopardized our future while their directors swanned off with bonuses, stars who turned sleazy. This is not entirely healthy. What we say will, in the end, become what we think. U. S. evidence is denser than ours, but broadly speaking it is clear that trust is linked to "social capital" — networks, alliances, local societies, anything that takes people out into common spaces. There is much discussion in the English-speaking nations about how to "rebuild" social capital, but I was glad to see that the 2002 report was extremely cautious about the ability of policy-makers to change things. The last thing we need is nagging. I also much enjoyed its worried little digression into the negative side of social capital—old-boy networks, micro-communities that exclude outsiders, ethnic ghettos, and so forth.
(8) Mr. Halpern’s book will come to more informed conclusions than I can; but my own instinct, from the research and from observation, is to draw only two. First, we’re not quite as cynical as we say we are, and nothing like as cynical as our media. Secondly, the worst crisis of trust is not actually between citizens, but between citizens and their government and institutions. The remedy for that is in the hands of politicians, who ought to police their own ambition and greed and that of their corporate friends. Interference from the top is a lousy idea. Example from the top would be much better.
Which of the following statements about Scandinavians or Britons is INCORRECT?
选项
A、Scandinavians are generally frank and open.
B、Britons are reluctant to show hospitality.
C、Britons pretend to be shrewd.
D、Britons prefer satirical art.
答案
B
解析
细节题。第五段第二句指出,斯堪的纳维亚人或荷兰人乐于对他人表示信任友爱,并引以为傲,故[A]正确;第四段第四句指出,我们有强大的讽刺文化,吹毛求疵的媒体,不放过涉及私人、公众的任何一次欺骗背叛,故[D]正确;第五段末句指出,而我们英国人更喜欢撅撅嘴、摇摇头,假装精明机智,故[C]正确;文章没有提及[B],故为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/oEEK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
PassageFourWhyisanimaginaryargumentbetterthananactualconversation?
PassageFourWhatcantheexperienceoftravelingabroadhelpus?
AnothermilestoneonthejourneytowardsdigitalcashwaspassedonNovember13th.Thatdatemarkedtheemergencefrombeta-test
AsIwrite,agentle,muchneededrainisfallingthismorning.IthasbeenadryspringhereinVermont.Sodryinfact,thatt
Cambridgehastakenthetopspotinthisyear’sGuardianUniversityGuideleaguetable,breakingitsarchrivalOxford’ssix-yea
Forcenturies,immigrantshavecometoAmericaseekingthepromiseoflife,liberty,andthepursuitofhappiness.Somecamefl
Besidesconcernsabouthowadsaffectindividuals,criticshaveraisedethicalissuesabouthowadvertisingaffectssociety.F
Amajoraspectofmanyfirms’marketingstrategiesoverthepastdecadehavebeenthedevelopmentofnewproducts.【M1】______Co
It’stheholidayseasonandthatmeanskidsbythemillionsareaskingSantafortheopportunitytoblowawayenemysoldiersan
It’stheholidayseasonandthatmeanskidsbythemillionsareaskingSantafortheopportunitytoblowawayenemysoldiersan
随机试题
试说明“将在外君命有所不受”所蕴含的管理思想。
项王嗔目叱之,赤泉侯人马俱惊,辟易数里。
精子形成直接由
男,52岁。因咳嗽、痰中带血1个月入院。患者1个月前因受凉后出现咳嗽、咳痰症状,痰为白色泡沫痰,量较少。剧烈咳嗽后出现痰中带血,在当地医院给予抗感染及对症治疗,痰中带血症状消失,但咳嗽症状改善不明显。体检:T36.6℃,P79次/分,BP140/85
患者,女性,30岁,右手被砸伤l小时,右手肿胀,皮肤完整,可见青紫斑,压痛明显。X线检查未见骨折,其受伤类型为
组织机构设计原则有( )。
压杆的柔度反映了针对临界应力的影响因素是()。
下列各项中,影响上市流通的公司债券票面利率水平的是()。
在以知识为基础的经济兴起背后的基本论点是:在过去五年间,曾经存在着集中的市场激励的奇特结合,导致了计算技术、生物技术、电子通讯和运输领域巨大的技术进步,并已开始_________经济组织和政府按未来将要据以行使其职能的方式发生巨大变化的新希望。的确,有大量
要查找姓不是“诸葛”的学生,正确的表达式是
最新回复
(
0
)