首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-04-26
37
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
The passage mainly discusses ______. ( )
选项
A、who are to evaluate teachers’ lecturing
B、how to promote teachers
C、how to give lectures in classes
D、how to help improve teachers’ lecturing techniques
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://www.kaotiyun.com/show/n5qC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Perhapsthedaysmaynotbelongincoming______allthevaluablesubstancesincoalandoilwillbefullyutilized.
Atornadois______.ThepersonwhofoundAmy’sbabywas______.
Parentsshouldn’t______(favorable)oneoftheirchildrenmorethantheothers.
TheBritishgovernmentoftensaysthatfurnishingchildrenwith______totheinformationsuperhighwayisatoppriority.
ThefirstAmerican______(perform)ofthisoperawasin1926.
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisTRUE,accordingtotheauthor?Consideredjudgmentisdifferentfrompersonalpreferencei
Hedoenotcareabouttheprice,(solongasthequalityishigh).
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteacompositiononthetopic:TheFirstLettertoa’PenPal’.Youshouldwrite
Theauthorsayschildreninthecityseldomwenttothewoodsandthefieldsbecause______.Bysaying"Hisideawasasuccess"
—Howabouteighto’clockoutsidethecinema?—That______mefine.
随机试题
人工跌水应控制水面与池岸的关系、池岸与地面的关系,并限制池水的深度,可进入的池内深度一般限制为_______mm。
一个设计良好的表格应该是
按照《会计法》的要求,所有实行独立核算和非独立核算的单位部必须依法设置会计账簿。()
流水线的形状一般包括()。
在处理各种利益关系时,要做到()。
下列关于教材编写说法错误的是().
在教学过程中,学生掌握科学概念主要受()等因素的影响。
下列句子中,有语病的是:
人民警察的政治纪律是有关人民警察政治觉悟、政治行为和政治言论方面的规范。基于人民警察的性质,对人民警察政治方面的纪律主要是()。
一个栈的初始状态为空。现将元素1、2、3、4、5、A、B、C、D、E依次入栈,然后再依次出栈,则元素出栈的顺序是()。
最新回复
(
0
)