首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
admin
2022-06-18
71
问题
Municipal
bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective. But are all smoking bans equally successful?
The barkeeper and blogger who writes as "Scribbler50" was outraged when, in 2003, New York City enacted one of the first comprehensive smoking bans in bars and restaurants, "How can a guy and some board just kick us in the teeth like this? This smacks of fascism." If people are aware of the consequences of smoking or visiting places with lots of secondhand smoke, should the government really have to tell us what to do? Won’t people just vote with their feet and smoke even more when they’re at home and away from restrictions?
Scribbler50’s post inspired the physician who blogs as "PalMD" last week to look up the research on the effectiveness of smoking bans. He found several studies showing that not only did workers in restaurants and bars show improved health shortly after the bans were put in place, but smokers themselves also reduced the number of cigarettes they smoked.
Overall, however, smoking rates remain persistently high, despite the common workplace smoking bans. Can other government measures help these smokers live healthier lives, or at least prevent people from taking up the habit?
In the U.S., warning messages have been in place on cigarette packages for decades. But the messages are rather clinical, for example: "Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, and May Complicate Pregnancy." What if packages contained more dramatic warnings? In January, psychologist and science writer Christian Jarrett looked at a small study of smokers’ reactions to cigarette warnings. The researchers measured self-esteem in student smokers, then showed them cigarette packages with either death-related warnings ("Smokers die earlier") or esteem-related warnings ("Smoking makes you unattractive"). Students who derived self-esteem from smoking and saw the death-related warnings later viewed smoking more positively than those who saw the esteem-related warnings. For students whose smoking wasn’t motivated by self-esteem, the effect was reversed.
So not all anti-smoking messages are equal: Depending on who the message is directed at, a morbid warning on a cigarette label may actually
backfire
.
Scribbler50 for his part, is now a convert favoring smoking restrictions, at least in his narrow limits as a bartender. His patrons who haven’t quit smoking say they smoke a lot less now that they have to go outside to get a nicotine fix. He doesn’t miss emptying ashtrays, or the holier-than-thou customers who complained every time a fellow patron lit up, or working in a smoke-filled bar all night and going home "smelling like you put out a three-alarm".
Would it be right to enact even more restrictions on smoking in the interest of public health? It’s hard to deny that banning smoking in public, indoor spaces has been a huge success. Why not try out some stronger smoking bans? Parents in some areas are already restricted from smoking in cars with children, but I haven’t seen a study that evaluates the success of those measures. Perhaps a state or municipality could try extending the ban to homes, with provisions for studying the results. It’s also possible that stronger measures would be counter-productive, like the stronger warnings on cigarette labels. Maybe we’ll decide that at some level deciding whether or not to smoke should still be an individual choice. Or maybe in a few generations, it won’t be necessary to regulate smoking: There won’t be any smokers left.
The word "municipal" underlined in Paragraph 1 means _____.
选项
A、governmental
B、organizational
C、cosmopolitan
D、institutional
答案
C
解析
municipal意为“城市的”,故C“大都会的,都市的”与之最为接近。A“政府的”,ban本身就指官方、政府的禁令,不必再指出是“政府的”。B“组织的”和D“机构的”均不符合。
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/nHuO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
TheEarlyHistoryofMotionPicturesP1:Thetechnologythatmadepossibletheprojectionandexhibitionofphotographedmoving
1ThenumberofinsectspeciesonEarthexceedsthatofallotherlifeformscombined.Entomologistsestimatethattherearewel
The"babyboomers"aretheAlargestgenerationinrecenthistory;Bconsequently,theyhadCmoreimpactonthebirthratethandi
TheHurons,AwhomnumberedabouttwentyBthousandinthe1600s,CwereaconfederationofNativeAmericangroupsDthatspokeWyan
TouristsAtraveledabroadshouldcarryadebitcardBaswellasacreditcardbecauseautomatictellermachinesCareavailablei
Howdoestheprofessordevelopthetopicoftheviolinfamily?Choosetwoanswers.
MEXICANMURALART(1)ThefirstmajormodernartmovementinLatinAmericawasMexicanmuralism,whichfeaturedlarge-scale
OxfordWhenlanguagelearnersarriveinOxford,manyaskwheretheuniversityis,thinkingthattheywillbeshownjust
Thesecausesproducedthegreatchangeinthecountrythatmodernizedthe______ofhighereducationfromthemid-1860stothemid
Thiscolorlessgasiscalledoxygen,whofiresburnmuchbetter.
随机试题
简述预防脑疝发生的护理措施。
对比增强磁共振血管造影所采用的序列
患者,男。自青少年时起,经常有鼻腔堵塞、流涕、不适等症状,在五官科检查时,医生考虑患者可能患鼻炎或鼻窦炎,在讨论中,提出了以下问题。鼻窦中开口高于窦底的是
A.蠕虫B.原虫滋养体C.线虫卵D.原虫包囊E.血吸虫卵尼龙袋集卵法适于什么的检查
本病例最可能的诊断是除药物治疗外要注意的是
水泥混凝土施工前检验项目应包括的内容有()。
背景资料清河泵站设计装机流量150m3/s,出口防洪闸所处堤防为1级。招标人对出口防洪闸工程施工招标进行公开招标。有关招标工作计划如下:5月31日提交招标备案报告,6月1日发布招标公告,6月11日一15日出售招标文件,5月16日组织现场踏勘,6月
假如各个标志值都增加5个单位,那么算术平均数会()。
A、Becauseheisdoingaverypromisingjob.B、Becausehisbossdoesn’tallowhimtoquithisjob.C、Becausehecan’tsupporthim
ExchangeRates:ABriefHistoryofExchangeRatesForcenturies,thecurrenciesoftheworldwerebackedbygold.Thatis,apie
最新回复
(
0
)