首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish popu
admin
2010-05-14
92
问题
According to reports in major news outlets, a study published last week included a startling discovery: the nation’s Jewish population is in shrinking. The study, the National Jewish Population Survey, found 5.2 million Jews living in the United States in 2000, a drop of 5 percent, or 300,000 people, since a similar study in 1990. What’s truly startling is that the reported decline is not tree. Worse still, the sponsor of the $6 million study, United Jewish Communities, knows it.
Both it and the authors have openly admitted their doubts. They have acknowledged in interviews that the population totals for 2000 and 1990 were reached by different methods and are not directly comparable. The survey itself also cautions readers, in a dauntingly technical appendix, that judgment calls by the researchers may have led to an undercount. When the research director and project director were asked whether the data should be construed to indicate a declining Jewish population, they flatly answered no. In addition, other survey researchers interviewed pointed to other studies with population estimates as high as 6.7 million.
Despite all this, the two figures --5.2 million now, 5.5 million then --are listed by side in the survey, leaving the impression that the population has shrunk. The result, predictably, has been a rash of headlines trumpeting the illusionary decline, in turn touching off jeremiads by rabbis and moralists condemning the religious laxity behind it. Whether out of ideology, ego, incompetence or a combination of all three, the respected charity has invented a crisis.
United Jewish Communities is the coordinating body for a national network of Jewish philanthropies with combined budgets of $2 billion. Its population surveys carry huge weight in shaping community policy. This is not the first time the survey has set off a false alarm. The last one, conducted by a predecessor organization, found that 52 percent of American Jews who married between 1985 and 1990 did so outside the faith. That number was a fabrication produced by including marriages in which neither party was Jewish by anyone’s definition, including the researchers.
Its publication created a huge stir, inspiring anguished sermons, books and conferences. It put liberals on the defensive, emboldened conservatives who reject full integration into society and alienated ordinary folks by the increasingly xenophobic tone of Jewish communal culture. The new survey, to its credit, retracts that figure and offers the latest survey has spawned a panic created by the last one.
So why did the organization flawed figures once again? Some scholars who have studied the. survey believe the motivation then came partly out of a desire to shock straying Jews into greater observance. It’ s too early to tell if that’ s the case this time around. What is clear is the researchers did their job with little regard to how their data could be misconstrued. They used statistical models and question formats that, while internally sound, made the new survey incompatible with the previous one. For example, this time the researchers divided the population of 5.2 million into two groups--"highly involved" Jews and "people of Jewish background"- and posed most questions only to the first group. As a result, most findings about belief and observance refer only to a subgroup of American Jews, making comparisons to the past impossible.
We can’ t afford to wait a decade before these figures are revised. The false population decline must be corrected before it further sours communal discourse. The United Jewish Communities owes it to itself and its public to step forward and state plainly what it knows to be true: American Jews are not disappearing.
When the author is talking about the Jewish Population Survey, he seems ______.
选项
A、to believe the shrinking of the Jews in America
B、to support the rejection of full integration into society
C、to blame United Jewish Communities
D、to be willing to tolerate the fault of United Jewish Communities
答案
C
解析
文章的主要内容是揭示调查所得出的犹太人口下降谬论并指出其负面影响。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/nOqO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
HungerandfoodinsecurityhavebeencalledAmerica’s"hiddencrisis."Atthesametime,andapparentlyparadoxically,obesity
Iwanttodiscusssomeideasabouthowwemanageunderground【B1】______.Ifweonlytakeasmuchoutascomesin,we’renotgoing
RecreationalcyclingappearstohavepeakedintheUS,itspopularitycrestingsometimeduringLanceArmstrong’srecordrunsat
OnDecember5,1945,at2:00pm,agroupof【C1】______tookoffinperfectweatherforapracticeflightovertheAtlanticOcean.
Backin【B1】______,civilwarbrokeoutinBurundi.Manywerekilledina【B2】______ofinter-ethnicviolence.Thismonth,Bur
OnceshamewasaveryBritishemotion.Itgovernedpeople’sliveslongafterstocksandduckingstoolswereabolished.Shakespea
Bycomparison,farmers______receivemoregovernmentsubsidiesthanothers.Themessagethewriterattemptstoconveythrougho
Itcanbeinferredthatthedeafboy’slifeintheorphanagewasTheauthorwas______whenhetriedtoprotectthedeafkidag
Themeaningofwordsmaychangewithtime,"deer"isaexampleof______.
随机试题
什么叫正火?
Politicallythesenationstendtobe______,withveryhighbirthratesbutpooreducationandverylowlevelsofliteracy.
以食管黏膜糜烂并呈线状排列为病理特征的牛传染病是()
钱某与胡某婚后生有子女甲和乙,后钱某与胡某离婚,甲、乙归胡某抚养。胡某与吴某结婚,当时甲已参加工作而乙尚未成年,乙跟随胡某与吴某居住,后胡某与吴某生下一女丙,吴某与前妻生有一子丁。钱某和吴某先后去世,下列哪些说法是正确的?(卷三2009年真题试卷第68题题
停车数量大于300辆或总建筑面积大于10000m2的汽车库为()类汽车库。
乡试因在春季举行,又称“春闱”。()
胰岛素调节维生素、无机盐的代谢。()
《人民警察法》规定,录用人民警察,必须按照国家规定,公开考试,严格考核,择优录用。()
行きます撮ります見せます届けます買いますします李さんは私の家へ遊びに()。
Lastnighthesawtwodark________enterthebuilding,andthentherewastheexplosion.
最新回复
(
0
)